Static Dipole Polarizability and Hyperpolarizability of F2 from Density Functional Theory Calculations. Similarities and Dissimilarities with Conventional ab initio Results

G. Maroulis, C. Makris
{"title":"Static Dipole Polarizability and Hyperpolarizability of F2 from Density Functional Theory Calculations. Similarities and Dissimilarities with Conventional ab initio Results","authors":"G. Maroulis, C. Makris","doi":"10.1163/157404006778330825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have calculated the bond-length dependence of the static dipole polarizability and hyperpolarizability of F2 relying on finite-field density functional calculations. At the internuclear separation of Re = 2.66816 a0 we obtain α/e2a02Eh−1 = 8.73 (B3LYP) and 8.60 (B3PW91), Δα/ e2a02Eh−1= 6.42 (B3LYP) and 6.32 (B3PW91), γ/ e4a04Eh−3 = 535 (B3LYP) and 503 (B3PW91) with a large, flexible [9s6p4d1f] basis set. For all three properties we observe that both B3LYPand B3PW91 yield values above the more accurate CCSD(T) results: CCSD(T) < B3PW91 < B3LYP. The discrepancy between DFT and conventional ab initio methods is more pronounced for the anisotropy of the (hyper)polarizability.","PeriodicalId":101169,"journal":{"name":"Soft Computing Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soft Computing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/157404006778330825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We have calculated the bond-length dependence of the static dipole polarizability and hyperpolarizability of F2 relying on finite-field density functional calculations. At the internuclear separation of Re = 2.66816 a0 we obtain α/e2a02Eh−1 = 8.73 (B3LYP) and 8.60 (B3PW91), Δα/ e2a02Eh−1= 6.42 (B3LYP) and 6.32 (B3PW91), γ/ e4a04Eh−3 = 535 (B3LYP) and 503 (B3PW91) with a large, flexible [9s6p4d1f] basis set. For all three properties we observe that both B3LYPand B3PW91 yield values above the more accurate CCSD(T) results: CCSD(T) < B3PW91 < B3LYP. The discrepancy between DFT and conventional ab initio methods is more pronounced for the anisotropy of the (hyper)polarizability.
密度泛函理论计算中F2的静态偶极极化率和超极化率。与传统从头算结果的异同
我们利用有限场密度泛函计算计算了F2的静态偶极极化率和超极化率的键长依赖关系。在Re = 2.66816 a0的核间分离处,我们得到α/e2a02Eh−1 = 8.73 (B3LYP)和8.60 (B3PW91), Δα/ e2a02Eh−1= 6.42 (B3LYP)和6.32 (B3PW91), γ/ e4a04Eh−3 = 535 (B3LYP)和503 (B3PW91),具有大而灵活的[9s6p4d1f]基集。对于所有这三个性质,我们观察到b3lypd和B3PW91的屈服值都高于更准确的CCSD(T)结果:CCSD(T) < B3PW91 < B3LYP。在(超)极化率的各向异性方面,DFT与传统从头算方法的差异更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信