REGULATION OF REPRODUCTIVE CLONING AND INHERITABLE GENETIC MODIFICATIONS ON HUMANS - PERILS AND DEFICIENCIES

Anđela Đukanović
{"title":"REGULATION OF REPRODUCTIVE CLONING AND INHERITABLE GENETIC MODIFICATIONS ON HUMANS - PERILS AND DEFICIENCIES","authors":"Anđela Đukanović","doi":"10.47152/rkkp.59.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Harms arising from reproductive cloning or inheritable genetic modifications, for the time being, seem significant. This is supported by the simple fact that the first cloned monkeys were short-lived or by the fact that inheritable genetic modifications still carry a high chance of getting “off-target” results, which could result in serious health problems. Inheritable genetic modifications, in particular, have a high therapeutic potential, and it is suggested that this technology’s comprehension is shifting from an absolute ban, to concerns over safety issues. International law can prove to be facilitative when it comes to deciding which new technology should be prohibited, restricted or allowed, having in mind possible consequences and the so-called phenomenon of reproductive tourism. Legally binding regulation of both technologies has proven challenging at the universal level. However, there has been some progress in Europe on that matter. Harms arising from inheritable genetic modifications seem even higher than in the case of reproductive cloning, since they have the potential to affect the whole of humanity, including future generations. The Criminal Code of Serbia and the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia prohibit reproductive cloning. However, the prohibition of inheritable genetic modifications on humans is not regulated explicitly in the Criminal Code of Serbia, making this technology seem more acceptable or less harmful.","PeriodicalId":85724,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.59.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Harms arising from reproductive cloning or inheritable genetic modifications, for the time being, seem significant. This is supported by the simple fact that the first cloned monkeys were short-lived or by the fact that inheritable genetic modifications still carry a high chance of getting “off-target” results, which could result in serious health problems. Inheritable genetic modifications, in particular, have a high therapeutic potential, and it is suggested that this technology’s comprehension is shifting from an absolute ban, to concerns over safety issues. International law can prove to be facilitative when it comes to deciding which new technology should be prohibited, restricted or allowed, having in mind possible consequences and the so-called phenomenon of reproductive tourism. Legally binding regulation of both technologies has proven challenging at the universal level. However, there has been some progress in Europe on that matter. Harms arising from inheritable genetic modifications seem even higher than in the case of reproductive cloning, since they have the potential to affect the whole of humanity, including future generations. The Criminal Code of Serbia and the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia prohibit reproductive cloning. However, the prohibition of inheritable genetic modifications on humans is not regulated explicitly in the Criminal Code of Serbia, making this technology seem more acceptable or less harmful.
对人类生殖性克隆和可遗传基因修改的管制。危险和缺陷
从目前来看,生殖性克隆或可遗传的基因修改所造成的危害似乎是重大的。支持这一观点的简单事实是,第一批克隆猴子寿命很短,或者是可遗传的基因修改仍然很有可能产生“脱靶”结果,这可能导致严重的健康问题。尤其是可遗传的基因修饰,具有很高的治疗潜力,有人认为,对这项技术的理解正在从绝对禁止转变为对安全问题的担忧。考虑到可能的后果和所谓的生殖旅游现象,在决定应禁止、限制或允许哪些新技术时,国际法可以证明是有利的。事实证明,在全球范围内对这两种技术进行具有法律约束力的监管具有挑战性。然而,欧洲在这个问题上已经取得了一些进展。遗传基因改变所造成的危害似乎比生殖性克隆所造成的危害还要大,因为它们有可能影响全人类,包括子孙后代。《塞尔维亚刑法》和《塞尔维亚共和国宪法》禁止生殖性克隆。然而,塞尔维亚的《刑法》没有明确规定禁止对人类进行遗传修饰,这使得这项技术似乎更容易被接受或危害更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信