Relationship between sporting discipline and aortic dimensions in middle-aged sportsmen

M. Hol, Vincent L. Aengevaeren, A. Mosterd, T. Eijsvogels, B. Velthuis
{"title":"Relationship between sporting discipline and aortic dimensions in middle-aged sportsmen","authors":"M. Hol, Vincent L. Aengevaeren, A. Mosterd, T. Eijsvogels, B. Velthuis","doi":"10.1093/EHJCI/JEAA356.223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: None.\n Background\n A previous study reported a high prevalence (21%) of clinically relevant aortic dilatation (≥40 mm) in competitive veteran runners and rowers. It is uncertain whether this also applies to middle-aged sportsmen performing other sporting disciplines.\n Purpose\n To relate aortic dimensions to sporting disciplines in middle-aged sportsmen.\n Methods\n Middle-aged sportsmen, ≥45 years of age, underwent coronary CT angiography. Aortic size was measured at the sinus of Valsalva (cusp-cusp) and the ascending aorta (at the height of the pulmonary trunk). Dominant sporting discipline was categorized as running, cycling or other. Analysis of variance was used to compare baseline characteristics and aortic dimensions across sporting disciplines. Multivariable linear regression was used to adjust for baseline characteristics. \n Results\n A total of 260 sportsmen (mean age 55.1 ± 6.4 years; 64 runners, 75 cyclists and 121 other sporting disciplines) were included (Table). Clinically relevant aortic dilatation was found in 5.0% (n = 13). Aortic size or presence of aortic dilatation did not differ across sporting disciplines. Ascending aorta and aortic root size were significantly related to age, body surface area, diastolic blood pressure and exercise tolerance, but not sporting disciplines.\n Conclusions\n We found clinically relevant aortic dilatation in 5% of middle-aged sportsmen. Aortic size was not different between sporting disciplines. Aortic size may be more related to level of exercise performance rather than sporting discipline.\n Running (n = 64) Cycling (n = 75) Other (n = 121) p value Participant characteristics Age, yrs 54.6 ± 6.4 56.1 ± 6.8 54.8 ± 6.2 0.30 Systolic BP, mmHg 129 ± 12 128 ± 13 129 ± 12 0.95 Diastolic BP, mmHg 80 ± 8 79 ± 8 80 ± 9 0.32 Body surface area, m2 2.03 ± 0.14 2.02 ± 0.15 2.07 ± 0.15 0.08 Exercise tolerance, Watt 310 ± 42* 329 ± 47 307 ± 48 0.003 Aortic dimensions Ascending aorta maximum diameter, mm 32.5 ± 3.1 33.0 ± 3.8 32.5 ± 3.6 0.64 SoV mean diameter, mm 34.3 ± 2.8 34.1 ± 2.8 33.7 ± 3.2 0.46 SoV, NCC-RCC diameter, mm 34.2 ± 2.9 34.0 ± 2.9 33.7 ± 3.4 0.61 Any aortic diameter ≥40 mm, n (%) 3 (4.7) 2 (2.7) 8 (6.6) 0.46 Values are mean SD or n (%). *significantly different from cycling and other. BP = blood pressure; SoV = sinus of Valsalva; NCC = non-coronary cusp; RCC = right coronary cusp\n","PeriodicalId":11963,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Echocardiography","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/EHJCI/JEAA356.223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type of funding sources: None. Background A previous study reported a high prevalence (21%) of clinically relevant aortic dilatation (≥40 mm) in competitive veteran runners and rowers. It is uncertain whether this also applies to middle-aged