Developing Assessment Instrument of Data, Technology, and Human Literacy in Physics Learning

Candra Dewi, A. Rusilowati, Fianti Fianti
{"title":"Developing Assessment Instrument of Data, Technology, and Human Literacy in Physics Learning","authors":"Candra Dewi, A. Rusilowati, Fianti Fianti","doi":"10.15294/jere.v8i2.38370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine validity of the assessment instrument data, technology, and human literacy in physics learning. The research method uses research and development (RnD) with modified 4-D model until development stage. Instrument of validation was assessed by 6 validators. The instrument was tested by 36 students of class X SMK Texmaco Semarang. The form of instruments is multiple choice test with 21 item to measure the cognitive domain. Data analysis in this research are tests of content validity, reliability, internal consistency, discrimination power, and level of difficulty. The results of the content validity by using Aiken’s coefficient get an average score 0.84 with a valid category at significance level of 0.05. Cronbach’s Alpha and ICC values from reliability test are 0.77 and 0.806 with reliable categories. The results of internal consistency showed that 80.95% items had a good internal consistency. There are 4 items with category not used from the discrimination power test. Furthermore from the results of the difficulty level, 7 items are easy, 13 items are medium, and 1 item is difficult. Based on results of the instrument analysis can be concluded that the instrument developed were valid and reliabel then can be used to measure ability of data, technology, and humans literacy in physics learning. \n ","PeriodicalId":30816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v8i2.38370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study aims to determine validity of the assessment instrument data, technology, and human literacy in physics learning. The research method uses research and development (RnD) with modified 4-D model until development stage. Instrument of validation was assessed by 6 validators. The instrument was tested by 36 students of class X SMK Texmaco Semarang. The form of instruments is multiple choice test with 21 item to measure the cognitive domain. Data analysis in this research are tests of content validity, reliability, internal consistency, discrimination power, and level of difficulty. The results of the content validity by using Aiken’s coefficient get an average score 0.84 with a valid category at significance level of 0.05. Cronbach’s Alpha and ICC values from reliability test are 0.77 and 0.806 with reliable categories. The results of internal consistency showed that 80.95% items had a good internal consistency. There are 4 items with category not used from the discrimination power test. Furthermore from the results of the difficulty level, 7 items are easy, 13 items are medium, and 1 item is difficult. Based on results of the instrument analysis can be concluded that the instrument developed were valid and reliabel then can be used to measure ability of data, technology, and humans literacy in physics learning.  
开发物理学习中的数据、技术和人文素养评估工具
本研究旨在确定评估工具数据、技术和人类素养在物理学习中的有效性。研究方法采用改进的四维模型直至开发阶段的研究与开发(RnD)。验证仪器由6名验证者进行评估。该仪器由SMK德士马古三宝朗X班36名学生进行测试。测试工具的形式为选择题测试,共有21个测试项目。本研究的数据分析包括内容效度、信度、内部一致性、辨别力、难易程度的检验。采用aiken系数对内容效度进行分析,平均得分为0.84,有效类别在显著性水平为0.05。信度检验的cronbach α值和ICC值分别为0.77和0.806。内部一致性结果显示,80.95%的项目具有良好的内部一致性。判别力测试中有4个项目未使用类别。此外,从难度等级的结果来看,7个项目为容易,13个项目为中等,1个项目为困难。仪器分析结果表明,所研制的仪器是有效可靠的,可用于测量物理学习中的数据能力、技术能力和人文素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书