Evaluation of Groundwater Environment Carrying Capacity Based on Catastrophe Theory

Nanxiang Chen, Ji-hong Qu, Jianxin Xu, Zhi-ping Li, Li Yang
{"title":"Evaluation of Groundwater Environment Carrying Capacity Based on Catastrophe Theory","authors":"Nanxiang Chen, Ji-hong Qu, Jianxin Xu, Zhi-ping Li, Li Yang","doi":"10.1109/ICBBE.2010.5515459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluation of groundwater environment carrying capacity is a multi-objective, multi-criteria and multi-level comprehensive issue. Evaluation index system of groundwater environment carrying capacity was built and divided into some subsystems in accordance with each index's inherent stratification link. Every index's effect on carrying capacity system was obtained by normalization operations catastrophe-based, so the ultimate value of fuzzy membership function catastrophe-based, which explains the groundwater environment carrying capacity, can been calculated from the lowermost layer to the topmost layer. The method was applied to evaluate groundwater environment carrying capacity in People's Victory Canal Irrigation District. In order to reveal outer and inner factor's effect to groundwater system, evaluation index system was divided into 3 kinds of top-level subsystem, i.e., the development and utilization degree of water resources, economy society and eco-environment subsystem, which include 17 kinds of bottom-level sub-index. The comprehensive evaluation result catastrophe-based is 0.9282, 0.9212, and 0.9150 in 1995, 2000, and 2005 separately, and groundwater environment carrying capacity are all weak and shows a downtrend year by year along with rapid economy expanding. The result reveals that it is a fact that groundwater resources and eco-environment in irrigation district is increasingly prominent. As it is not necessary to define the weight of evaluation indexes in dynamic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model catastrophe-based, subjectivity of the decision-making has been reduced. The examples show that the method in this paper is reasonable and feasible by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method's validation.","PeriodicalId":6396,"journal":{"name":"2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":"25 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBBE.2010.5515459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Evaluation of groundwater environment carrying capacity is a multi-objective, multi-criteria and multi-level comprehensive issue. Evaluation index system of groundwater environment carrying capacity was built and divided into some subsystems in accordance with each index's inherent stratification link. Every index's effect on carrying capacity system was obtained by normalization operations catastrophe-based, so the ultimate value of fuzzy membership function catastrophe-based, which explains the groundwater environment carrying capacity, can been calculated from the lowermost layer to the topmost layer. The method was applied to evaluate groundwater environment carrying capacity in People's Victory Canal Irrigation District. In order to reveal outer and inner factor's effect to groundwater system, evaluation index system was divided into 3 kinds of top-level subsystem, i.e., the development and utilization degree of water resources, economy society and eco-environment subsystem, which include 17 kinds of bottom-level sub-index. The comprehensive evaluation result catastrophe-based is 0.9282, 0.9212, and 0.9150 in 1995, 2000, and 2005 separately, and groundwater environment carrying capacity are all weak and shows a downtrend year by year along with rapid economy expanding. The result reveals that it is a fact that groundwater resources and eco-environment in irrigation district is increasingly prominent. As it is not necessary to define the weight of evaluation indexes in dynamic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model catastrophe-based, subjectivity of the decision-making has been reduced. The examples show that the method in this paper is reasonable and feasible by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method's validation.
基于突变理论的地下水环境承载力评价
地下水环境承载力评价是一个多目标、多标准、多层次的综合问题。建立了地下水环境承载力评价指标体系,并按照各指标的内在分层联系将其划分为若干个子系统。通过基于灾变的归一化运算得到各指标对地下水环境承载力系统的影响,从而可以从最下层到最上层计算解释地下水环境承载力的模糊隶属函数灾变的极值。应用该方法对人民胜利渠灌区地下水环境承载力进行了评价。为了揭示外部因素和内部因素对地下水系统的影响,将评价指标体系划分为水资源开发利用程度、经济社会和生态环境3个顶层子系统,其中包括17个底层子指标。1995年、2000年和2005年基于灾变的综合评价结果分别为0.9282、0.9212和0.9150,随着经济的快速发展,地下水环境承载力均较弱,并呈逐年下降趋势。结果表明,灌区地下水资源和生态环境问题日益突出是一个事实。基于灾变的动态模糊综合评价模型由于不需要确定评价指标的权重,降低了决策的主观性。实例通过模糊综合评判法的验证,证明了本文方法的合理性和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信