Collusion in Technical Development: A Perspective on EC’s Emission Cleaning Judgement

Bidyadhar Majhi, Sakshi Goel
{"title":"Collusion in Technical Development: A Perspective on EC’s Emission Cleaning Judgement","authors":"Bidyadhar Majhi, Sakshi Goel","doi":"10.54425/ccijoclp.v3.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In July 2021, the European Commission (EC) came out with a decision in a matter involving the issue of collusion in technical development with reference to emission cleaning for new diesel passenger cars. The said decision is the first of its kind, wherein the EC ruled that meeting of minds amongst competitors placed at a horizontal level with a view to limit technical development and competition on innovation in the area of emission cleaning technologies for passenger cars amounts to cartelisation, leading to the imposition of penalty on the five colluding parties. Taking clues from the above ruling of EC, this paper, by using doctrinal research methods, establishes a parallel between technology lock-in, network externalities, and collusion in technical development so far as their anti-competitive outcomes are concerned and provides that, in both technological lock-in and technical collusion, markets fail to produce efficient/competitive outcome. The paper supplements existing literature by advocating prompt regulatory intervention in both situations to correct market aberrations. Even though the ruling under reference relates to emission cleaning technologies for passenger cars, similar conduct may be present in other sectors. Accordingly, the paper suggests prompt regulatory action by competition authorities to ensure effective competition in the technology and innovation fields and for the benefit of society as a whole through the availability of innovative products at competitive prices and favourable impact on the environment.","PeriodicalId":68002,"journal":{"name":"竞争法律与政策评论","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"竞争法律与政策评论","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54425/ccijoclp.v3.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In July 2021, the European Commission (EC) came out with a decision in a matter involving the issue of collusion in technical development with reference to emission cleaning for new diesel passenger cars. The said decision is the first of its kind, wherein the EC ruled that meeting of minds amongst competitors placed at a horizontal level with a view to limit technical development and competition on innovation in the area of emission cleaning technologies for passenger cars amounts to cartelisation, leading to the imposition of penalty on the five colluding parties. Taking clues from the above ruling of EC, this paper, by using doctrinal research methods, establishes a parallel between technology lock-in, network externalities, and collusion in technical development so far as their anti-competitive outcomes are concerned and provides that, in both technological lock-in and technical collusion, markets fail to produce efficient/competitive outcome. The paper supplements existing literature by advocating prompt regulatory intervention in both situations to correct market aberrations. Even though the ruling under reference relates to emission cleaning technologies for passenger cars, similar conduct may be present in other sectors. Accordingly, the paper suggests prompt regulatory action by competition authorities to ensure effective competition in the technology and innovation fields and for the benefit of society as a whole through the availability of innovative products at competitive prices and favourable impact on the environment.
技术发展中的共谋:以欧共体排放净化判断为视角
2021年7月,欧盟委员会(EC)就涉及新型柴油乘用车排放清洁的技术开发串通问题做出了决定。上述决定是欧盟首次作出此类决定,欧盟委员会裁定,竞争对手之间在水平水平上达成共识,以限制乘用车排放清洁技术领域的技术发展和创新竞争,构成卡特尔化,并对五家串通的当事人处以罚款。本文以上述欧共体裁决为线索,运用理论研究方法,建立了技术锁定、网络外部性和技术发展中的合谋在反竞争结果方面的平行关系,并指出在技术锁定和技术合谋中,市场都不能产生有效/竞争的结果。本文补充了现有文献,主张在这两种情况下迅速进行监管干预,以纠正市场失常。尽管上述裁决涉及乘用车排放清洁技术,但其他行业也可能存在类似的行为。因此,本文建议竞争主管部门迅速采取管制行动,以确保技术和创新领域的有效竞争,并通过以具有竞争力的价格提供创新产品和对环境产生有利影响,为整个社会谋福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书