Sustainable Workplaces as Innovation

Nancy C. Jurik, Gray Cavender
{"title":"Sustainable Workplaces as Innovation","authors":"Nancy C. Jurik, Gray Cavender","doi":"10.9774/gleaf.3709.2016.ja.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionACADEMIC RESEARCH AND POPULAR NEWS sources alike decry what has come to be called the \"toxic workplace\" (Chamberlain & Hodson, 2010; Williams, 2011; Morgan, 2013; Schwartz, 2014). As an environment, the toxic workplace includes an array of harmful working conditions ranging from hostile co-workers and insensitive bosses to chaotic and exploitative work environments. Awareness of the toxic workplace has become more pronounced since the great recession of 2008. As businesses downsized, there have been myriad reports that surviving employees are forced to work harder to offset the diminished worker population, and subjected to debilitating working conditions (Greenhouse, 2015, p. BU1; Sanger-Katz, 2015; Miller, 2015, p. A3). Worse, workers are trapped in bad jobs by a weak labor market.Yet, amid bad news on the labor front, here and there pockets of hopeful news have emerged. Some management scholars and a host of local and international social movement organizations are calling for action to promote more sustainable workplaces (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2007; Pfeffer, 2010; Spreitzer & Porath, 2012). They argue for conceptualizing sustainable workplaces in ways that go beyond eco-friendly environments to positive, regenerative environments for employees. Sustainable workplaces are viewed as an innovation, not so much of new products or new production processes, but as a change that entails decent treatment of employees (Ehnert & Harry, 2012).In this paper, we present an analysis of 60 interviews of small business owners that employed 1-100 employees. These firms were identified by local chambers of commerce, business organizations and business magazines as innovative businesses. Innovations included product, service and process types (Jurik, McGhee, & Bivona, 2010). In the course of interviews, we asked owners how they created innovative businesses. Over three-fourths of the 60 businesses credited the work environment that they had created for themselves and their employees. Upon a review of our findings and the growing body of literature on toxicity and its counterpart, sustainable work environments, we found that our sample of small businesses offered important insights into managerial strategies for building non-toxic work environments in small businesses. Some literature argues that sustainable work environments promote high employee work performance. Our data link such environments to business innovation.In the sections below, we discuss the literature on toxic and sustainable work environments followed by a discussion of our methodology and sample. We then present our analysis of owner narratives about the work environment. We found that 77% of owners stressed the importance of strategies in one or some combination of the following three realms: job dimensions, organizational level dynamics, and interpersonal interactions.Toxic vs. sustainable work environments: the literatureThe global recession that began in 2008 heightened the sense of insecurity, stress, and exhaustion that workers experience, and older terms such as burnout or rustout have reappeared in the literature (Docherty et al., 2007). Amid unemployment at rates not seen in decades, downsizing (even globally) is the \"new normal,\" and workers have been stretched to and beyond capacity. Yet, workers are afraid to complain about, much less leave, a bad job because there are so few jobs. The situation is so dire that research decries that \"Taylorism lives\" (Kira, 2002; Crowley et al., 2010; Witzel & Warner, 2015), and there are increasingly allusions to the \"toxic workplace\" (Chamberlain & Hudson 2010).Recent years have been a time of much bad news in the workplace. The academic literature is replete with research about incivility and rudeness, even outright bullying in the workplace (Hutton, 2006; Tracy et al., 2006; Johnson & Indvik, 2001). U.S. businesses seem to be so obsessed with short-term financial gain that there is little concern about job insecurity, ill-health due to job-related stress, or any sense of work-life balance for workers. …","PeriodicalId":90357,"journal":{"name":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","volume":"18 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.3709.2016.ja.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

