Quantification of uncertainty in zero-flow pressure approximation

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
M. Prignon, A. Dawans, G. van Moeseke
{"title":"Quantification of uncertainty in zero-flow pressure approximation","authors":"M. Prignon, A. Dawans, G. van Moeseke","doi":"10.1080/14733315.2020.1777020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Multiple authors stated that, when performing fan pressurization test, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) method should not be used as a regression technique anymore. However, alternative methods require first to quantify components of uncertainty in pressure and air flow rate measurements. This work aims at quantifying the uncertainty in zero-flow pressure approximation, which is mainly due to short-term fluctuation of wind speed and direction. This has been done by statistically analysing the uncertainty indicator of 40 zero-flow pressure tests performed on 30 different units on eight different sites in Brussels. First, the analysis showed that this uncertainty could be reduced by increasing the period of measurement used to compute zero-flow pressure approximation. Second, it shows that the standard deviation of zero-flow pressure measurements was the variable with the most significant impact on the quality of the zero-flow pressure approximation. Third, it provides three different linear models to predict uncertainty as a function of different variables. This study experienced some limitations due to the available sample of tested units. These limitations lead to important further work: the validation of the model on another sample of buildings and its adaptation if needed. Further work should also focus on integrating these results on the uncertainty in envelope pressure measurements and on the uncertainty in airtightness estimation of the building.","PeriodicalId":55613,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ventilation","volume":"29 1","pages":"248 - 257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ventilation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14733315.2020.1777020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Multiple authors stated that, when performing fan pressurization test, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) method should not be used as a regression technique anymore. However, alternative methods require first to quantify components of uncertainty in pressure and air flow rate measurements. This work aims at quantifying the uncertainty in zero-flow pressure approximation, which is mainly due to short-term fluctuation of wind speed and direction. This has been done by statistically analysing the uncertainty indicator of 40 zero-flow pressure tests performed on 30 different units on eight different sites in Brussels. First, the analysis showed that this uncertainty could be reduced by increasing the period of measurement used to compute zero-flow pressure approximation. Second, it shows that the standard deviation of zero-flow pressure measurements was the variable with the most significant impact on the quality of the zero-flow pressure approximation. Third, it provides three different linear models to predict uncertainty as a function of different variables. This study experienced some limitations due to the available sample of tested units. These limitations lead to important further work: the validation of the model on another sample of buildings and its adaptation if needed. Further work should also focus on integrating these results on the uncertainty in envelope pressure measurements and on the uncertainty in airtightness estimation of the building.
零流压力近似中不确定性的量化
多位作者提出,在进行风机增压试验时,不应再使用普通最小二乘(OLS)方法作为回归技术。然而,替代方法需要首先量化压力和空气流量测量中的不确定度成分。本文旨在量化零流压力近似中主要由风速和风向的短期波动引起的不确定性。这是通过统计分析在布鲁塞尔8个不同地点的30个不同装置上进行的40次零流量压力测试的不确定性指标来完成的。首先,分析表明,可以通过增加用于计算零流压力近似的测量周期来降低这种不确定性。其次,零流量压力测量的标准差是影响零流量压力近似质量最显著的变量。第三,它提供了三种不同的线性模型来预测不确定性作为不同变量的函数。由于测试单元的可用样本,本研究经历了一些局限性。这些限制导致了重要的进一步工作:在另一个建筑样本上验证模型,并在需要时进行调整。进一步的工作还应侧重于将这些结果整合到围护结构压力测量的不确定性和建筑物气密性估计的不确定性上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Ventilation
International Journal of Ventilation CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This is a peer reviewed journal aimed at providing the latest information on research and application. Topics include: • New ideas concerned with the development or application of ventilation; • Validated case studies demonstrating the performance of ventilation strategies; • Information on needs and solutions for specific building types including: offices, dwellings, schools, hospitals, parking garages, urban buildings and recreational buildings etc; • Developments in numerical methods; • Measurement techniques; • Related issues in which the impact of ventilation plays an important role (e.g. the interaction of ventilation with air quality, health and comfort); • Energy issues related to ventilation (e.g. low energy systems, ventilation heating and cooling loss); • Driving forces (weather data, fan performance etc).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信