Extended Graded Modalities in Strategy Logic

Hkhmt m`Sr Pub Date : 2016-07-10 DOI:10.4204/EPTCS.218.1
Benjamin Aminof, Vadim Malvone, A. Murano, S. Rubin
{"title":"Extended Graded Modalities in Strategy Logic","authors":"Benjamin Aminof, Vadim Malvone, A. Murano, S. Rubin","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.218.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strategy Logic (SL) is a logical formalism for strategic reasoning in multi-agent systems. Its main feature is that it has variables for strategies that are associated to specific agents with a binding operator. We introduce Graded Strategy Logic (GRADEDSL), an extension of SL by graded quantifiers over tuples of strategy variables, i.e., “there exist at least g different tuples (x1;:::; xn) of strategies” where g is a cardinal from the set N[f?0;?1; 2 ?0g. We prove that the model-checking problem of GRADEDSL is decidable. We then turn to the complexity of fragments of GRADEDSL. When the g’s are restricted to finite cardinals, written GRADEDNSL, the complexity of model-checking is no harder than for SL, i.e., it is non-elementary in the quantifier rank. We illustrate our formalism by showing how to count the number of different strategy profiles that are Nash equilibria (NE), or subgame-perfect equilibria (SPE). By analyzing the structure of the specific formulas involved, we conclude that the important problems of checking for the existence of a unique NE or SPE can both be solved in 2EXPTIME, which is not harder than merely checking for the existence of such equilibria.","PeriodicalId":53035,"journal":{"name":"Hkhmt m`Sr","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hkhmt m`Sr","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.218.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Strategy Logic (SL) is a logical formalism for strategic reasoning in multi-agent systems. Its main feature is that it has variables for strategies that are associated to specific agents with a binding operator. We introduce Graded Strategy Logic (GRADEDSL), an extension of SL by graded quantifiers over tuples of strategy variables, i.e., “there exist at least g different tuples (x1;:::; xn) of strategies” where g is a cardinal from the set N[f?0;?1; 2 ?0g. We prove that the model-checking problem of GRADEDSL is decidable. We then turn to the complexity of fragments of GRADEDSL. When the g’s are restricted to finite cardinals, written GRADEDNSL, the complexity of model-checking is no harder than for SL, i.e., it is non-elementary in the quantifier rank. We illustrate our formalism by showing how to count the number of different strategy profiles that are Nash equilibria (NE), or subgame-perfect equilibria (SPE). By analyzing the structure of the specific formulas involved, we conclude that the important problems of checking for the existence of a unique NE or SPE can both be solved in 2EXPTIME, which is not harder than merely checking for the existence of such equilibria.
策略逻辑中的扩展分级模式
策略逻辑(SL)是多智能体系统中策略推理的逻辑形式。它的主要特点是它具有用于策略的变量,这些策略与带有绑定操作符的特定代理相关联。我们引入了分级策略逻辑(GRADEDSL),这是通过分级量词在策略变量元组上对SL的扩展,即“存在至少g个不同的元组(x1;:::;xn),其中g是集合N[f?0;?1;2 ? 0 g。证明了GRADEDSL的模型检验问题是可判定的。然后我们转向GRADEDSL片段的复杂性。当g被限制为有限基数时,写为GRADEDNSL,模型检查的复杂性并不比SL更难,也就是说,它在量词等级中是非初等的。我们通过展示如何计算纳什均衡(NE)或子博弈完美均衡(SPE)的不同策略概况的数量来说明我们的形式主义。通过分析所涉及的特定公式的结构,我们得出结论,检查是否存在唯一的NE或SPE的重要问题都可以在2EXPTIME内解决,这并不比仅仅检查这种平衡的存在性更难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信