Synthesizing Qualitative Research in Software Engineering: A Critical Review

Xin Huang, He Zhang, Xin Zhou, M. Babar, Song Yang
{"title":"Synthesizing Qualitative Research in Software Engineering: A Critical Review","authors":"Xin Huang, He Zhang, Xin Zhou, M. Babar, Song Yang","doi":"10.1145/3180155.3180235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synthesizing data extracted from primary studies is an integral component of the methodologies in support of Evidence Based Software Engineering (EBSE) such as System Literature Review (SLR). Since a large and increasing number of studies in Software Engineering (SE) incorporate qualitative data, it is important to systematically review and understand different aspects of the Qualitative Research Synthesis (QRS) being used in SE. We have reviewed the use of QRS methods in 328 SLRs published between 2005 and 2015. We also inquired the authors of 274 SLRs to confrm whether or not any QRS methods were used in their respective reviews. 116 of them provided the responses, which were included in our analysis. We found eight QRS methods applied in SE research, two of which, narrative synthesis and thematic synthesis, have been predominantly adopted by SE researchers for synthesizing qualitative data. Our study determines that a signifcant amount of missing knowledge and incomplete understanding of the defned QRS methods in the community. Our effort also identifes an initial set factors that may in?uence the selection and use of appropriate QRS methods in SE.","PeriodicalId":6560,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"1207-1218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3180155.3180235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Synthesizing data extracted from primary studies is an integral component of the methodologies in support of Evidence Based Software Engineering (EBSE) such as System Literature Review (SLR). Since a large and increasing number of studies in Software Engineering (SE) incorporate qualitative data, it is important to systematically review and understand different aspects of the Qualitative Research Synthesis (QRS) being used in SE. We have reviewed the use of QRS methods in 328 SLRs published between 2005 and 2015. We also inquired the authors of 274 SLRs to confrm whether or not any QRS methods were used in their respective reviews. 116 of them provided the responses, which were included in our analysis. We found eight QRS methods applied in SE research, two of which, narrative synthesis and thematic synthesis, have been predominantly adopted by SE researchers for synthesizing qualitative data. Our study determines that a signifcant amount of missing knowledge and incomplete understanding of the defned QRS methods in the community. Our effort also identifes an initial set factors that may in?uence the selection and use of appropriate QRS methods in SE.
软件工程中的综合定性研究:综述
从原始研究中提取的综合数据是支持基于证据的软件工程(EBSE)如系统文献综述(SLR)的方法论的一个组成部分。由于软件工程(SE)中大量且不断增加的研究包含定性数据,系统地回顾和理解在SE中使用的定性研究综合(QRS)的不同方面是很重要的。我们回顾了2005年至2015年间发表的328份单反报告中QRS方法的使用情况。我们还询问了274篇单反的作者,以确认他们各自的综述中是否使用了QRS方法。其中116人提供了回复,这些回复被纳入我们的分析。我们发现在SE研究中使用了8种QRS方法,其中叙事综合和主题综合两种方法被SE研究者主要用于合成定性数据。我们的研究表明,社会上对QRS方法的定义存在大量的知识缺失和不完整的理解。我们的努力还确定了一组初始因素,这些因素可能在?在SE中选择和使用合适的QRS方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信