Use of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in a patient with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A case report

J. Haynes
{"title":"Use of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in a patient with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A case report","authors":"J. Haynes","doi":"10.29390/cjrt-2021-017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia may necessitate intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Early in the course of mechanical ventilation neuromuscular blocking agents may be used to allow synchronous lung protective ventilation. However, patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia tend to have an intense respiratory drive resulting in patient–ventilator asynchrony when neuromuscular blocking agents are discontinued. Case and Outcomes A 75-year-old male was admitted to the hospital with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. By ventilator day 5 the neuromuscular blocking agent had been discontinued, and the patient was markedly asynchronous in the volume control mode despite receiving continuous intravenous sedatives. The ventilator mode was changed to the neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) mode. Initially NAVA resulted in improved synchrony and reduced work of breathing. However, a few days later the patient’s tidal volume had fallen to <300 mL on NAVA despite increases in the NAVA level. It appeared that the inspiratory phase was prematurely terminating, and the expiratory threshold in NAVA is not adjustable. The ventilator mode was changed to pressure support resulting in an increased tidal volume and reduced respiratory frequency. Conclusion In patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and intense respiratory drive, the performance of NAVA may be variable. NAVA may result in hypopnea and tachypnea when compared with pressure support. An assessment of the impact of an adjustable expiratory threshold in NAVA is warranted.","PeriodicalId":9533,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2021-017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia may necessitate intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Early in the course of mechanical ventilation neuromuscular blocking agents may be used to allow synchronous lung protective ventilation. However, patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia tend to have an intense respiratory drive resulting in patient–ventilator asynchrony when neuromuscular blocking agents are discontinued. Case and Outcomes A 75-year-old male was admitted to the hospital with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. By ventilator day 5 the neuromuscular blocking agent had been discontinued, and the patient was markedly asynchronous in the volume control mode despite receiving continuous intravenous sedatives. The ventilator mode was changed to the neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) mode. Initially NAVA resulted in improved synchrony and reduced work of breathing. However, a few days later the patient’s tidal volume had fallen to <300 mL on NAVA despite increases in the NAVA level. It appeared that the inspiratory phase was prematurely terminating, and the expiratory threshold in NAVA is not adjustable. The ventilator mode was changed to pressure support resulting in an increased tidal volume and reduced respiratory frequency. Conclusion In patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and intense respiratory drive, the performance of NAVA may be variable. NAVA may result in hypopnea and tachypnea when compared with pressure support. An assessment of the impact of an adjustable expiratory threshold in NAVA is warranted.
神经调节通气辅助(NAVA)在重症SARS-CoV-2肺炎患者中的应用:1例报告
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)肺炎可能需要插管和长时间机械通气。在机械通气过程的早期,可以使用神经肌肉阻滞剂来实现同步肺保护性通气。然而,当停止使用神经肌肉阻滞剂时,SARS-CoV-2肺炎患者往往具有强烈的呼吸驱动,导致患者-呼吸机不同步。病例和结果一名75岁男性因SARS-CoV-2肺炎入院,需要有创机械通气。到呼吸机第5天,神经肌肉阻滞剂已停用,尽管患者接受了持续静脉注射镇静剂,但在容量控制模式下仍明显不同步。将呼吸机模式改为神经调节通气辅助(NAVA)模式。最初,NAVA改善了同步性,减少了呼吸的工作量。然而,几天后,尽管NAVA水平升高,但患者的潮气量已降至<300 mL。可见吸气期过早终止,呼吸阈不可调节。呼吸机模式改为压力支持,导致潮气量增加,呼吸频率降低。结论在SARS-CoV-2肺炎和强烈的呼吸驱动患者中,NAVA的表现可能存在差异。与压力支持相比,NAVA可能导致呼吸不足和呼吸急促。评估可调节的呼气阈值对NAVA的影响是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信