M. Buuren, J. Alfredsson, B. Mioduszewska, S. Tebbich, A. Bayern
{"title":"Bending and Unbending of Tools by New Caledonian Crows (Corvus Moneduloides) in a Problem-Solving Context","authors":"M. Buuren, J. Alfredsson, B. Mioduszewska, S. Tebbich, A. Bayern","doi":"10.26451/ABC.08.02.07.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New Caledonian crows (NCCs) are proficient tool manufacturers and flexible problem solvers. A study reporting innovative hook bending by a captive individual in 2002 (Weir et al., 2002), has since been cited as a remarkable case of causal reasoning in animals. Recently, however, tool bending has been found to form part of the species’ natural behavioral repertoire. Yet, further studies examining the flexibility of this behavior in controlled novel problem-solving contexts are lacking. We tested 17 captive NCCs, in one tool bending and three unbending problem-solving experiments. In the first study, two groups of five subjects were trained to select inflexible straight or hooked tools respectively for retrieving food from an apparatus. In the subsequent test, the crows were supplied with the wrong, but now pliable, type of tool. Three subjects made hooks while one subject straightened tools consistently. In the second study, 13 subjects, including five from Study 1, were tested. Ten subjects received an unbending task with a Z-shaped tool without prior training. Both angles needed to be straightened for the tool to become sufficiently long for reward retrieval. Four subjects solved the task at least once, and two did so consistently. Eight subjects, including the previous solvers, were challenged with yet another apparatus, requiring novel unbending behavior. One crow succeeded in both unbending tasks consistently. Our results show that NCCs can flexibly bend or unbend pliant material to create tools for solving novel tasks. The underlying cognitive mechanisms seemingly varied across individuals although trial-and-error learning prevailed.","PeriodicalId":31700,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behavior and Cognition","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behavior and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26451/ABC.08.02.07.2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
New Caledonian crows (NCCs) are proficient tool manufacturers and flexible problem solvers. A study reporting innovative hook bending by a captive individual in 2002 (Weir et al., 2002), has since been cited as a remarkable case of causal reasoning in animals. Recently, however, tool bending has been found to form part of the species’ natural behavioral repertoire. Yet, further studies examining the flexibility of this behavior in controlled novel problem-solving contexts are lacking. We tested 17 captive NCCs, in one tool bending and three unbending problem-solving experiments. In the first study, two groups of five subjects were trained to select inflexible straight or hooked tools respectively for retrieving food from an apparatus. In the subsequent test, the crows were supplied with the wrong, but now pliable, type of tool. Three subjects made hooks while one subject straightened tools consistently. In the second study, 13 subjects, including five from Study 1, were tested. Ten subjects received an unbending task with a Z-shaped tool without prior training. Both angles needed to be straightened for the tool to become sufficiently long for reward retrieval. Four subjects solved the task at least once, and two did so consistently. Eight subjects, including the previous solvers, were challenged with yet another apparatus, requiring novel unbending behavior. One crow succeeded in both unbending tasks consistently. Our results show that NCCs can flexibly bend or unbend pliant material to create tools for solving novel tasks. The underlying cognitive mechanisms seemingly varied across individuals although trial-and-error learning prevailed.
新喀里多尼亚乌鸦(NCCs)是熟练的工具制造商和灵活的问题解决者。2002年,一项研究报告了圈养个体弯曲钩子的创新行为(Weir et al., 2002),此后被引用为动物因果推理的一个显著案例。然而,最近,人们发现工具弯曲是该物种自然行为的一部分。然而,进一步研究这种行为在受控的新问题解决环境中的灵活性是缺乏的。我们在一个工具弯曲和三个不弯曲的问题解决实验中测试了17个自制ncc。在第一项研究中,两组五名受试者分别接受训练,选择不灵活的直的或钩的工具从一个装置中取出食物。在随后的测试中,给乌鸦提供了错误的,但现在柔韧的工具。三名受试者制作挂钩,而一名受试者持续拉直工具。在第二项研究中,13名受试者接受了测试,其中包括研究1中的5名受试者。10名受试者在没有事先训练的情况下接受了使用z形工具的不弯曲任务。这两个角度都需要矫正,以使工具变得足够长,以便获得奖励。四名受试者至少完成了一次任务,两名受试者一直都能完成任务。包括之前的解决者在内的8名受试者被要求使用另一种装置,要求他们做出新的不弯曲行为。一只乌鸦成功地完成了这两项任务。我们的研究结果表明,ncc可以灵活地弯曲或不弯曲柔性材料,以创建解决新任务的工具。尽管试错学习盛行,但潜在的认知机制似乎因人而异。