IntroductionACADEMIC RESEARCH AND POPULAR NEWS sources alike decry what has come to be called the "toxic workplace" (Chamberlain & Hodson, 2010; Williams, 2011; Morgan, 2013; Schwartz, 2014). As an environment, the toxic workplace includes an array of harmful working conditions ranging from hostile co-workers and insensitive bosses to chaotic and exploitative work environments. Awareness of the toxic workplace has become more pronounced since the great recession of 2008. As businesses downsized, there have been myriad reports that surviving employees are forced to work harder to offset the diminished worker population, and subjected to debilitating working conditions (Greenhouse, 2015, p. BU1; Sanger-Katz, 2015; Miller, 2015, p. A3). Worse, workers are trapped in bad jobs by a weak labor market.Yet, amid bad news on the labor front, here and there pockets of hopeful news have emerged. Some management scholars and a host of local and international social movement organizations are calling for action to promote more sustainable workplaces (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2007; Pfeffer, 2010; Spreitzer & Porath, 2012). They argue for conceptualizing sustainable workplaces in ways that go beyond eco-friendly environments to positive, regenerative environments for employees. Sustainable workplaces are viewed as an innovation, not so much of new products or new production processes, but as a change that entails decent treatment of employees (Ehnert & Harry, 2012).In this paper, we present an analysis of 60 interviews of small business owners that employed 1-100 employees. These firms were identified by local chambers of commerce, business organizations and business magazines as innovative businesses. Innovations included product, service and process types (Jurik, McGhee, & Bivona, 2010). In the course of interviews, we asked owners how they created innovative businesses. Over three-fourths of the 60 businesses credited the work environment that they had created for themselves and their employees. Upon a review of our findings and the growing body of literature on toxicity and its counterpart, sustainable work environments, we found that our sample of small businesses offered important insights into managerial strategies for building non-toxic work environments in small businesses. Some literature argues that sustainable work environments promote high employee work performance. Our data link such environments to business innovation.In the sections below, we discuss the literature on toxic and sustainable work environments followed by a discussion of our methodology and sample. We then present our analysis of owner narratives about the work environment. We found that 77% of owners stressed the importance of strategies in one or some combination of the following three realms: job dimensions, organizational level dynamics, and interpersonal interactions.Toxic vs. sustainable work environments: the literatureThe global recession that began in 2008 heightened the sense of insecurity, stress, and exhaustion that workers experience, and older terms such as burnout or rustout have reappeared in the literature (Docherty et al., 2007). Amid unemployment at rates not seen in decades, downsizing (even globally) is the "new normal," and workers have been stretched to and beyond capacity. Yet, workers are afraid to complain about, much less leave, a bad job because there are so few jobs. The situation is so dire that research decries that "Taylorism lives" (Kira, 2002; Crowley et al., 2010; Witzel & Warner, 2015), and there are increasingly allusions to the "toxic workplace" (Chamberlain & Hudson 2010).Recent years have been a time of much bad news in the workplace. The academic literature is replete with research about incivility and rudeness, even outright bullying in the workplace (Hutton, 2006; Tracy et al., 2006; Johnson & Indvik, 2001). U.S. businesses seem to be so obsessed with short-term financial gain that there is little concern about job insecurity, ill-health due to job-related stress, or any sense of work-life balance for workers. …
作为创新的可持续工作场所
学术研究和流行新闻来源都谴责所谓的“有毒工作场所”(Chamberlain & Hodson, 2010;威廉姆斯,2011;摩根,2013;施瓦兹,2014)。作为一个环境,有毒的工作场所包括一系列有害的工作条件,从敌对的同事和麻木不仁的老板到混乱和剥削的工作环境。自2008年经济大衰退以来,对有毒工作场所的意识变得更加明显。随着企业规模的缩小,有无数的报道称,幸存的员工被迫更加努力地工作,以抵消减少的工人人口,并遭受使人衰弱的工作条件(温室,2015年,p. BU1;Sanger-Katz, 2015;Miller, 2015, p. A3)。更糟糕的是,由于劳动力市场疲软,工人们被困在糟糕的工作岗位上。然而,在劳工方面的坏消息中,到处都出现了一些有希望的消息。一些管理学者和许多本地和国际社会运动组织正在呼吁采取行动,促进更可持续的工作场所(普华永道,2007;菲,2010;Spreitzer & Porath, 2012)。他们主张将可持续的工作场所概念化,超越生态友好的环境,为员工创造积极的、可再生的环境。可持续工作场所被视为一种创新,而不是新产品或新生产流程,而是一种需要体面对待员工的变革(Ehnert & Harry, 2012)。在本文中,我们对雇用1-100名员工的小企业主进行了60次访谈分析。这些公司被当地商会、商业组织和商业杂志认定为创新企业。创新包括产品、服务和流程类型(Jurik, McGhee, & Bivona, 2010)。在采访过程中,我们询问了企业主他们是如何创建创新型企业的。在60家企业中,超过四分之三的企业对他们为自己和员工创造的工作环境表示赞赏。在回顾了我们的研究结果和越来越多的关于毒性及其对应的可持续工作环境的文献之后,我们发现,我们的小企业样本为在小企业中建立无毒工作环境的管理策略提供了重要的见解。一些文献认为,可持续的工作环境促进了员工的高工作绩效。我们的数据将这样的环境与商业创新联系起来。在下面的章节中,我们将讨论关于有毒和可持续工作环境的文献,然后讨论我们的方法和样本。然后,我们展示了我们对业主关于工作环境的叙述的分析。我们发现,77%的企业所有者在以下三个领域(工作维度、组织层级动态和人际互动)的一个或多个方面强调战略的重要性。2008年开始的全球经济衰退加剧了员工的不安全感、压力和疲惫感,而倦怠或生锈等老术语又在文献中重新出现(Docherty et al., 2007)。在几十年来未见的失业率中,裁员(甚至在全球范围内)是“新常态”,工人们已经超负荷工作。然而,由于工作机会太少,工人们不敢抱怨,更不敢离开一份糟糕的工作。这种情况是如此可怕,以至于研究人员谴责“泰勒主义仍然存在”(Kira, 2002;Crowley et al., 2010;Witzel & Warner, 2015),并且越来越多地提到“有毒的工作场所”(Chamberlain & Hudson, 2010)。近年来,职场坏消息层出不穷。学术文献中充满了关于不礼貌和粗鲁的研究,甚至是工作场所的直接欺凌(Hutton, 2006;Tracy et al., 2006;Johnson & Indvik, 2001)。美国企业似乎如此痴迷于短期的经济利益,以至于很少关心工作的不安全感、因工作压力而导致的健康问题,也很少关心员工的工作与生活平衡。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信