Indymedia and Standing Rock: Media-historic moments

Q2 Social Sciences
D. Kidd
{"title":"Indymedia and Standing Rock: Media-historic moments","authors":"D. Kidd","doi":"10.1386/joacm_00091_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews the legacy of the global Indymedia Center (IMC), a news and information network of 175 autonomous media centres that operated in every world region autonomously of the dominant corporate and public service communications and information systems. Emerging first during protests against the neo-liberal practices of the World Trade Organization, the IMC represented a media-historic moment, one of the first times that social movement media activists were able to bypass the dominant media to produce their own reports and circulate them directly to activists and supporters around the world. My review examines the composition of the IMC’s infrastructure and volunteer force, and their technological and communications repertoires in relation to the dominant communications systems, and consider their legacy in succeeding cycles of social movement contention. I then compare the legacy of the IMC with the more recent media-historic moment of the Standing Rock Sioux water protectors who in 2016 tactically employed a land-based mobilization with a movement-directed online and offline communications assemblage to mobilize against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline on their traditional territory. Capturing more US and international dominant media attention than any previous Indigenous movement, and reaching even more people with their self-generated media, they countered the neo-liberal extractivist paradigm of resource exploitation and also affirmed their Indigenous sovereignty, history and knowledge systems. Finally, I summarize some of the similarities and differences between the two cases and suggest questions for further study.","PeriodicalId":36092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alternative and Community Media","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alternative and Community Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00091_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reviews the legacy of the global Indymedia Center (IMC), a news and information network of 175 autonomous media centres that operated in every world region autonomously of the dominant corporate and public service communications and information systems. Emerging first during protests against the neo-liberal practices of the World Trade Organization, the IMC represented a media-historic moment, one of the first times that social movement media activists were able to bypass the dominant media to produce their own reports and circulate them directly to activists and supporters around the world. My review examines the composition of the IMC’s infrastructure and volunteer force, and their technological and communications repertoires in relation to the dominant communications systems, and consider their legacy in succeeding cycles of social movement contention. I then compare the legacy of the IMC with the more recent media-historic moment of the Standing Rock Sioux water protectors who in 2016 tactically employed a land-based mobilization with a movement-directed online and offline communications assemblage to mobilize against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline on their traditional territory. Capturing more US and international dominant media attention than any previous Indigenous movement, and reaching even more people with their self-generated media, they countered the neo-liberal extractivist paradigm of resource exploitation and also affirmed their Indigenous sovereignty, history and knowledge systems. Finally, I summarize some of the similarities and differences between the two cases and suggest questions for further study.
独立媒体和立岩:媒体的历史性时刻
本文回顾了全球独立媒体中心(IMC)的遗产,这是一个由175个独立媒体中心组成的新闻和信息网络,独立于占主导地位的企业和公共服务通信和信息系统,在世界每个地区自主运作。IMC最早出现在反对世界贸易组织新自由主义做法的抗议活动中,代表了媒体的历史性时刻,这是社会运动媒体活动家第一次能够绕过主流媒体制作自己的报道,并直接传播给世界各地的活动家和支持者。我的评论考察了IMC的基础设施和志愿者力量的组成,以及他们与主流通信系统相关的技术和通信技能,并考虑了他们在随后的社会运动争论周期中的遗产。然后,我将IMC的遗产与最近的媒体历史时刻进行了比较,立岩苏族水保护者在2016年策略性地采用了基于陆地的动员,通过运动指导的在线和离线通信组合,动员反对在他们的传统领土上建设达科他输油管道。与以往的土著运动相比,他们获得了更多的美国和国际主流媒体的关注,并通过他们自己创造的媒体接触到更多的人,他们反对新自由主义的资源开采主义范式,同时也肯定了他们的土著主权、历史和知识体系。最后,总结了两个案例的异同,并提出了值得进一步研究的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alternative and Community Media
Journal of Alternative and Community Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信