sportsmen performing other sporting disciplines. Purpose To relate aortic dimensions to sporting disciplines in middle-aged sportsmen. Methods Middle-aged sportsmen, ≥45 years of age, underwent coronary CT angiography. Aortic size was measured at the sinus of Valsalva (cusp-cusp) and the ascending aorta (at the height of the pulmonary trunk). Dominant sporting discipline was categorized as running, cycling or other. Analysis of variance was used to compare baseline characteristics and aortic dimensions across sporting disciplines. Multivariable linear regression was used to adjust for baseline characteristics.  Results A total of 260 sportsmen (mean age 55.1 ± 6.4 years; 64 runners, 75 cyclists and 121 other sporting disciplines) were included (Table). Clinically relevant aortic dilatation was found in 5.0% (n = 13). Aortic size or presence of aortic dilatation did not differ across sporting disciplines. Ascending aorta and aortic root size were significantly related to age, body surface area, diastolic blood pressure and exercise tolerance, but not sporting disciplines. Conclusions We found clinically relevant aortic dilatation in 5% of middle-aged sportsmen. Aortic size was not different between sporting disciplines. Aortic size may be more related to level of exercise performance rather than sporting discipline. Running (n = 64) Cycling (n = 75) Other (n = 121) p value Participant characteristics Age, yrs 54.6 ± 6.4 56.1 ± 6.8 54.8 ± 6.2 0.30 Systolic BP, mmHg 129 ± 12 128 ± 13 129 ± 12 0.95 Diastolic BP, mmHg 80 ± 8 79 ± 8 80 ± 9 0.32 Body surface area, m2 2.03 ± 0.14 2.02 ± 0.15 2.07 ± 0.15 0.08 Exercise tolerance, Watt 310 ± 42* 329 ± 47 307 ± 48 0.003 Aortic dimensions Ascending aorta maximum diameter, mm 32.5 ± 3.1 33.0 ± 3.8 32.5 ± 3.6 0.64 SoV mean diameter, mm 34.3 ± 2.8 34.1 ± 2.8 33.7 ± 3.2 0.46 SoV, NCC-RCC diameter, mm 34.2 ± 2.9 34.0 ± 2.9 33.7 ± 3.4 0.61 Any aortic diameter ≥40 mm, n (%) 3 (4.7) 2 (2.7) 8 (6.6) 0.46 Values are mean SD or n (%). *significantly different from cycling and other. BP = blood pressure; SoV = sinus of Valsalva; NCC = non-coronary cusp; RCC = right coronary cusp
中年运动员运动规律与主动脉尺寸的关系
资金来源类型:无。先前的一项研究报道,在竞技资深运动员和赛艇运动员中,临床上相关的主动脉扩张(≥40 mm)的患病率很高(21%)。目前还不确定这是否也适用于从事其他体育项目的中年运动员。目的探讨中年运动员主动脉尺寸与运动学科的关系。方法对年龄≥45岁的中年运动员行冠状动脉CT血管造影。在Valsalva鼻窦(尖尖)和升主动脉(肺动脉干高度)处测量主动脉大小。主要的运动项目被归类为跑步、骑自行车或其他。方差分析用于比较不同运动学科的基线特征和主动脉尺寸。采用多变量线性回归对基线特征进行调整。结果共260名运动员,平均年龄55.1±6.4岁;包括64名赛跑运动员、75名单车运动员及121名其他运动项目(表)。有临床意义的主动脉扩张占5.0% (n = 13)。主动脉大小或主动脉扩张的存在在不同运动学科之间没有差异。升主动脉和主动脉根大小与年龄、体表面积、舒张压和运动耐量相关,与运动学科无关。结论:我们发现5%的中年运动员有临床上相关的主动脉扩张。不同运动项目的主动脉大小没有差异。主动脉的大小可能更多地与运动表现水平有关,而不是与运动纪律有关。跑步(n = 64)骑自行车(n = 75)其他(n = 121) p值参与者年龄特点,年54.6±6.4 - 56.1±6.8 54.8±6.2 - 0.30收缩压,12毫米汞柱129±128±13 129±12 0.95舒张压,79毫米汞柱80±8±8 80±0.32身体表面积,m2 2.03±0.14 - 2.02±0.15 2.07±0.15 - 0.08运动耐量,瓦特310±42 * 329±0.003 47 307±48主动脉维升主动脉最大直径,32.5毫米32.5±3.1 - 33.0±3.8±3.6 - 0.64平均直径,mm 34.3±2.8 34.1±2.8 33.7±3.2 0.46 SoV, nc - rcc直径,mm 34.2±2.9 34.0±2.9 33.7±3.4 0.61任何主动脉直径≥40 mm, n(%) 3(4.7) 2(2.7) 8(6.6) 0.46值为平均SD或n(%)。*明显不同于骑自行车和其他。BP =血压;SoV = Valsalva窦;NCC =非冠状动脉尖;右冠状动脉尖
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Echocardiography
European Journal of Echocardiography 医学-心血管系统
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书