"We Are Here": Race, Gender, and Spaces of "Common Ground" in the Works of John Edgar Wideman, bell hooks, and Jesmyn Ward

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
MELUS Pub Date : 2021-09-27 DOI:10.1093/melus/mlab033
Joel Wendland-Liu
{"title":"\"We Are Here\": Race, Gender, and Spaces of \"Common Ground\" in the Works of John Edgar Wideman, bell hooks, and Jesmyn Ward","authors":"Joel Wendland-Liu","doi":"10.1093/melus/mlab033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Black-authored self-writing serves multiple liberating functions, according to historian John Blassingame. In a short commentary for Black Scholar in 1973, Blassingame asserts the vitality of the black autobiographical tradition as a primary form of protest and intervention through the constitution of selfauthored images of black people. It provides “therapeutic value” by establishing the shared experience of racism and resistance between the author and reader and by affirming the humanity and complexity of black lives (“Black” 7). Black selfwriting also affords writers opportunities to establish their professional literary reputations, strengthen their composition skills, and construct black literary traditions. In other words, black autobiography helps produce a literary space of cultural self-determination. In Blassingame’s view, cultural self-determination assumes a beneficial character because it indexes, to cite his terminology, a “realistic” (2) culture of “uplift” (6) and “progress” (8) as a counter to negative, dehumanizing schemas that white supremacy systematically produces. This discourse of positivity, uplift, and progress emerges from the yoking of spatiality and the production of autobiographical narrative. Autobiography simultaneously measures and maps a space of social progress and uplift even as it performs the task of producing social progress and uplift; it crafts a history that anticipates its act of creation. It weaves the present into the fabric of the past to construct black identity and community in a dialectical relationship with resistance to oppression. Blassingame’s discussion of the role of self-writing as a tool of cultural selfdetermination anticipates the concept of “placemaking” theorized in the 2016 findings of a group of interdisciplinary scholars. In Marcus Anthony Hunter et al.’s study of black Chicago communities, placemaking derives from the use of “creative practices” (32) that highlight and reflect the “agency, intent, and ......................................................................................................","PeriodicalId":44959,"journal":{"name":"MELUS","volume":"24 1","pages":"188 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MELUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/melus/mlab033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black-authored self-writing serves multiple liberating functions, according to historian John Blassingame. In a short commentary for Black Scholar in 1973, Blassingame asserts the vitality of the black autobiographical tradition as a primary form of protest and intervention through the constitution of selfauthored images of black people. It provides “therapeutic value” by establishing the shared experience of racism and resistance between the author and reader and by affirming the humanity and complexity of black lives (“Black” 7). Black selfwriting also affords writers opportunities to establish their professional literary reputations, strengthen their composition skills, and construct black literary traditions. In other words, black autobiography helps produce a literary space of cultural self-determination. In Blassingame’s view, cultural self-determination assumes a beneficial character because it indexes, to cite his terminology, a “realistic” (2) culture of “uplift” (6) and “progress” (8) as a counter to negative, dehumanizing schemas that white supremacy systematically produces. This discourse of positivity, uplift, and progress emerges from the yoking of spatiality and the production of autobiographical narrative. Autobiography simultaneously measures and maps a space of social progress and uplift even as it performs the task of producing social progress and uplift; it crafts a history that anticipates its act of creation. It weaves the present into the fabric of the past to construct black identity and community in a dialectical relationship with resistance to oppression. Blassingame’s discussion of the role of self-writing as a tool of cultural selfdetermination anticipates the concept of “placemaking” theorized in the 2016 findings of a group of interdisciplinary scholars. In Marcus Anthony Hunter et al.’s study of black Chicago communities, placemaking derives from the use of “creative practices” (32) that highlight and reflect the “agency, intent, and ......................................................................................................
“我们在这里”:约翰·埃德加·怀德曼、贝尔·胡克斯和杰斯明·沃德作品中的种族、性别和“共同点”空间
历史学家John Blassingame认为,黑人撰写的自述具有多重解放功能。在1973年为《黑人学者》发表的一篇简短评论中,Blassingame断言黑人自传体传统的生命力是一种抗议和干预的主要形式通过黑人自创形象的构成。通过在作者和读者之间建立种族主义和抵抗的共同经历,通过肯定黑人生活的人性和复杂性,它提供了“治疗价值”(“black”7)。黑人自述也为作家提供了建立职业文学声誉、加强写作技巧和构建黑人文学传统的机会。换句话说,黑人自传有助于创造一个文化自决的文学空间。在Blassingame看来,文化自决具有一种有益的特征,因为用他的术语来说,它索引了一种“提升”和“进步”的“现实”文化,以对抗白人至上主义系统产生的消极的、非人性化的模式。这种积极、提升和进步的话语来自于空间的束缚和自传体叙事的产生。自传在完成创造社会进步和提升的任务的同时,也测量和描绘了社会进步和提升的空间;它创造了一段历史,预示着它的创造行为。它将现在编织到过去的结构中,在反抗压迫的辩证关系中构建黑人身份和社区。Blassingame对自我写作作为文化自决工具的作用的讨论,预测了2016年一群跨学科学者的研究结果中提出的“场所创造”概念。在安东尼马库斯猎人等的研究芝加哥的黑人社区,placemaking来源于使用“创造性实践”(32),突出和机构的意图,反映了” ......................................................................................................
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MELUS
MELUS LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信