EFFECTS OF RESPONSE-REINFORCER RELATIONS ON THE MAINTENANCE OF COORDINATED RESPONDING UNDER SCHEDULES OF SIMULTANEOUS REINFORCEMENT

Q4 Psychology
Lucas Couto de Carvalho, Letícia dos Santos, Alceu Regaço, D. D. de Souza
{"title":"EFFECTS OF RESPONSE-REINFORCER RELATIONS ON THE MAINTENANCE OF COORDINATED RESPONDING UNDER SCHEDULES OF SIMULTANEOUS REINFORCEMENT","authors":"Lucas Couto de Carvalho, Letícia dos Santos, Alceu Regaço, D. D. de Souza","doi":"10.5514/rmac.v45.i2.75573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of response-reinforcer relations on coordinated responding were investigated. Coordinated responding was defined as two lever presses, one by each rat that occurred within 500 ms of one another. Four conditions were arranged in an ABCB design. Coordinated responding was reinforced according to a fixed-ratio 6 (FR 6) schedule in Condition A. In Condition B, a response by each rat was required, independent of their temporal proximity, to produce water delivery under a variable-interval schedule. Condition C was a replication of Condition B, except that coordinated responding was required for reinforcer deliveries. All conditions involved simultaneous reinforcement, that is the rats received access to reinforcers at the same time. The results extended previous findings by demonstrating the requirement of coordinated responses to produce reinforcement affected both coordinated response rates and the proportion of such responses relative to the total responses in a session, in that both measures were higher in Conditions A and C than in Condition B. There also was control of the temporal distribution of coordinated responding by the type of schedule (FR or VI): A “break-and-run” pattern was observed under the FR schedule, and a constant response rate was observed under the VI schedule.","PeriodicalId":53598,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v45.i2.75573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The effects of response-reinforcer relations on coordinated responding were investigated. Coordinated responding was defined as two lever presses, one by each rat that occurred within 500 ms of one another. Four conditions were arranged in an ABCB design. Coordinated responding was reinforced according to a fixed-ratio 6 (FR 6) schedule in Condition A. In Condition B, a response by each rat was required, independent of their temporal proximity, to produce water delivery under a variable-interval schedule. Condition C was a replication of Condition B, except that coordinated responding was required for reinforcer deliveries. All conditions involved simultaneous reinforcement, that is the rats received access to reinforcers at the same time. The results extended previous findings by demonstrating the requirement of coordinated responses to produce reinforcement affected both coordinated response rates and the proportion of such responses relative to the total responses in a session, in that both measures were higher in Conditions A and C than in Condition B. There also was control of the temporal distribution of coordinated responding by the type of schedule (FR or VI): A “break-and-run” pattern was observed under the FR schedule, and a constant response rate was observed under the VI schedule.
反应-强化关系对同步强化计划下协调反应维持的影响
研究了响应-强化关系对协调响应的影响。协调反应被定义为两次杠杆按压,每只大鼠一次按压在500毫秒内发生。在ABCB设计中安排了四种条件。在条件a中,协调响应根据固定比率6 (FR 6)时间表得到加强。在条件B中,每只大鼠都需要一个响应,独立于它们的时间距离,以在可变间隔时间表下产生水输送。条件C是条件B的复制,只是需要对强化物的交付进行协调反应。所有条件都涉及同时强化,即大鼠同时获得强化物。研究结果扩展了先前的研究结果,证明协调反应产生强化的要求既影响协调反应率,也影响这种反应相对于一次会话中总反应的比例,因为条件a和C的这两个测量值都高于条件b。此外,协调反应的时间分布也受到时间表类型(FR或VI)的控制。在FR计划下观察到“破跑”模式,在VI计划下观察到恒定的响应率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta
Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta Psychology-Applied Psychology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信