‘Weed-ing’ Out Disproportionate Regulation: The Free Movement of CBD in the European Union Following the Kanavape Judgment

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Bogdan-Florin Nae
{"title":"‘Weed-ing’ Out Disproportionate Regulation: The Free Movement of CBD in the European Union Following the Kanavape Judgment","authors":"Bogdan-Florin Nae","doi":"10.54648/leie2021033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As cannabidiol’s (CBD) popularity has been increasing, multiple questions to as to its legal regime, including under European Union (EU) law, have been raised. In its preliminary ruling in the Kanavape case, the European Court of Justice, for the first time, clarifies that CBD falls under the free movement of goods provisions in primary EU law (Articles 34 and 36 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)). This case note critically addresses the Court’s reasonsing, while putting the case in its broader legal and policy context.\nArticle 34 TFEU, Article 36 TFEU, cannabidiol (CBD), narcotic drugs, negative integration, UN drug conventions, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2021033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As cannabidiol’s (CBD) popularity has been increasing, multiple questions to as to its legal regime, including under European Union (EU) law, have been raised. In its preliminary ruling in the Kanavape case, the European Court of Justice, for the first time, clarifies that CBD falls under the free movement of goods provisions in primary EU law (Articles 34 and 36 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)). This case note critically addresses the Court’s reasonsing, while putting the case in its broader legal and policy context. Article 34 TFEU, Article 36 TFEU, cannabidiol (CBD), narcotic drugs, negative integration, UN drug conventions, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
“铲除”不成比例的监管:卡纳瓦普判决后欧盟CBD的自由流动
随着大麻二酚(CBD)越来越受欢迎,有关其法律制度(包括欧盟法律)的多个问题也被提出。在卡纳瓦普案的初步裁决中,欧洲法院首次澄清,《生物多样性公约》属于欧盟主要法律(《欧盟运作条约》(TFEU)第34条和第36条)中货物自由流动的规定。本案件说明批判性地论述了法院的推理,同时将案件置于更广泛的法律和政策背景中。第34条TFEU,第36条TFEU,大麻二酚(CBD),麻醉药品,负面一体化,联合国毒品公约,维也纳条约法公约
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信