A review of productivity in strawberry: do the plants need larger canopies, more flowers, or higher CO2 assimilation for higher yields?

Christopher Michael Menzel
{"title":"A review of productivity in strawberry: do the plants need larger canopies, more flowers, or higher CO2 assimilation for higher yields?","authors":"Christopher Michael Menzel","doi":"10.1080/14620316.2022.2077240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Productivity in strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) is dependent on the production of new crowns, leaves and inflorescences, with fruit growth dependent on CO2 assimilation in the leaves. The yields of new cultivars peaked in the 1970s and 1980s in many locations, possibly because of the focus of breeding on fruit quality and other plant traits and the loss of diversity across commercial breeding populations. It is not known if higher yields are related to higher plant growth or higher CO2 assimilation in the leaves. This review assessed whether cultivars need larger canopies, more flowers, or higher CO2 assimilation for higher yields. There were moderate to strong relationships between plant growth or yield, and net CO2 assimilation per leaf area (P < 0.05; R 2 = 0.42 to 0.84) or the stability of net CO2 assimilation (P = 0.052, R 2 = 0.48) across cultivars and environments. Carbon dioxide enrichment increased mean (± SE) net CO2 assimilation by 88 ± 40% compared with plants at ambient and increased yield by 112 ± 73%. There was a linear decrease in yield as light levels decreased below full sun (P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.66), and linear decreases in yield the longer two cultivars were grown under 20% full sun (P = 0.002, R 2 = 0.84; P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.86). Daily gross primary productivity (GPP, mol CO2 per m2) estimated by measuring the changes in the concentration of CO2 above a crop was still increasing when the PAR (photosynthetic active radiation) was above 2,000 µmol per m2 per s (rectangular hyperbola models, R 2s = 0.44 or 0.72). There were linear decreases in yield as the number of leaves (P < 0.05, R 2 = 0.70 to 0.90), crowns (P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.82) or flowers (P < 0.05, R 2 = 0.51) were removed from plants. There were moderate to strong phenotypic correlations (R P > 0.50, N = 47 studies) and weak correlations (R P < 0.50, N = 69 studies) between yield and vegetative growth and flowering. Estimate of broad- and narrow-sense heritability for canopy growth and yield are low to moderate (H 2 and h 2 = 0.15 to 0.40). Cultivars produce high yields in different ways, suggesting that breeders consider the relationship between yield and plant architecture when developing cultivars. Initial experiments should include data on the number of leaves, crowns and inflorescences per plant. Subsequent experiments should include data on leaf area index (LAI) and/or LAD (leaf area density) using image analysis technology. More research is required to determine the value of measuring net CO2 assimilation per leaf area, with current technology time-consuming and the results variable. The use of image analyses to characterise the canopy will assist the development of high-yielding cultivars. Genome-wide association (GWA) and genomic prediction (GP) will also accelerate the identification of high-yielding populations and individuals.","PeriodicalId":22704,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology","volume":"43 1","pages":"674 - 696"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2022.2077240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Productivity in strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) is dependent on the production of new crowns, leaves and inflorescences, with fruit growth dependent on CO2 assimilation in the leaves. The yields