How do Norwegian second-grade teachers use guided reading? The quantity and quality of practices

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anne Håland, Å. K. H. Wagner, Erin M. McTigue
{"title":"How do Norwegian second-grade teachers use guided reading? The quantity and quality of practices","authors":"Anne Håland, Å. K. H. Wagner, Erin M. McTigue","doi":"10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper documents how teachers use guided reading practices in Norwegian second-grade classrooms. In a two- part study consisting of teachers’ self -reports (Study 1) and video-observations of guided reading sessions (Study 2), we analyzed the frequency and characteristics of guided reading practices. Findings from Study 1 indicate that guided reading is a common practice of Norwegian second-grade teachers and that discussing word meaning, text, and pictures are the most frequently addressed literacy components. Findings from Study 2 illustrate that the teachers regularly make optimal use of the before-reading phase, while the after-reading phase is relatively lacking. The observational data also indicate that teachers are more likely to simply check studen ts’ understanding of word meaning rather than to work in -depth with vocabulary. Likewise, teachers were more likely to supply help in the decoding process rather than scaffold students’ decoding with strategies. In sum, the data indicate that teachers may not fully use the ben- efits that guided reading instruction can afford. We discuss how to help educators use more of the potential of guided reading, arguing that the benefits of guided reading can be strengthened by (1) more in- depth planning, (2) greater use of strategies, and (3) routines for observing and assessing.","PeriodicalId":43406,"journal":{"name":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper documents how teachers use guided reading practices in Norwegian second-grade classrooms. In a two- part study consisting of teachers’ self -reports (Study 1) and video-observations of guided reading sessions (Study 2), we analyzed the frequency and characteristics of guided reading practices. Findings from Study 1 indicate that guided reading is a common practice of Norwegian second-grade teachers and that discussing word meaning, text, and pictures are the most frequently addressed literacy components. Findings from Study 2 illustrate that the teachers regularly make optimal use of the before-reading phase, while the after-reading phase is relatively lacking. The observational data also indicate that teachers are more likely to simply check studen ts’ understanding of word meaning rather than to work in -depth with vocabulary. Likewise, teachers were more likely to supply help in the decoding process rather than scaffold students’ decoding with strategies. In sum, the data indicate that teachers may not fully use the ben- efits that guided reading instruction can afford. We discuss how to help educators use more of the potential of guided reading, arguing that the benefits of guided reading can be strengthened by (1) more in- depth planning, (2) greater use of strategies, and (3) routines for observing and assessing.
挪威二年级教师如何使用引导阅读?实践的数量和质量
本文记录了教师如何在挪威二年级课堂上使用引导阅读练习。在一项由教师自我报告(研究1)和引导阅读课程视频观察(研究2)两部分组成的研究中,我们分析了引导阅读练习的频率和特征。研究1的发现表明,引导阅读是挪威二年级教师的一种常见做法,讨论词义、文本和图片是最常被提及的识字部分。研究2的研究结果表明,教师对阅读前阶段的利用较为充分,而对阅读后阶段的利用相对缺乏。观察数据还表明,教师更倾向于简单地检查学生对单词含义的理解,而不是深入学习词汇。同样,教师更倾向于在解码过程中提供帮助,而不是用策略来支持学生的解码。总之,这些数据表明教师可能没有充分利用导读教学所能提供的好处。我们讨论了如何帮助教育者更多地利用引导阅读的潜力,认为引导阅读的好处可以通过(1)更深入的计划,(2)更多地使用策略,以及(3)观察和评估的常规来加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信