Analysis of Rectal Neoplasms Operated After Neoadjuvant Therapy in A Period of 10 Years

H. F. L. Junior, Luiz Henrique Minatti, João Oliveira, M. Gerber, Flávia Cristina de Novaes Gerber, D. Vieira, José Mauro dos Santos
{"title":"Analysis of Rectal Neoplasms Operated After Neoadjuvant Therapy in A Period of 10 Years","authors":"H. F. L. Junior, Luiz Henrique Minatti, João Oliveira, M. Gerber, Flávia Cristina de Novaes Gerber, D. Vieira, José Mauro dos Santos","doi":"10.30476/ACRR.2020.87993.1063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: With the advances of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the identification of complete tumor responses, and the reduction of local recurrence even with the adoption of expectant approaches aimed at sphincter preservation, several authors have published results analyzing these aspects with conflicting results, which require further investigation. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the anatomopathological changes in surgical specimens of rectal resection due to adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, including the complete response rate, in addition to estimating the sensitivity and specificity indexes of the imaging methods used in the preoperative period. Methods: This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study in which 44 medical records of patients with cancer of the middle and lower rectum who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and subsequently underwent oncological surgical resections over 10 years were studied. Demographic data, CT scans, colonoscopies, anatomopathological reports and surgical reports were analyzed. Results: Abdominoperineal resection of the rectum (APR) was performed in 16 cases (36.4%), and abdominal rectosigmoidectomy (AR) was performed in 28 cases (63.6%). Preoperative computerized tomography (CT) showed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 77.8% for the detection of lymph node metastases. The complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was found in 11.36% of cases. The local recurrence was detected in 23.9% cases and distant metastasis in 15.2% of the patients on the follow-up period, additionally, there was a 77.7% 5-years disease-free survival and the overall survival was 73.9%. Conclusions: The rate of complete pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy was 11.36%. Locally advanced disease and angiolymphatic embolization were associated with a higher frequency of lymph node involvement. CT obtained high rates of sensitivity and specificity for comparison with anatomopathological results.","PeriodicalId":8370,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Colorectal Research","volume":"58 1","pages":"141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Colorectal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/ACRR.2020.87993.1063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the advances of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the identification of complete tumor responses, and the reduction of local recurrence even with the adoption of expectant approaches aimed at sphincter preservation, several authors have published results analyzing these aspects with conflicting results, which require further investigation. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the anatomopathological changes in surgical specimens of rectal resection due to adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, including the complete response rate, in addition to estimating the sensitivity and specificity indexes of the imaging methods used in the preoperative period. Methods: This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study in which 44 medical records of patients with cancer of the middle and lower rectum who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and subsequently underwent oncological surgical resections over 10 years were studied. Demographic data, CT scans, colonoscopies, anatomopathological reports and surgical reports were analyzed. Results: Abdominoperineal resection of the rectum (APR) was performed in 16 cases (36.4%), and abdominal rectosigmoidectomy (AR) was performed in 28 cases (63.6%). Preoperative computerized tomography (CT) showed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 77.8% for the detection of lymph node metastases. The complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was found in 11.36% of cases. The local recurrence was detected in 23.9% cases and distant metastasis in 15.2% of the patients on the follow-up period, additionally, there was a 77.7% 5-years disease-free survival and the overall survival was 73.9%. Conclusions: The rate of complete pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy was 11.36%. Locally advanced disease and angiolymphatic embolization were associated with a higher frequency of lymph node involvement. CT obtained high rates of sensitivity and specificity for comparison with anatomopathological results.
直肠肿瘤新辅助治疗10年分析
背景:随着新辅助放化疗的进展,肿瘤完全反应的识别,以及局部复发的减少,即使采用旨在保留括约肌的预期入路,一些作者发表的结果分析了这些方面,结果相互矛盾,需要进一步研究。目的:本研究旨在评估接受新辅助治疗的直肠腺癌切除手术标本的解剖病理变化,包括完全缓解率,以及术前所用影像学方法的敏感性和特异性指标。方法:这是一项观察性、回顾性、横断面研究,对44例接受新辅助放化疗并随后接受肿瘤手术切除的中、下直肠癌症患者的病历进行了10年的研究。统计资料、CT扫描、结肠镜检查、解剖病理报告和手术报告进行分析。结果:行腹会阴直肠切除术(APR) 16例(36.4%),腹乙状结肠切除术(AR) 28例(63.6%)。术前CT检查淋巴结转移的敏感性为75%,特异性为77.8%。11.36%的病例对新辅助放化疗有完全的病理反应。随访期间局部复发23.9%,远处转移15.2%,5年无病生存率77.7%,总生存率73.9%。结论:新辅助治疗的病理完全缓解率为11.36%。局部晚期疾病和血管淋巴栓塞与淋巴结受累的频率较高相关。与解剖病理结果相比,CT具有较高的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信