of new cultivars peaked in the 1970s and 1980s in many locations, possibly because of the focus of breeding on fruit quality and other plant traits and the loss of diversity across commercial breeding populations. It is not known if higher yields are related to higher plant growth or higher CO2 assimilation in the leaves. This review assessed whether cultivars need larger canopies, more flowers, or higher CO2 assimilation for higher yields. There were moderate to strong relationships between plant growth or yield, and net CO2 assimilation per leaf area (P < 0.05; R 2 = 0.42 to 0.84) or the stability of net CO2 assimilation (P = 0.052, R 2 = 0.48) across cultivars and environments. Carbon dioxide enrichment increased mean (± SE) net CO2 assimilation by 88 ± 40% compared with plants at ambient and increased yield by 112 ± 73%. There was a linear decrease in yield as light levels decreased below full sun (P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.66), and linear decreases in yield the longer two cultivars were grown under 20% full sun (P = 0.002, R 2 = 0.84; P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.86). Daily gross primary productivity (GPP, mol CO2 per m2) estimated by measuring the changes in the concentration of CO2 above a crop was still increasing when the PAR (photosynthetic active radiation) was above 2,000 µmol per m2 per s (rectangular hyperbola models, R 2s = 0.44 or 0.72). There were linear decreases in yield as the number of leaves (P < 0.05, R 2 = 0.70 to 0.90), crowns (P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.82) or flowers (P < 0.05, R 2 = 0.51) were removed from plants. There were moderate to strong phenotypic correlations (R P > 0.50, N = 47 studies) and weak correlations (R P < 0.50, N = 69 studies) between yield and vegetative growth and flowering. Estimate of broad- and narrow-sense heritability for canopy growth and yield are low to moderate (H 2 and h 2 = 0.15 to 0.40). Cultivars produce high yields in different ways, suggesting that breeders consider the relationship between yield and plant architecture when developing cultivars. Initial experiments should include data on the number of leaves, crowns and inflorescences per plant. Subsequent experiments should include data on leaf area index (LAI) and/or LAD (leaf area density) using image analysis technology. More research is required to determine the value of measuring net CO2 assimilation per leaf area, with current technology time-consuming and the results variable. The use of image analyses to characterise the canopy will assist the development of high-yielding cultivars. Genome-wide association (GWA) and genomic prediction (GP) will also accelerate the identification of high-yielding populations and individuals.
对草莓生产力的回顾:为了更高的产量,植物是否需要更大的冠层,更多的花,或者更高的二氧化碳吸收?
草莓(Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.)的生产力依赖于新冠、叶片和花序的产生,果实的生长依赖于叶片中的二氧化碳同化。在许多地方,新品种的产量在20世纪70年代和80年代达到顶峰,可能是因为育种的重点是果实质量和其他植物性状,以及商业育种群体多样性的丧失。目前尚不清楚较高的产量是否与较高的植物生长或叶片中较高的二氧化碳同化有关。这篇综述评估了品种是否需要更大的冠层、更多的花或更高的二氧化碳同化来获得更高的产量。植物生长或产量与每叶面积净CO2同化呈中~强相关(P < 0.05;r2 = 0.42 ~ 0.84)或不同品种和环境间CO2净同化的稳定性(P = 0.052, r2 = 0.48)。与环境下的植物相比,二氧化碳富集使平均(±SE)净CO2同化提高88±40%,产量提高112±73%。在全日照条件下,随着光照水平的降低,产量呈线性下降(P < 0.001, r2 = 0.66);在20%全日照条件下,两个品种生长时间越长,产量呈线性下降(P = 0.002, r2 = 0.84;P < 0.001, r2 = 0.86)。当PAR(光合有效辐射)高于2000µmol / m2 / s时,通过测量作物上方CO2浓度变化估算的日总初级生产力(GPP, mol CO2 / m2)仍在增加(矩形双曲线模型,r2 = 0.44或0.72)。除叶数(P < 0.05, r2 = 0.70 ~ 0.90)、冠数(P < 0.001, r2 = 0.82)和花数(P < 0.05, r2 = 0.51)均呈线性下降。产量与营养生长和开花存在中强相关(R P > 0.50, N = 47)和弱相关(R P < 0.50, N = 69)。冠层生长和产量的广义和狭义遗传力估计值为低至中等(h2和h2 = 0.15至0.40)。品种以不同的方式获得高产,这表明育种者在培育品种时考虑了产量与植株结构之间的关系。最初的实验应包括每株植物的叶子、冠和花序的数量。后续实验应包括叶面积指数(LAI)和/或LAD(叶面积密度)数据,使用图像分析技术。要确定测量每叶面积净CO2同化的价值,还需要进行更多的研究,目前的技术耗时且结果多变。利用图像分析来表征冠层将有助于高产品种的开发。全基因组关联(GWA)和基因组预测(GP)也将加速高产群体和高产个体的鉴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信