Institutional Review of Dual Use Research of Concern to Support a Culture of Responsibility

P. Landon, N. Bergman, J. S. Goodrich, J. Osborn, J. PatrickFitch
{"title":"Institutional Review of Dual Use Research of Concern to Support a Culture of Responsibility","authors":"P. Landon, N. Bergman, J. S. Goodrich, J. Osborn, J. PatrickFitch","doi":"10.4172/2157-2526.1000130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) plays a central role in the US Biodefense community, and its unique mission has driven NBACC to make dual use research of concern (DURC) review a focus since inception. Review of research results prior to external release began in 2007 and an institution-level review of all projects that considers DURC was implemented beginning in 2011. The DURC review process at NBACC has evolved through four approaches—each with advantages and disadvantages—that are all consistent with the recently issued U.S. Government Policy for Institutional Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern. The current NBACC review process emphasizes Principal Investigator (PI) ownership and accountability, builds transparency in DURC review, and is specifically tailored to NBACC in order to reinforce an institutional culture of responsibility. This paper summarizes NBACC’s evolutionary process for effective DURC review.","PeriodicalId":15179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioterrorism and Biodefense","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioterrorism and Biodefense","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-2526.1000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) plays a central role in the US Biodefense community, and its unique mission has driven NBACC to make dual use research of concern (DURC) review a focus since inception. Review of research results prior to external release began in 2007 and an institution-level review of all projects that considers DURC was implemented beginning in 2011. The DURC review process at NBACC has evolved through four approaches—each with advantages and disadvantages—that are all consistent with the recently issued U.S. Government Policy for Institutional Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern. The current NBACC review process emphasizes Principal Investigator (PI) ownership and accountability, builds transparency in DURC review, and is specifically tailored to NBACC in order to reinforce an institutional culture of responsibility. This paper summarizes NBACC’s evolutionary process for effective DURC review.
关注双重用途研究以支持责任文化的机构审查
美国国家生物防御分析与对策中心(NBACC)在美国生物防御界发挥着核心作用,其独特的使命促使NBACC自成立以来一直将双重用途研究(DURC)审查作为重点。2007年开始对外发布研究成果之前的审查,2011年开始对所有考虑DURC的项目进行机构级审查。NBACC的DURC审查过程经过了四种方法的演变,每种方法都有优点和缺点,这些方法都与最近发布的美国政府生命科学双重用途研究机构监督政策相一致。目前的NBACC审查过程强调主要研究者(PI)的所有权和责任,在DURC审查中建立透明度,并专门为NBACC量身定制,以加强责任的机构文化。本文总结了NBACC对DURC有效审查的演变过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信