Jan Bosteels, Philippe Delattin, Jean Pierre Van Boxelaer, Marcel De Bruyn, Jan Moerman, Paul De Vos, Paul Vermylen
{"title":"Measurement of β-hCG in cul-de-sac fluid vs. serum in the rapid detection of ectopic pregnancy","authors":"Jan Bosteels, Philippe Delattin, Jean Pierre Van Boxelaer, Marcel De Bruyn, Jan Moerman, Paul De Vos, Paul Vermylen","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00153.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study was designed to assess the value of measuring the cul-de-sac fluid to serum β-hCG ratio as a rapid test for the detection of ectopic pregnancy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measure</h3>\n \n <p>The parameter chosen was the level of the β-hCG in cul-de-sac fluid vs. that in serum (D/S ratio).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective controlled hospital-based study included 53 patients. The control group was 25 patients, who were being treated with <i>in vitro</i> fertilization. Group A comprised 15 patients who had had an intra-uterine miscarriage, histologically proven after suction curettage. Group B included 13 patients treated by laparoscopy for a histologically proven ectopic pregnancy. In each group β-hCG was measured in both serum and cul-de-sac fluid and the appropriate D/S ratio was calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the control group the mean D/S ratio was 0.49 (SEM = 0.03). The mean D/S ratio in group A was 0.78 (SEM = 0.14). In group B the mean D/S ratio was 8.47 (SEM = 2.53). The differences in D/S ratio between the control group and group A were statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05).The differences in D/S ratio between the control group and group B were statistically highly significant (<i>P</i> < 0.00001). Of more interest is the fact that the difference in the D/S ratio between group A and group B was also statistically highly significant (<i>P</i> < 0.0005).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The D/S ratio for β-hCG can be used as a rapid and reliable biochemical test to distinguish between eutopic and ectopic implantation in the pathological pregnancy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"7 1","pages":"9-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00153.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00153.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study was designed to assess the value of measuring the cul-de-sac fluid to serum β-hCG ratio as a rapid test for the detection of ectopic pregnancy.
Main outcome measure
The parameter chosen was the level of the β-hCG in cul-de-sac fluid vs. that in serum (D/S ratio).
Design
This prospective controlled hospital-based study included 53 patients. The control group was 25 patients, who were being treated with in vitro fertilization. Group A comprised 15 patients who had had an intra-uterine miscarriage, histologically proven after suction curettage. Group B included 13 patients treated by laparoscopy for a histologically proven ectopic pregnancy. In each group β-hCG was measured in both serum and cul-de-sac fluid and the appropriate D/S ratio was calculated.
Results
In the control group the mean D/S ratio was 0.49 (SEM = 0.03). The mean D/S ratio in group A was 0.78 (SEM = 0.14). In group B the mean D/S ratio was 8.47 (SEM = 2.53). The differences in D/S ratio between the control group and group A were statistically significant (P < 0.05).The differences in D/S ratio between the control group and group B were statistically highly significant (P < 0.00001). Of more interest is the fact that the difference in the D/S ratio between group A and group B was also statistically highly significant (P < 0.0005).
Conclusion
The D/S ratio for β-hCG can be used as a rapid and reliable biochemical test to distinguish between eutopic and ectopic implantation in the pathological pregnancy.