{"title":"Habitus, campo y capital. Lecciones teóricas y metodológicas de un sociólogo bearnés","authors":"A. U. Cerón-Martínez","doi":"10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: En la formula Campo + [Capital + Habitus] = Practicas sociales, se condensan las aportaciones de un autor como Pierre Bourdieu a nivel teorico, y de ahi es posible desprender el metodo de abordaje para la investigacion social al recuperar lo objetivo y lo subjetivo de las practicas sociales. A partir de los conceptos asi formulados, se proponen dos lecciones que se desprenden del trabajo intelectual del sociologo bearnes: lecciones teoricas y algunas lecciones metodologicas derivadas de las primeras, con el fin de contribuir a una sistematizacion explicita de su modus operandi para la investigacion social, toda vez que el autor nunca lo hizo para evitar que sus aportaciones quedasen atrapadas con la rigidez de los esquemas escolasticos. En este sentido, el autor es tanto objeto como instrumento de la reflexion propuesta que mira a la nocion de capital como la metodologicamente mas importante para la practica de la investigacion social. EnglishAbstract: In the formula Field + [Capital + Habitus] = Social practices, the contributions of an author such as Pierre Bourdieu are condensed on a theoretical level, and from there it is possible to detach the approached method for social research by recovering the objective and subjective aspects of social practices based on the concepts thus formulated, two lessons are proposed that are derived from the intellectual work of the bearnese sociologist: theoretical lessons and some methodological lessons derived from the former, in order to contribute to an explicit systematization of their modus operandi for social research, since the author never did it to avoid that his contributions were trapped with the rigidity of the scholastic schemes. In this sense, the author is both an object and an instrument of the proposed reflection that looks at the notion of capital as the most important methodologically for the practice of social research.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
espanolResumen: En la formula Campo + [Capital + Habitus] = Practicas sociales, se condensan las aportaciones de un autor como Pierre Bourdieu a nivel teorico, y de ahi es posible desprender el metodo de abordaje para la investigacion social al recuperar lo objetivo y lo subjetivo de las practicas sociales. A partir de los conceptos asi formulados, se proponen dos lecciones que se desprenden del trabajo intelectual del sociologo bearnes: lecciones teoricas y algunas lecciones metodologicas derivadas de las primeras, con el fin de contribuir a una sistematizacion explicita de su modus operandi para la investigacion social, toda vez que el autor nunca lo hizo para evitar que sus aportaciones quedasen atrapadas con la rigidez de los esquemas escolasticos. En este sentido, el autor es tanto objeto como instrumento de la reflexion propuesta que mira a la nocion de capital como la metodologicamente mas importante para la practica de la investigacion social. EnglishAbstract: In the formula Field + [Capital + Habitus] = Social practices, the contributions of an author such as Pierre Bourdieu are condensed on a theoretical level, and from there it is possible to detach the approached method for social research by recovering the objective and subjective aspects of social practices based on the concepts thus formulated, two lessons are proposed that are derived from the intellectual work of the bearnese sociologist: theoretical lessons and some methodological lessons derived from the former, in order to contribute to an explicit systematization of their modus operandi for social research, since the author never did it to avoid that his contributions were trapped with the rigidity of the scholastic schemes. In this sense, the author is both an object and an instrument of the proposed reflection that looks at the notion of capital as the most important methodologically for the practice of social research.
espanolResumen提出:在资本领域+ [+ Habitus] =社会实践,封装了缴款作者皮埃尔鉴别那里teorico层面可能解开登机的方式来恢复社会调查的目标和你主观的社会实践。从概念所强调的那样,提出了两个热气的脑力劳动中吸取的教益sociologo bearnes教训:teoricas和产生的一些课metodologicas首批,以帮助sistematizacion根据社会调查的莫,鉴于提交人不会为了避免费用所作的贡献困僵硬地escolasticos模式。从这个意义上说,作者既是反思的对象,也是反思的工具,反思的目标是资本的危害,是社会研究实践中最重要的方法论。EnglishAbstract提出:In the Field + [+ Habitus] =社会资本,董事会of an提交人如皮埃尔鉴别are condensed on a理论层面,and it单人床from there to detach the method for Social research by废弃物the目标和询问主观aspects of Social practices based on the概念因此formulated, two lessons are - that are毁坏from the intellectual work of the bearnese sociologist:从前任那里得到的理论教训和一些方法论教训,以便对其社会研究工作方式的明确系统化作出贡献,因为作者从未避免他的贡献受到学术模式僵化的阻碍。从这个意义上说,作者既是对资本概念进行反思的对象,也是对社会研究实践进行反思的工具。
期刊介绍:
Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.