"Parirás com Dor": a violência obstétrica revisitada

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Maíra Soares Ferreira, Eliane Gonçalves
{"title":"\"Parirás com Dor\": a violência obstétrica revisitada","authors":"Maíra Soares Ferreira, Eliane Gonçalves","doi":"10.5216/SEC.V23.60230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faced with a social context in which instrumental births predominate, via cesarean surgery, in private hospitals and the “cascade of interventions” in vaginal deliveries in Brazilian public hospitals, the women’smovement marked the beginning of the 21st century with the name “obstetric violence”. The understanding of obstetric violence ranges from physical, psychological, verbal, symbolic, sexual aggressions to negligencein care, discrimination, excessive and inappropriate medicalization, adherence to obstetric practices that are not recommended, painful, harmful and not based on scientific evidence which are experienced at the time of pregnancy, childbirth, birth and postpartum. Aspects of this violence - with imposition of pain, suffering and preventable deaths - are legitimized by obstetric science and authorized by the State as assistanceto sexual and reproductive health. We argue that obstetric violence is a misogynistic act of punishment for women, the result of centuries of denial of their sexuality and the ability to decide. The purpose of the article is to reflect on how this political authorization was given to violate the bodies of women, as well as their naturalization and invisibility justified by science and certain obstetric practices. Being part of a broader research, historical analyzes of feminist nature were privileged, whose collection of knowledge allowed to track the process of elaboration of the concept and show how the intrinsic relations between childbirth and State policies, through the different assistance - public and private - coordinate the discipline over theexpropriated bodies of women.","PeriodicalId":38915,"journal":{"name":"Sociedade e Cultura","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociedade e Cultura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/SEC.V23.60230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Faced with a social context in which instrumental births predominate, via cesarean surgery, in private hospitals and the “cascade of interventions” in vaginal deliveries in Brazilian public hospitals, the women’smovement marked the beginning of the 21st century with the name “obstetric violence”. The understanding of obstetric violence ranges from physical, psychological, verbal, symbolic, sexual aggressions to negligencein care, discrimination, excessive and inappropriate medicalization, adherence to obstetric practices that are not recommended, painful, harmful and not based on scientific evidence which are experienced at the time of pregnancy, childbirth, birth and postpartum. Aspects of this violence - with imposition of pain, suffering and preventable deaths - are legitimized by obstetric science and authorized by the State as assistanceto sexual and reproductive health. We argue that obstetric violence is a misogynistic act of punishment for women, the result of centuries of denial of their sexuality and the ability to decide. The purpose of the article is to reflect on how this political authorization was given to violate the bodies of women, as well as their naturalization and invisibility justified by science and certain obstetric practices. Being part of a broader research, historical analyzes of feminist nature were privileged, whose collection of knowledge allowed to track the process of elaboration of the concept and show how the intrinsic relations between childbirth and State policies, through the different assistance - public and private - coordinate the discipline over theexpropriated bodies of women.
“pariras with pain”:重新审视产科暴力
面对私人医院通过剖宫产手术辅助分娩占主导地位以及巴西公立医院通过阴道分娩进行"一连串干预"的社会背景,妇女运动以"产科暴力"为名,标志着21世纪的开始。对产科暴力的理解范围从身体、心理、语言、象征、性侵犯到护理疏忽、歧视、过度和不适当的医疗、坚持不推荐的、痛苦的、有害的、没有科学证据的产科做法,这些做法在怀孕、分娩、分娩和产后经历过。这种暴力的各个方面——造成痛苦、折磨和可预防的死亡——被产科科学合法化,并被国家授权为性健康和生殖健康援助。我们认为,产科暴力是对女性的一种厌恶女性的惩罚行为,是几个世纪以来否认她们的性取向和决定能力的结果。这篇文章的目的是反思这种政治授权是如何被授予侵犯妇女身体的,以及科学和某些产科实践证明她们的入籍和不可见性是合理的。作为更广泛的研究的一部分,对女权主义本质的历史分析是有特权的,其知识的收集允许跟踪这一概念的阐述过程,并表明生育与国家政策之间的内在关系如何通过不同的援助-公共和私人-协调对征用妇女身体的纪律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociedade e Cultura
Sociedade e Cultura Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信