Verifica di un pregiudizio scettico

IF 0.1 3区历史学 0 CLASSICS

PHILOLOGUS Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.1515/phil-2023-0113

Gianluca Conte

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The author returns to a much debated topic, the so-called “Episode of Helen”, which has come to us only through indirect transmission, and endeavors to dismantle the prejudice against Virgilian authorship. G. P. Goold’s pugnacious intervention, dating back to more than half a century ago, contributed decisively – in fact, more than it should have – to the thesis that the text is spurious. A critical analysis of the text will demonstrate this claim to be groundless while offering arguments that support the authenticity of the episode.

查看原文本刊更多论文

怀疑偏见的检验

作者回归到一个备受争议的话题，即所谓的“海伦的插曲”，这一话题是通过间接传播才来到我们面前的，并试图消除对弗吉尼亚作者的偏见。早在半个多世纪前，g·p·戈尔德(G. P. gold)的好斗干预就对《圣经》是假的这一论点起到了决定性的作用——事实上，比它应该起到的作用更大。对文本的批判性分析将证明这种说法是毫无根据的，同时提供支持情节真实性的论据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

PHILOLOGUS CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Die Beiträge behandeln Probleme der griechischen und lateinischen Literatur, Geschichtsschreibung, Philosophie, Religionsgeschichte und Linguistik sowie ihrer Rezeption und der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Ziel der Zeitschrift ist es, einen Beitrag zur Erhellung der geistigen Kultur der Antike und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte zu leisten. "Philologus" is one of the oldest and most respected periodicals in the field of classical studies. Its articles investigate Greek and Roman literature, historiography, philosophy, history of religion, linguistics, and history of science. The journal contributes to reconstructing and understanding ancient intellectual culture and its lasting influence on European civilization.