‘As Efficient as a Factory’: Architectural and Managerial Discourses on Government Office Buildings in Belgium, 1919–39

IF 0.1 2区 历史学 0 ARCHITECTURE
J. V. Maele
{"title":"‘As Efficient as a Factory’: Architectural and Managerial Discourses on Government Office Buildings in Belgium, 1919–39","authors":"J. V. Maele","doi":"10.1017/arh.2022.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates the impact of managerial ideologies on projects for new governmental office buildings in Belgium in the 1920s and 1930s. Following the prewar publication of F. W. Taylor’s ‘scientific management’ theories, the scientisation of office activities was propagated by efficiency experts throughout the western world. In Belgium, as in France, the work of the mining engineer Henri Fayol was particularly influential. According to Fayol, private and public bureaucracies had to follow identical managerial principles, notably that all employees were to observe one another as much as possible. These ideas of visibility overlapped with the emphasis on transparency and open planning coming from quite a different quarter, namely Le Corbusier, Hannes Meyer and other modernist architects in the 1920s and 1930s. Yet how Fayol’s ideal was to be realised without compromising the traditional need for privacy for high-ranking office workers remained unresolved. The article explores the ideas of two crucial expert groups — architects and managerial experts — over these issues as they developed in Belgium in the inter-war years. In the 1920s, the mining engineer Max-Léo Gérard called for ministerial buildings that facilitated ‘collaborative work’ and the information scientist Paul Otlet advocated an ideal type of government offices based on an architectural diagram that facilitated mutual observation. In the 1930s, the architect Stanislas Jasinski proposed remodelling the centre of Brussels as a series of office blocks, in a design copied from Le Corbusier’s cruciform skyscrapers in the Plan Voisin. Such ideas received official endorsement with the Royal Commissariat for Administrative Reform under Louis Camu, which proposed to strengthen the societal role of governmental bureaucracy by rehousing the civil service in an enormous office complex close to the parliament. Contrasting with the idealism of these unrealised plans was one of the few government projects actually built, the Ministry of Science and Arts headquarters designed in 1929 by the in-house architect Georges Hano.","PeriodicalId":43293,"journal":{"name":"ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY","volume":"27 1","pages":"21 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/arh.2022.2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article investigates the impact of managerial ideologies on projects for new governmental office buildings in Belgium in the 1920s and 1930s. Following the prewar publication of F. W. Taylor’s ‘scientific management’ theories, the scientisation of office activities was propagated by efficiency experts throughout the western world. In Belgium, as in France, the work of the mining engineer Henri Fayol was particularly influential. According to Fayol, private and public bureaucracies had to follow identical managerial principles, notably that all employees were to observe one another as much as possible. These ideas of visibility overlapped with the emphasis on transparency and open planning coming from quite a different quarter, namely Le Corbusier, Hannes Meyer and other modernist architects in the 1920s and 1930s. Yet how Fayol’s ideal was to be realised without compromising the traditional need for privacy for high-ranking office workers remained unresolved. The article explores the ideas of two crucial expert groups — architects and managerial experts — over these issues as they developed in Belgium in the inter-war years. In the 1920s, the mining engineer Max-Léo Gérard called for ministerial buildings that facilitated ‘collaborative work’ and the information scientist Paul Otlet advocated an ideal type of government offices based on an architectural diagram that facilitated mutual observation. In the 1930s, the architect Stanislas Jasinski proposed remodelling the centre of Brussels as a series of office blocks, in a design copied from Le Corbusier’s cruciform skyscrapers in the Plan Voisin. Such ideas received official endorsement with the Royal Commissariat for Administrative Reform under Louis Camu, which proposed to strengthen the societal role of governmental bureaucracy by rehousing the civil service in an enormous office complex close to the parliament. Contrasting with the idealism of these unrealised plans was one of the few government projects actually built, the Ministry of Science and Arts headquarters designed in 1929 by the in-house architect Georges Hano.
“像工厂一样高效”:1919 - 1939年比利时政府办公大楼的建筑和管理论述
本文研究了20世纪20年代和30年代比利时新建政府办公楼项目中管理意识形态的影响。随着f·w·泰勒(F. W. Taylor)的“科学管理”理论在战前的出版,办公室活动的科学化在整个西方世界得到了效率专家的宣传。在比利时和法国一样,采矿工程师亨利·法约尔(Henri Fayol)的工作尤其有影响力。根据法约尔的说法,私营和公共官僚机构必须遵循相同的管理原则,特别是所有雇员都要尽可能地相互观察。这些可见性的理念与强调透明度和开放规划的理念重叠,这些理念来自于一个完全不同的领域,即勒·柯布西耶(Le Corbusier)、汉内斯·迈耶(Hannes Meyer)和其他20世纪二三十年代的现代主义建筑师。然而,法约尔的理想如何在不损害高级办公室职员对隐私的传统需求的情况下实现,仍未得到解决。本文探讨了建筑师和管理专家这两个重要专家组在两次世界大战期间在比利时对这些问题的看法。20世纪20年代,采矿工程师max - lsamo gsamrard呼吁建造有利于“协同工作”的部长大楼,信息科学家Paul Otlet则主张建立一种基于便于相互观察的建筑图表的理想政府办公室。20世纪30年代,建筑师斯坦尼斯拉斯·亚辛斯基(Stanislas Jasinski)提出将布鲁塞尔市中心改造为一系列办公大楼,其设计抄袭了勒·柯布西耶(Le Corbusier)在Plan Voisin中的十字形摩天大楼。这些想法得到了路易斯·卡穆领导下的皇家行政改革委员会的正式认可,该委员会提议通过将公务员安置在靠近议会的一个巨大的办公大楼中,来加强政府官僚机构的社会作用。与这些未实现计划的理想主义形成鲜明对比的是为数不多的实际建成的政府项目之一,1929年由内部建筑师Georges Hano设计的科学和艺术部总部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信