Support for Neoliberal Conservation Strategies in State Park and Recreation Service Delivery: Privatization, Trust, and Place Attachment

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Nicholas A. D. Pitas, A. Mowen
{"title":"Support for Neoliberal Conservation Strategies in State Park and Recreation Service Delivery: Privatization, Trust, and Place Attachment","authors":"Nicholas A. D. Pitas, A. Mowen","doi":"10.1080/08941920.2023.2199698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While state park visitation has increased significantly in recent decades, tax-based funding has been inconsistent. As such, neoliberal conservation practices including various forms of privatization have received increased attention as potential strategies to fund state park and recreation service delivery. Though several factors influence public attitudes toward privatization, research suggests that trust influences perceptions of alternative funding strategies, and that contextual factors related to place attachment may also play an intermediary role. As such, we assessed the role of agency trust as a determinant of support for privatization and the potential role of place attachment as a mediator in this relationship. Our results indicate greater trust is generally related to support for privatization in the state park and recreation service delivery, and that place dependence partially mediated this relationship. Managers and policy-makers may wish to prioritize building organizational trust and functional attachment, particularly when considering the implementation of privatization practices.","PeriodicalId":48223,"journal":{"name":"Society & Natural Resources","volume":"11 1","pages":"1163 - 1180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2199698","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract While state park visitation has increased significantly in recent decades, tax-based funding has been inconsistent. As such, neoliberal conservation practices including various forms of privatization have received increased attention as potential strategies to fund state park and recreation service delivery. Though several factors influence public attitudes toward privatization, research suggests that trust influences perceptions of alternative funding strategies, and that contextual factors related to place attachment may also play an intermediary role. As such, we assessed the role of agency trust as a determinant of support for privatization and the potential role of place attachment as a mediator in this relationship. Our results indicate greater trust is generally related to support for privatization in the state park and recreation service delivery, and that place dependence partially mediated this relationship. Managers and policy-makers may wish to prioritize building organizational trust and functional attachment, particularly when considering the implementation of privatization practices.
支持州立公园和娱乐服务提供中的新自由主义保护策略:私有化、信任和地方依恋
摘要近几十年来,州立公园的游客数量显著增加,但税收资助却不一致。因此,新自由主义的保护实践,包括各种形式的私有化,作为资助州立公园和娱乐服务提供的潜在战略,受到了越来越多的关注。虽然有几个因素影响公众对私有化的态度,但研究表明,信任影响对替代融资策略的看法,并且与地点依恋相关的背景因素也可能发挥中介作用。因此,我们评估了代理信任作为私有化支持的决定因素的作用,以及地方依恋在这种关系中作为中介的潜在作用。我们的研究结果表明,更高的信任通常与支持州立公园私有化和娱乐服务提供有关,并且地方依赖部分地中介了这种关系。管理人员和决策者可能希望优先建立组织信任和职能依恋,特别是在考虑实施私有化做法时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Society and Natural Resources publishes cutting edge social science research that advances understanding of the interaction between society and natural resources.Social science research is extensive and comes from a number of disciplines, including sociology, psychology, political science, communications, planning, education, and anthropology. We welcome research from all of these disciplines and interdisciplinary social science research that transcends the boundaries of any single social science discipline. We define natural resources broadly to include water, air, wildlife, fisheries, forests, natural lands, urban ecosystems, and intensively managed lands. While we welcome all papers that fit within this broad scope, we especially welcome papers in the following four important and broad areas in the field: 1. Protected area management and governance 2. Stakeholder analysis, consultation and engagement; deliberation processes; governance; conflict resolution; social learning; social impact assessment 3. Theoretical frameworks, epistemological issues, and methodological perspectives 4. Multiscalar character of social implications of natural resource management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信