American Indian Landowners, Leasemen, and Bureaucrats: Property, Paper, and the Poli-Technics of Dispossession in Southwestern Oklahoma

T. VanWinkle, J. Friedman
{"title":"American Indian Landowners, Leasemen, and Bureaucrats: Property, Paper, and the Poli-Technics of Dispossession in Southwestern Oklahoma","authors":"T. VanWinkle, J. Friedman","doi":"10.5250/AMERINDIQUAR.42.4.0508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Drawing from a combination of archival and ethnographic evidence, this article examines historic and contemporary land tenure issues within a single county in southwestern Oklahoma. Specifically, we look at the way in which bureaucratic control has created a system that, while originally and ostensible intended to protect the “rights” of American Indian landowners, in fact functions to restrict, undermine, and redirect “access” to those lands, often to the economic benefit of non-Indian farmers and ranchers. We consider how the leasing system administered by the Anadarko Agency of the Bureau of Indian Affairs generates a “bundle of powers” that creates profound barriers to American Indian access to their own property. At work in the BIA’s bundle of powers over access to this land are a host of actors and institutions, both contemporary and historic, that have worked together to shape the social relations that give rise to the current alienation from and dispossession of Oklahoma’s Native-owned lands from their intended beneficiaries. Indeed, this tenuous situation is reflective of complexities attending continual retrenchments and revisions of federal Indian land policy—periodic reassertions of bureaucratic authority and control that reposition actors in perennially shifting sociolegal relationalities. We seek if not to disentangle these relationships, then to at least render them visible and thus open to debate and intervention.","PeriodicalId":22216,"journal":{"name":"The American Indian Quarterly","volume":"21 1","pages":"508 - 533"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Indian Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5250/AMERINDIQUAR.42.4.0508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Drawing from a combination of archival and ethnographic evidence, this article examines historic and contemporary land tenure issues within a single county in southwestern Oklahoma. Specifically, we look at the way in which bureaucratic control has created a system that, while originally and ostensible intended to protect the “rights” of American Indian landowners, in fact functions to restrict, undermine, and redirect “access” to those lands, often to the economic benefit of non-Indian farmers and ranchers. We consider how the leasing system administered by the Anadarko Agency of the Bureau of Indian Affairs generates a “bundle of powers” that creates profound barriers to American Indian access to their own property. At work in the BIA’s bundle of powers over access to this land are a host of actors and institutions, both contemporary and historic, that have worked together to shape the social relations that give rise to the current alienation from and dispossession of Oklahoma’s Native-owned lands from their intended beneficiaries. Indeed, this tenuous situation is reflective of complexities attending continual retrenchments and revisions of federal Indian land policy—periodic reassertions of bureaucratic authority and control that reposition actors in perennially shifting sociolegal relationalities. We seek if not to disentangle these relationships, then to at least render them visible and thus open to debate and intervention.
美国印第安土地所有者、租赁人和官僚:俄克拉何马州西南部的财产、文件和剥夺的政治技术
摘要:本文结合档案和民族志证据,考察了俄克拉荷马州西南部一个县的历史和当代土地权属问题。具体来说,我们将研究官僚控制如何创造了一种制度,虽然最初和表面上是为了保护美洲印第安人土地所有者的“权利”,但实际上却限制、破坏和改变了对这些土地的“访问”,通常是为了非印第安农民和牧场主的经济利益。我们将考虑由印第安事务局阿纳达科局管理的租赁制度是如何产生一种“权力捆绑”的,它对美国印第安人获得自己的财产造成了深刻的障碍。在BIA获得这片土地的权力中,有许多当代和历史上的演员和机构在工作,他们共同努力塑造了社会关系,这些关系导致了当前俄克拉何马州土著拥有的土地从他们的预期受益者那里被异化和剥夺。事实上,这种脆弱的情况反映了印度联邦土地政策的持续紧缩和修订所带来的复杂性——官僚权威和控制的周期性重申,使行动者在不断变化的社会法律关系中重新定位。我们寻求的是,如果不解开这些关系,那么至少让它们变得可见,从而开放辩论和干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信