Integrating Science Gateways with Secure Cloud Computing Resources: An Examination of Two Deployment Patterns and Their Requirements

Q4 Social Sciences
M. Pierce, S. Marru
{"title":"Integrating Science Gateways with Secure Cloud Computing Resources: An Examination of Two Deployment Patterns and Their Requirements","authors":"M. Pierce, S. Marru","doi":"10.1109/HUSTProtools51951.2020.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines scenarios in which science gateways can facilitate access to cloud computing resources to support scientific research using regulated or protected data stored on clouds. Specifically, we discuss the use of science gateways to access Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), a US regulatory standard that covers a broad range of US federal government-owned or regulated data, and that also provides a useful proxy for other types of sensitive data, such as private sector intellectual property. We focus on the impact of CUI requirements on science gateway platforms that can be used to create and manage science gateway instances. Gateway platforms are centrally operated by gateway platform providers who create and control gateway instances on behalf of gateway providers. Broadly, platforms operate following either a multi-tenant or else a multi-instance pattern. Multi-tenanted science gateway platforms are designed to support multiple science gateways simultaneously, with each gateway as a tenant to a single operational instance of the platform middleware. Multi-instance platforms, on the other hand, provide and manage an entire instance of the science gateway software for each gateway. This paper reviews these two scenarios from the perspective of the Science Gateways Platform as a service (SciGaP), a multitenanted gateway platform based on the open-source Apache Airavata software. We examine requirements for providing multitenanted platforms for CUI gateways and also the requirements for providing the same software as a multi-instance platform. In both cases, we assume the use of CUI-compatible resources from commercial cloud providers. Both approaches are technically feasible but have trade-offs that must be considered.","PeriodicalId":38836,"journal":{"name":"Meta: Avaliacao","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meta: Avaliacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HUSTProtools51951.2020.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper examines scenarios in which science gateways can facilitate access to cloud computing resources to support scientific research using regulated or protected data stored on clouds. Specifically, we discuss the use of science gateways to access Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), a US regulatory standard that covers a broad range of US federal government-owned or regulated data, and that also provides a useful proxy for other types of sensitive data, such as private sector intellectual property. We focus on the impact of CUI requirements on science gateway platforms that can be used to create and manage science gateway instances. Gateway platforms are centrally operated by gateway platform providers who create and control gateway instances on behalf of gateway providers. Broadly, platforms operate following either a multi-tenant or else a multi-instance pattern. Multi-tenanted science gateway platforms are designed to support multiple science gateways simultaneously, with each gateway as a tenant to a single operational instance of the platform middleware. Multi-instance platforms, on the other hand, provide and manage an entire instance of the science gateway software for each gateway. This paper reviews these two scenarios from the perspective of the Science Gateways Platform as a service (SciGaP), a multitenanted gateway platform based on the open-source Apache Airavata software. We examine requirements for providing multitenanted platforms for CUI gateways and also the requirements for providing the same software as a multi-instance platform. In both cases, we assume the use of CUI-compatible resources from commercial cloud providers. Both approaches are technically feasible but have trade-offs that must be considered.
集成科学网关与安全云计算资源:两种部署模式及其需求分析
本文研究了科学网关可以促进访问云计算资源的场景,以便使用存储在云上的受监管或受保护的数据来支持科学研究。具体来说,我们讨论了科学网关访问受控非机密信息(CUI)的使用,这是一项美国监管标准,涵盖了广泛的美国联邦政府拥有或监管的数据,并且还为其他类型的敏感数据(如私营部门知识产权)提供了有用的代理。我们将重点关注CUI需求对科学网关平台的影响,这些平台可用于创建和管理科学网关实例。网关平台由网关平台提供商集中操作,网关平台提供商代表网关提供商创建和控制网关实例。一般来说,平台要么遵循多租户模式,要么遵循多实例模式。多租户科学网关平台旨在同时支持多个科学网关,每个网关作为平台中间件的单个操作实例的租户。另一方面,多实例平台为每个网关提供和管理科学网关软件的完整实例。本文从基于开源Apache Airavata软件的多租户网关平台科学网关平台即服务(sciigap)的角度对这两种场景进行了回顾。我们研究了为CUI网关提供多租户平台的需求,以及为多实例平台提供相同软件的需求。在这两种情况下,我们都假设使用来自商业云提供商的gui兼容资源。这两种方法在技术上都是可行的,但必须考虑折衷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Meta: Avaliacao
Meta: Avaliacao Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信