{"title":"Little Things and Big Challenges: Information Privacy and the Internet of Things","authors":"Hillary Brill, Scott Jones","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3188958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe Internet of Things (IoT) is part of our lives in countless ways- some are welcome and intentional, such as trackable fitness devices, home security alert systems, or cars that can be unlocked and started remotely; others are unintentional and may cause concern to consumers, such as connected toys that can listen to our kids, or technologies capable of tracking our whereabouts or our shopping habits without our knowledge. The rapid growth of the IoT has prompted incredible technological advances along with thorny regulatory issues, specifically in the area of information privacy. Traditional regulators of privacy, specifically the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), have stretched to apply traditional tools to regulate unprecedented technological advances and the privacy challenges they bring. An analysis of the latest FTC cases and outcomes reveals an independent agency retooling investigative and enforcement methods and priorities to establish new expectations for how fair information practices and principles will be applied to new technologies.The FTC, like the technological advances it has stretched to keep pace with, has been increasingly progressive in its recent decision-making terminology. This Article uses recent, seminal FTC cases and outcomes to demonstrate how the FTC has developed a new information privacy framework, most recently expressed as the concept of \"unfair tracking,\" by modifying traditional legal concepts. The FTC has significantly expanded its role as the primary reviewer of information privacy matters raised by the IoT, while attempting to balance a philosophy not to impede the advance of the technology comprising the IoT. This Article reviews recent FTC efforts to regulate the IoT and provides critical commentary on how the FTc might proceed.To best understand the genesis of recent FTC actions on IoT data collection, Part i describes what makes up the ioT, how pervasive the ioT has become in our lives and, perhaps most importantly, how it will continue to innovate at a rapid pace. Parts II and III of this Article describe some unprecedented benefits and unprecedented challenges confronting regulators of information privacy in today's IoT age, including how to protect individual privacy rights without undermining innovation and the promise the connected world of the IoT brings.Part IV provides an in-depth critical review of four key FTC cases attempting to strike this sort of balance: In re Nomi Technologies, Inc.,1 United States v. InMobi Pte Ltd..,2 In re Turn, Inc.,5 and FTC v. VlZIOi Initially, the FTC applied its traditional section 5 \"deception\" jurisprudence in a novel way to advance traditional notions of privacy, but it has recently transitioned to a new paradigm in the form of a cause of action for \"unfair tracking,\" starting with VIZIO. However, this Article concludes that this new standard could prove either too anemic or, alternatively, overbroad, without proper shepherding by the FTC. It is only with proactive guidance to supplement its traditional reactive enforcement that the little things of the IoT can overcome the big information privacy challenges the IoT creates.I. IoT: A Big Connection of Little ThingsThe term \"Internet of Things\" (IoT) has been defined in a variety of ways. In the broadest sense, the phrase \"encompasses everything connected to the [I]nternet, but it is increasingly being used to define objects that 'talk' to each other.\"5 A simple definition of the IoT is \"the concept of basically connecting any device with an on and off switch to the Internet (and/or to each other).\"6 Oxford Dictionaries define it as \"[t] he interconnection via the Internet of computing devices embedded in everyday objects, enabling them to send and receive data.\"7 Others define the IoT as \"the ability of one device to connect to other devices through wireless data infrastructure\"8 or \"a system of devices and things that are implanted with sensors, software and electronics to initiate the exchange and collection of data and information. …","PeriodicalId":80193,"journal":{"name":"The American University law review","volume":"3 1","pages":"1183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American University law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3188958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
