Warrantless GPS Surveillance: Search and Seizure - Using the Right to Exclude to Address the Constitutionality of GPS Tracking Systems Under the Fourth Amendment

Jace C. Gatewood
{"title":"Warrantless GPS Surveillance: Search and Seizure - Using the Right to Exclude to Address the Constitutionality of GPS Tracking Systems Under the Fourth Amendment","authors":"Jace C. Gatewood","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1973627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"GPS tracking systems are a rapidly growing technology that provide a wide range of benefits, including navigation, transportation, and public safety. Of the many potential uses of GPS technology, location tracking is perhaps one of the fastest-growing GPS applications today. Law enforcement agencies nationwide secretly use GPS tracking systems to conduct surveillance on suspected criminals in a variety of situations, which has led to countless arrests and convictions. The unfettered use of GPS tracking raises many unanswered questions about an individual’s right to privacy in an increasingly technological world. This Article explores traditional concepts of property rights; specifically, the right to exclude, that underlie fundamental notions of the right to privacy and the protection of property interests under the Fourth Amendment. This Article advocates that the right to exclude is so inextricably connected to the right to privacy and the protection of property interests that any invasion of the right to exclude, absent a warrant, consent or other exigent circumstances, (i) violates one’s reasonable expectation of privacy sufficient to constitute a “search” under the Fourth Amendment, and (ii) represents a meaningful interference with property interests sufficient to constitute a “seizure” under the Fourth Amendment.","PeriodicalId":87424,"journal":{"name":"The University of Memphis law review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The University of Memphis law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1973627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

GPS tracking systems are a rapidly growing technology that provide a wide range of benefits, including navigation, transportation, and public safety. Of the many potential uses of GPS technology, location tracking is perhaps one of the fastest-growing GPS applications today. Law enforcement agencies nationwide secretly use GPS tracking systems to conduct surveillance on suspected criminals in a variety of situations, which has led to countless arrests and convictions. The unfettered use of GPS tracking raises many unanswered questions about an individual’s right to privacy in an increasingly technological world. This Article explores traditional concepts of property rights; specifically, the right to exclude, that underlie fundamental notions of the right to privacy and the protection of property interests under the Fourth Amendment. This Article advocates that the right to exclude is so inextricably connected to the right to privacy and the protection of property interests that any invasion of the right to exclude, absent a warrant, consent or other exigent circumstances, (i) violates one’s reasonable expectation of privacy sufficient to constitute a “search” under the Fourth Amendment, and (ii) represents a meaningful interference with property interests sufficient to constitute a “seizure” under the Fourth Amendment.
未经授权的GPS监视:搜查和扣押-在第四修正案下使用排他权来解决GPS跟踪系统的合宪性
GPS跟踪系统是一项快速发展的技术,它提供了广泛的好处,包括导航、运输和公共安全。在GPS技术的许多潜在用途中,位置跟踪可能是当今增长最快的GPS应用之一。全国各地的执法机构秘密使用GPS跟踪系统对各种情况下的犯罪嫌疑人进行监视,导致无数人被逮捕和定罪。不受约束地使用GPS跟踪,在一个日益科技化的世界里,引发了许多关于个人隐私权的未解之谜。本文探讨了传统的产权概念;特别是排他权,这是第四修正案规定的隐私权和保护财产利益的基本概念的基础。该条主张,排他权与隐私权和财产权益保护密不可分,任何对排他权的侵犯,在没有逮捕证、同意或其他紧急情况下,(i)违反了个人对隐私的合理期望,足以构成第四修正案规定的“搜查”;(ii)对财产利益的有意义的干涉,足以构成第四修正案规定的“扣押”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信