A Risk-Based Design Approach for Uncased Pipe Under Roads and Railways

Hafeez Nathoo, M. Nessim, M. Stephens
{"title":"A Risk-Based Design Approach for Uncased Pipe Under Roads and Railways","authors":"Hafeez Nathoo, M. Nessim, M. Stephens","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-87102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A risk-based pressure design approach has been developed for uncased pipe under roads and railways. Similar to the approach currently used in Canadian Standard Association’s Standard Z662, the approach uses a set of hoop stress factors to calculate the minimum wall thickness from the pipe’s pressure, diameter, and specified minimum yield strength. The hoop stress factors were calibrated to meet specified reliability targets considering the risk factors specific to roads and railways, which include elevated probabilities of mechanical damage due to higher construction activity rates, safety impact on road users, and potential costs of traffic interruption in case of a pipeline failure. The hoop stress factors are defined as a function of the safety class, which is determined according to the approach described in a companion IPC paper.\n This paper describes the development approach and provides a comparison between its results and the designs obtained from the current CSA Z662 approach. An analysis confirming adequacy of the resulting wall thicknesses to withstand normal traffic loads is also presented. The approach is being proposed as an alternative to the hoop stress factors currently used in CSA Z662.","PeriodicalId":21327,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A risk-based pressure design approach has been developed for uncased pipe under roads and railways. Similar to the approach currently used in Canadian Standard Association’s Standard Z662, the approach uses a set of hoop stress factors to calculate the minimum wall thickness from the pipe’s pressure, diameter, and specified minimum yield strength. The hoop stress factors were calibrated to meet specified reliability targets considering the risk factors specific to roads and railways, which include elevated probabilities of mechanical damage due to higher construction activity rates, safety impact on road users, and potential costs of traffic interruption in case of a pipeline failure. The hoop stress factors are defined as a function of the safety class, which is determined according to the approach described in a companion IPC paper. This paper describes the development approach and provides a comparison between its results and the designs obtained from the current CSA Z662 approach. An analysis confirming adequacy of the resulting wall thicknesses to withstand normal traffic loads is also presented. The approach is being proposed as an alternative to the hoop stress factors currently used in CSA Z662.
基于风险的公路铁路无套管管道设计方法
基于风险的压力设计方法适用于公路和铁路下的无套管管道。与加拿大标准协会Z662标准中目前使用的方法类似,该方法使用一组环向应力因子,根据管道的压力、直径和规定的最小屈服强度计算最小壁厚。考虑到公路和铁路的特定风险因素,包括较高的施工活动率导致机械损伤的可能性增加,对道路使用者的安全影响,以及管道故障时交通中断的潜在成本,对环向应力因子进行了校准,以满足指定的可靠性目标。环向应力因子被定义为安全等级的函数,安全等级是根据IPC相关论文中描述的方法确定的。本文介绍了该开发方法,并将其结果与现有CSA Z662方法的设计结果进行了比较。还提出了一项分析,证实所得到的壁厚足以承受正常的交通载荷。该方法被提议作为CSA Z662中目前使用的环向应力因子的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信