Setting a local research agenda for women's health: The National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health.

L. Mosca, C. Allen, E. Fernández-Repollet, C. Kim, M. Lee, J. McAuley, M. McLaughlin
{"title":"Setting a local research agenda for women's health: The National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health.","authors":"L. Mosca, C. Allen, E. Fernández-Repollet, C. Kim, M. Lee, J. McAuley, M. McLaughlin","doi":"10.1089/152460901317193512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although women's health research expanded greatly in the past 10 years, significant gaps in knowledge remain. Prioritization and promotion of research will help assure continuing progress in closing such gaps and improving the health of women. Although a comprehensive agenda for the new millennium has been developed at the national level, the process for establishing a local research agenda is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to describe criteria for and barriers to establishing a local research agenda in women's health. A secondary aim was to describe mechanisms for identifying women's health researchers and for facilitating multidisciplinary research. Directors of Research at National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health (CoEs) (n = 18) were surveyed by mail for this information. The results indicate that the local research agenda should emphasize health issues that are prevalent in women, research that is likely to establish treatment, psychosocial/cultural factors, and quality of life issues. The process of setting a research agenda should include input from the communities served as well as from scientists. Critical evaluation of scientific strengths and weaknesses is an essential preliminary step in prioritizing research opportunities in order to implement and evaluate a research agenda in women's health.","PeriodicalId":80044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"927-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/152460901317193512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Although women's health research expanded greatly in the past 10 years, significant gaps in knowledge remain. Prioritization and promotion of research will help assure continuing progress in closing such gaps and improving the health of women. Although a comprehensive agenda for the new millennium has been developed at the national level, the process for establishing a local research agenda is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to describe criteria for and barriers to establishing a local research agenda in women's health. A secondary aim was to describe mechanisms for identifying women's health researchers and for facilitating multidisciplinary research. Directors of Research at National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health (CoEs) (n = 18) were surveyed by mail for this information. The results indicate that the local research agenda should emphasize health issues that are prevalent in women, research that is likely to establish treatment, psychosocial/cultural factors, and quality of life issues. The process of setting a research agenda should include input from the communities served as well as from scientists. Critical evaluation of scientific strengths and weaknesses is an essential preliminary step in prioritizing research opportunities in order to implement and evaluate a research agenda in women's health.
为妇女健康制定地方研究议程:国家妇女健康卓越中心。
尽管过去10年妇女健康研究大大扩大,但在知识方面仍然存在重大差距。优先考虑和促进研究将有助于确保在缩小这种差距和改善妇女健康方面继续取得进展。虽然在国家一级已经制定了一个全面的新千年议程,但是制定地方研究议程的进程还没有得到很好的界定。本研究的目的是描述建立当地妇女健康研究议程的标准和障碍。第二个目的是描述确定妇女保健研究人员和促进多学科研究的机制。通过邮件对国家妇女健康卓越中心的研究主任(n = 18)进行了这方面的调查。结果表明,地方研究议程应强调妇女普遍存在的健康问题、可能确定治疗方法的研究、社会心理/文化因素以及生活质量问题。制定研究议程的过程应该包括来自所服务的社区和科学家的投入。对科学的优势和弱点进行批判性评价是确定研究机会的优先次序,以便执行和评价妇女健康方面的研究议程的必要初步步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信