Scaling social innovation: Ownership, documentation, infrastructuring elements and rehearsing new practices

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Artifact Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1386/art_00022_1
S. Yndigegn, Eva Brandt, Maria Foverskov, Lone Malmborg
{"title":"Scaling social innovation: Ownership, documentation, infrastructuring elements and rehearsing new practices","authors":"S. Yndigegn, Eva Brandt, Maria Foverskov, Lone Malmborg","doi":"10.1386/art_00022_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, co-designing for social innovation is explored in many western democracies to transform political agendas and develop sustainable societies. For social innovation to have a radical and wide-reaching impact on society, scaling is crucial. Scaling social innovation after ending a project requires a focus on making innovations sustainable in the long run and how they can foster organizational or institutional transformation. Despite increased interest in design for social innovation and scaling, little attention has been given to how the scaling of social innovation unfolds in practice over a longer period. A qualitative study was conducted following the continuation of a social innovation project called SeniorInteraction, which ended in 2012. Through interviews and field visits, we examined the attempts at scaling by different public and private partners and citizens after the project ended. The social innovation concept in question is an open exercise community in public parks for senior citizens supported by the local municipality. The research provides a deeper understanding of scaling in practice and identifies four important drivers for scaling social innovation: ownership, documentation, infrastructuring elements and rehearsing new practices. Additionally, we discuss challenges related to the way we understand and evaluate the scaling of social innovations.","PeriodicalId":36630,"journal":{"name":"Artifact","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artifact","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/art_00022_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, co-designing for social innovation is explored in many western democracies to transform political agendas and develop sustainable societies. For social innovation to have a radical and wide-reaching impact on society, scaling is crucial. Scaling social innovation after ending a project requires a focus on making innovations sustainable in the long run and how they can foster organizational or institutional transformation. Despite increased interest in design for social innovation and scaling, little attention has been given to how the scaling of social innovation unfolds in practice over a longer period. A qualitative study was conducted following the continuation of a social innovation project called SeniorInteraction, which ended in 2012. Through interviews and field visits, we examined the attempts at scaling by different public and private partners and citizens after the project ended. The social innovation concept in question is an open exercise community in public parks for senior citizens supported by the local municipality. The research provides a deeper understanding of scaling in practice and identifies four important drivers for scaling social innovation: ownership, documentation, infrastructuring elements and rehearsing new practices. Additionally, we discuss challenges related to the way we understand and evaluate the scaling of social innovations.
扩展社会创新:所有权、文档、基础设施元素和排练新的实践
今天,许多西方民主国家正在探索社会创新的共同设计,以改变政治议程和发展可持续社会。要使社会创新对社会产生根本性和广泛的影响,规模至关重要。在项目结束后扩大社会创新需要关注创新的长期可持续性,以及它们如何促进组织或制度转型。尽管人们对社会创新和规模设计的兴趣越来越大,但很少有人关注社会创新的规模如何在更长的一段时间内在实践中展开。一项定性研究是在2012年结束的名为“老年人互动”的社会创新项目继续进行之后进行的。通过访谈和实地考察,我们考察了项目结束后不同的公私合作伙伴和市民对规模的尝试。该社会创新概念是由地方自治团体支持的在公园里为老年人开放的运动社区。该研究对实践中的规模化提供了更深入的理解,并确定了规模化社会创新的四个重要驱动因素:所有权、文档、基础设施要素和排练新实践。此外,我们还讨论了与我们理解和评估社会创新规模的方式相关的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artifact
Artifact Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信