Buprenorphine pharmacotherapy for the management of neonatal abstinence syndrome in methadone‐exposed neonates

Afshin A Taleghani, B. Isemann, Ward Rice, Laura P Ward, K. Wedig, H. Akinbi
{"title":"Buprenorphine pharmacotherapy for the management of neonatal abstinence syndrome in methadone‐exposed neonates","authors":"Afshin A Taleghani, B. Isemann, Ward Rice, Laura P Ward, K. Wedig, H. Akinbi","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aimed to compare the outcomes of pharmacotherapy with either buprenorphine or methadone in infants treated for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) secondary to intrauterine exposure to methadone. This is a multi‐center, retrospective cohort study to assess length of treatment (LOT), hospital length of stay (LOS), and cumulative opioid exposure between infants treated with either methadone or buprenorphine for NAS secondary to in utero exposure to methadone. Infants delivered at a gestational age ≥35 weeks and a maternal history of opioid‐use disorder and/or urine drug screen positive for methadone, and postnatal pharmacotherapy for NAS with either buprenorphine or methadone as first‐line opioid replacement therapy, were eligible. Median LOT, LOS, and cumulative opioid exposure were compared between buprenorphine‐ and methadone‐treated infants. A total of 156 infants (48 treated with buprenorphine and 108 with methadone) were identified. The median LOT and LOS for buprenorphine‐treated infants was 8 and 13 days compared with 15 and 20 days for methadone‐treated infants, respectively, P < .001 for both outcomes. Median cumulative opioid dose in morphine equivalents was 0.6 mg/kg for buprenorphine‐treated infants vs 1.05 mg/kg for methadone‐treated infants, P < .001. No adverse effects were noted among either group. Of infants treated with buprenorphine, 34 (71%) required the addition of adjunctive pharmacotherapy during the NICU stay, compared with 31 (32%) in the methadone‐treated group, P = .0008. However, significantly fewer infants treated with buprenorphine required continuation of therapy beyond discharge as compared with those treated with methadone. The difference is most likely a reflection of the protocols used by the sites. In infants that required pharmacotherapy for NAS secondary to intrauterine exposure to methadone, treatment with buprenorphine, compared with methadone therapy, was associated with better outcomes. If confirmed with prospective data, buprenorphine could be considered first‐line therapy for the two medication‐assisted treatment regimens recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.","PeriodicalId":19634,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain","volume":"83 1","pages":"33 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We aimed to compare the outcomes of pharmacotherapy with either buprenorphine or methadone in infants treated for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) secondary to intrauterine exposure to methadone. This is a multi‐center, retrospective cohort study to assess length of treatment (LOT), hospital length of stay (LOS), and cumulative opioid exposure between infants treated with either methadone or buprenorphine for NAS secondary to in utero exposure to methadone. Infants delivered at a gestational age ≥35 weeks and a maternal history of opioid‐use disorder and/or urine drug screen positive for methadone, and postnatal pharmacotherapy for NAS with either buprenorphine or methadone as first‐line opioid replacement therapy, were eligible. Median LOT, LOS, and cumulative opioid exposure were compared between buprenorphine‐ and methadone‐treated infants. A total of 156 infants (48 treated with buprenorphine and 108 with methadone) were identified. The median LOT and LOS for buprenorphine‐treated infants was 8 and 13 days compared with 15 and 20 days for methadone‐treated infants, respectively, P < .001 for both outcomes. Median cumulative opioid dose in morphine equivalents was 0.6 mg/kg for buprenorphine‐treated infants vs 1.05 mg/kg for methadone‐treated infants, P < .001. No adverse effects were noted among either group. Of infants treated with buprenorphine, 34 (71%) required the addition of adjunctive pharmacotherapy during the NICU stay, compared with 31 (32%) in the methadone‐treated group, P = .0008. However, significantly fewer infants treated with buprenorphine required continuation of therapy beyond discharge as compared with those treated with methadone. The difference is most likely a reflection of the protocols used by the sites. In infants that required pharmacotherapy for NAS secondary to intrauterine exposure to methadone, treatment with buprenorphine, compared with methadone therapy, was associated with better outcomes. If confirmed with prospective data, buprenorphine could be considered first‐line therapy for the two medication‐assisted treatment regimens recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
丁丙诺啡药物治疗美沙酮暴露新生儿戒断综合征的疗效观察
我们的目的是比较丁丙诺啡和美沙酮药物治疗治疗因宫内美沙酮暴露而继发的新生儿戒断综合征(NAS)的结果。这是一项多中心、回顾性队列研究,旨在评估接受美沙酮或丁丙诺啡治疗的婴儿在子宫内美沙酮暴露后继发NAS的治疗时间(LOT)、住院时间(LOS)和累积阿片类药物暴露情况。孕龄≥35周出生的婴儿,母亲有阿片类药物使用障碍史和/或尿液美沙酮药物筛查阳性,产后以丁丙诺啡或美沙酮作为一线阿片类药物替代治疗的NAS药物治疗均符合条件。比较丁丙诺啡和美沙酮治疗婴儿的LOT、LOS和累积阿片类药物暴露的中位数。共有156名婴儿被确定(48名接受丁丙诺啡治疗,108名接受美沙酮治疗)。丁丙诺啡治疗的婴儿LOT和LOS的中位数分别为8天和13天,而美沙酮治疗的婴儿LOT和LOS的中位数分别为15天和20天,两种结果的P < 0.001。丁丙诺啡治疗的婴儿中位阿片类药物累积剂量为0.6 mg/kg,美沙酮治疗的婴儿中位阿片类药物累积剂量为1.05 mg/kg, P < 0.001。两组均未发现不良反应。在接受丁丙诺啡治疗的婴儿中,有34例(71%)在新生儿重症监护病房期间需要额外的辅助药物治疗,而美沙酮治疗组为31例(32%),P = 0.0008。然而,与接受美沙酮治疗的婴儿相比,接受丁丙诺啡治疗的婴儿在出院后需要继续治疗的人数明显减少。这种差异很可能反映了网站使用的协议。对于因宫内美沙酮暴露而继发NAS需要药物治疗的婴儿,与美沙酮治疗相比,丁丙诺啡治疗与更好的结果相关。如果前瞻性数据得到证实,丁丙诺啡可作为美国妇产科医师学会推荐的两种药物辅助治疗方案的一线治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信