IntroductionThe Internet of Things (IoT) is part of our lives in countless ways- some are welcome and intentional, such as trackable fitness devices, home security alert systems, or cars that can be unlocked and started remotely; others are unintentional and may cause concern to consumers, such as connected toys that can listen to our kids, or technologies capable of tracking our whereabouts or our shopping habits without our knowledge. The rapid growth of the IoT has prompted incredible technological advances along with thorny regulatory issues, specifically in the area of information privacy. Traditional regulators of privacy, specifically the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), have stretched to apply traditional tools to regulate unprecedented technological advances and the privacy challenges they bring. An analysis of the latest FTC cases and outcomes reveals an independent agency retooling investigative and enforcement methods and priorities to establish new expectations for how fair information practices and principles will be applied to new technologies.The FTC, like the technological advances it has stretched to keep pace with, has been increasingly progressive in its recent decision-making terminology. This Article uses recent, seminal FTC cases and outcomes to demonstrate how the FTC has developed a new information privacy framework, most recently expressed as the concept of "unfair tracking," by modifying traditional legal concepts. The FTC has significantly expanded its role as the primary reviewer of information privacy matters raised by the IoT, while attempting to balance a philosophy not to impede the advance of the technology comprising the IoT. This Article reviews recent FTC efforts to regulate the IoT and provides critical commentary on how the FTc might proceed.To best understand the genesis of recent FTC actions on IoT data collection, Part i describes what makes up the ioT, how pervasive the ioT has become in our lives and, perhaps most importantly, how it will continue to innovate at a rapid pace. Parts II and III of this Article describe some unprecedented benefits and unprecedented challenges confronting regulators of information privacy in today's IoT age, including how to protect individual privacy rights without undermining innovation and the promise the connected world of the IoT brings.Part IV provides an in-depth critical review of four key FTC cases attempting to strike this sort of balance: In re Nomi Technologies, Inc.,1 United States v. InMobi Pte Ltd..,2 In re Turn, Inc.,5 and FTC v. VlZIOi Initially, the FTC applied its traditional section 5 "deception" jurisprudence in a novel way to advance traditional notions of privacy, but it has recently transitioned to a new paradigm in the form of a cause of action for "unfair tracking," starting with VIZIO. However, this Article concludes that this new standard could prove either too anemic or, alternatively, overbroad, without proper shepherding by the FTC. It is only with proactive guidance to supplement its traditional reactive enforcement that the little things of the IoT can overcome the big information privacy challenges the IoT creates.I. IoT: A Big Connection of Little ThingsThe term "Internet of Things" (IoT) has been defined in a variety of ways. In the broadest sense, the phrase "encompasses everything connected to the [I]nternet, but it is increasingly being used to define objects that 'talk' to each other."5 A simple definition of the IoT is "the concept of basically connecting any device with an on and off switch to the Internet (and/or to each other)."6 Oxford Dictionaries define it as "[t] he interconnection via the Internet of computing devices embedded in everyday objects, enabling them to send and receive data."7 Others define the IoT as "the ability of one device to connect to other devices through wireless data infrastructure"8 or "a system of devices and things that are implanted with sensors, software and electronics to initiate the exchange and collection of data and information. …
物联网(IoT)以无数种方式成为我们生活的一部分——有些是受欢迎的,也是有意为之的,比如可追踪的健身设备、家庭安全警报系统,或者可以远程解锁和启动的汽车;还有一些是无意的,可能会引起消费者的担忧,比如可以听我们孩子说话的联网玩具,或者能够在我们不知情的情况下追踪我们的行踪或购物习惯的技术。物联网的快速发展带来了令人难以置信的技术进步,同时也带来了棘手的监管问题,特别是在信息隐私领域。传统的隐私监管机构,特别是联邦贸易委员会(FTC),已经开始运用传统工具来监管前所未有的技术进步及其带来的隐私挑战。对联邦贸易委员会最新案例和结果的分析表明,一个独立机构正在重新调整调查和执法方法和优先事项,以建立对如何将公平信息实践和原则应用于新技术的新期望。联邦贸易委员会,就像它一直在努力跟上技术进步的步伐一样,在最近的决策术语上也越来越进步。本文使用最近的、开创性的FTC案例和结果来展示FTC如何通过修改传统的法律概念来开发新的信息隐私框架,最近被表达为“不公平跟踪”的概念。公平交易委员会已经大大扩大了其作为物联网提出的信息隐私问题的主要审查者的作用,同时试图平衡一种不阻碍物联网技术进步的理念。本文回顾了联邦贸易委员会最近在监管物联网方面的努力,并就联邦贸易委员会可能如何进行提供了批判性的评论。为了更好地理解美国联邦贸易委员会最近在物联网数据收集方面采取的行动的起源,第一部分描述了物联网的组成,物联网在我们生活中的普及程度,也许最重要的是,它将如何继续快速创新。本文的第二部分和第三部分描述了当今物联网时代信息隐私监管机构面临的一些前所未有的好处和前所未有的挑战,包括如何在不损害创新和物联网互联世界带来的承诺的情况下保护个人隐私权。第四部分对试图达到这种平衡的四个关键FTC案例进行了深入的批判性审查:在re Nomi Technologies, Inc.,1 United States诉InMobi Pte Ltd.。最初,FTC以一种新颖的方式应用其传统的第5条“欺骗”法理学来推进传统的隐私概念,但它最近以“不公平跟踪”的诉因形式过渡到一种新的范式,从VIZIO开始。然而,本文的结论是,如果没有联邦贸易委员会的适当指导,这个新标准可能会被证明过于缺乏,或者过于宽泛。只有在积极主动的指导下,辅以传统的被动执法,物联网的小事才能克服物联网带来的巨大信息隐私挑战。物联网:小事物的大连接物联网(IoT)一词有各种各样的定义。从最广泛的意义上讲,这个短语“包括所有与互联网相连的东西,但它越来越多地被用来定义相互‘交谈’的对象。”物联网的一个简单定义是“基本上将任何具有开/关开关的设备连接到互联网(和/或彼此)的概念。”牛津词典将其定义为“嵌入日常物品中的计算设备通过互联网相互连接,使它们能够发送和接收数据。”另一些人将物联网定义为“一个设备通过无线数据基础设施连接到其他设备的能力”8或“植入传感器、软件和电子设备的设备和事物系统,以启动数据和信息的交换和收集。”...