Using paired teaching for earthquake education in schools

IF 1.9 Q2 Social Sciences
S. Mohadjer, S. Mutz, M. Kemp, Sophie J. Gill, A. Ischuk, T. Ehlers
{"title":"Using paired teaching for earthquake education in schools","authors":"S. Mohadjer, S. Mutz, M. Kemp, Sophie J. Gill, A. Ischuk, T. Ehlers","doi":"10.5194/gc-2020-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In this study, we have created 10 geoscience video lessons that follow the\npaired-teaching pedagogical approach. This method is used to supplement the\nstandard school curriculum with video lessons, instructed by geoscientists\nfrom around the world, coupled with activities carried out under the guidance\nof classroom teachers. The video lessons introduce students to the\nscientific concepts behind earthquakes (e.g. the Earth's interior, plate\ntectonics, faulting, and seismic energy), earthquake hazards, and mitigation\nmeasures (e.g. liquefaction, structural, and non-structural earthquake\nhazards). These concepts are taught through hands-on learning, where students\nuse everyday materials to build models to visualize basic Earth processes\nthat produce earthquakes and explore the effects of different hazards. To\nevaluate the effectiveness of these virtual lessons, we tested our videos\nin school classrooms in Dushanbe (Tajikistan) and London (United Kingdom).\nBefore and after the video implementations, students completed questionnaires\nthat probed their knowledge on topics covered by each video, including the\nEarth's interior, tectonic plate boundaries, and non-structural hazards. Our assessment results indicate that, while the paired-teaching video lessons\nappear to enhance student knowledge and understanding of some concepts\n(e.g. Earth's interior, earthquake location forecasting, and non-structural\nhazards), they bring little change to their views on the causes of earthquakes\nand their relation to plate boundaries. In general, the difference between\nUK and Tajik students' level of knowledge prior to and after video testing\nis more significant than the difference between pre- and post-knowledge for\neach group. This could be due to several factors affecting curriculum\ntesting (e.g. level of teachers' participation and classroom culture) and\nstudents' learning of content (e.g. pre-existing hazards knowledge and\nexperience). To maximize the impact of school-based risk\nreduction education, curriculum developers must move beyond innovative\ncontent and pedagogical approaches, take classroom culture into\nconsideration, and instil skills needed for participatory learning and\ndiscovery.\n","PeriodicalId":52877,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Communication","volume":"15 1","pages":"281-295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2020-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract. In this study, we have created 10 geoscience video lessons that follow the paired-teaching pedagogical approach. This method is used to supplement the standard school curriculum with video lessons, instructed by geoscientists from around the world, coupled with activities carried out under the guidance of classroom teachers. The video lessons introduce students to the scientific concepts behind earthquakes (e.g. the Earth's interior, plate tectonics, faulting, and seismic energy), earthquake hazards, and mitigation measures (e.g. liquefaction, structural, and non-structural earthquake hazards). These concepts are taught through hands-on learning, where students use everyday materials to build models to visualize basic Earth processes that produce earthquakes and explore the effects of different hazards. To evaluate the effectiveness of these virtual lessons, we tested our videos in school classrooms in Dushanbe (Tajikistan) and London (United Kingdom). Before and after the video implementations, students completed questionnaires that probed their knowledge on topics covered by each video, including the Earth's interior, tectonic plate boundaries, and non-structural hazards. Our assessment results indicate that, while the paired-teaching video lessons appear to enhance student knowledge and understanding of some concepts (e.g. Earth's interior, earthquake location forecasting, and non-structural hazards), they bring little change to their views on the causes of earthquakes and their relation to plate boundaries. In general, the difference between UK and Tajik students' level of knowledge prior to and after video testing is more significant than the difference between pre- and post-knowledge for each group. This could be due to several factors affecting curriculum testing (e.g. level of teachers' participation and classroom culture) and students' learning of content (e.g. pre-existing hazards knowledge and experience). To maximize the impact of school-based risk reduction education, curriculum developers must move beyond innovative content and pedagogical approaches, take classroom culture into consideration, and instil skills needed for participatory learning and discovery.
运用配对教学进行学校地震教育
摘要在这项研究中,我们创建了10个地球科学视频课程,遵循配对教学方法。这种方法是用来补充标准学校课程的视频课程,由来自世界各地的地球科学家指导,再加上在课堂老师的指导下进行的活动。这些视频课程向学生介绍地震背后的科学概念(例如地球内部、板块构造、断层和地震能量)、地震危害和减灾措施(例如液化、结构性和非结构性地震危害)。这些概念是通过实践学习来教授的,学生们使用日常材料来建立模型,以可视化产生地震的基本地球过程,并探索不同灾害的影响。为了评估这些虚拟课程的有效性,我们在杜尚别(塔吉克斯坦)和伦敦(英国)的学校教室中测试了我们的视频。在视频实施之前和之后,学生们完成了调查问卷,调查了他们对每个视频所涵盖主题的了解,包括地球内部、构造板块边界和非结构性危害。我们的评估结果表明,虽然配对教学视频课程似乎增强了学生对某些概念的知识和理解(例如:地球内部、地震位置预测和非结构性灾害),他们对地震原因及其与板块边界关系的看法几乎没有改变。总的来说,英国和塔吉克学生在视频测试前后的知识水平差异比两组学生在知识测试前后的差异更显著。这可能是由于影响课程测试的几个因素(例如,教师的参与水平和课堂文化)和学生对内容的学习(例如,预先存在的危害知识和经验)。为了最大限度地发挥以学校为基础的降低风险教育的影响,课程开发人员必须超越创新的内容和教学方法,考虑课堂文化,并灌输参与式学习和发现所需的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书