Celal Nuri: young Turk modernizer and Muslim nationalist

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Erdem Sönmez
{"title":"Celal Nuri: young Turk modernizer and Muslim nationalist","authors":"Erdem Sönmez","doi":"10.1080/14683849.2022.2093109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"second step or level one should also recognize a civilizational perspective and standpoint. From the very beginning, American enterprise concentrated not on narrow American interests but conveying Western values and perceptions to a Muslim country. Thus the social scientists, economists, businesspeople, and politicians who cooperated with the Rockefeller or Ford Foundations were not mere agents of American interests in Turkey but the agents of Westernization. However, this level of analysis is also not adequate. In the third level, especially revealed in the activities of John Marshall, the American endeavor had a two-sided dimension. American bureaucrats dealing with Turkey seemed to regard Turkey as a social and political experiment. Turkey with its particular history and distinct way of modernization became an important case to develop and understand. The USA on its part was trying to be a modern empire, and thus the achievements and failures of Ottomans and Turkey’s transition to a modern-Westernized republic stood as an interesting process that might shed light on the USA’s own goals and experiences. Learning about Turkish case this became important, necessitating both finding and investing in top scholars to study Turkish development. This process, however, became two-sided, as the desire of these new scholars coincided with the desire of American bureaucrats. This reciprocity brought out some complex results that no one could easily predict. Erken’s book is an important and valuable contribution, especially to understand American assumptions and intentions in dealing with Turkey. However, the question how Turkish scholars and bureaucrats received the American enterprise in Turkey is still open to research.","PeriodicalId":47071,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"640 - 642"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2022.2093109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

second step or level one should also recognize a civilizational perspective and standpoint. From the very beginning, American enterprise concentrated not on narrow American interests but conveying Western values and perceptions to a Muslim country. Thus the social scientists, economists, businesspeople, and politicians who cooperated with the Rockefeller or Ford Foundations were not mere agents of American interests in Turkey but the agents of Westernization. However, this level of analysis is also not adequate. In the third level, especially revealed in the activities of John Marshall, the American endeavor had a two-sided dimension. American bureaucrats dealing with Turkey seemed to regard Turkey as a social and political experiment. Turkey with its particular history and distinct way of modernization became an important case to develop and understand. The USA on its part was trying to be a modern empire, and thus the achievements and failures of Ottomans and Turkey’s transition to a modern-Westernized republic stood as an interesting process that might shed light on the USA’s own goals and experiences. Learning about Turkish case this became important, necessitating both finding and investing in top scholars to study Turkish development. This process, however, became two-sided, as the desire of these new scholars coincided with the desire of American bureaucrats. This reciprocity brought out some complex results that no one could easily predict. Erken’s book is an important and valuable contribution, especially to understand American assumptions and intentions in dealing with Turkey. However, the question how Turkish scholars and bureaucrats received the American enterprise in Turkey is still open to research.
Celal Nuri:年轻的土耳其现代化者和穆斯林民族主义者
第二步,即第一阶段,还应该认识到文明的视角和立场。从一开始,美国企业就不是专注于狭隘的美国利益,而是向一个穆斯林国家传达西方的价值观和观念。因此,与洛克菲勒或福特基金会合作的社会科学家、经济学家、商人和政治家不仅是美国在土耳其利益的代理人,而且是西方化的代理人。然而,这种水平的分析也是不够的。在第三个层面上,特别是在约翰·马歇尔的活动中,美国人的努力具有双面性。与土耳其打交道的美国官员似乎把土耳其视为一个社会和政治实验。土耳其以其特殊的历史和独特的现代化方式成为发展和理解的重要案例。美国试图成为一个现代帝国,因此奥斯曼帝国的成功和失败以及土耳其向现代西方化共和国的过渡是一个有趣的过程,可能会对美国自己的目标和经验有所启示。了解土耳其的情况变得非常重要,需要寻找和投资顶级学者来研究土耳其的发展。然而,这一过程是双面的,因为这些新学者的愿望与美国官僚的愿望不谋而合。这种相互作用带来了一些复杂的结果,没有人能轻易预测。厄肯的书是一个重要而有价值的贡献,尤其是在理解美国在处理土耳其问题上的设想和意图方面。然而,土耳其学者和官员如何接受美国企业在土耳其的问题仍有待研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Studies
Turkish Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Turkey is a country whose importance is rapidly growing in international affairs. A rapidly developing democratic state with a strong economy, complex society, active party system, and powerful armed forces, Turkey is playing an increasingly critical role in Europe, the Middle East, and the Caucasus. Given Turkey"s significance and the great interest in studying its history, politics, and foreign policy, Turkish Studies presents a forum for scholarly discussion on these topics and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信