The Last Shall Be Last: The Order of Precedence among Clergy in Late Antiquity

Q3 Arts and Humanities
R. Wiśniewski
{"title":"The Last Shall Be Last: The Order of Precedence among Clergy in Late Antiquity","authors":"R. Wiśniewski","doi":"10.1484/j.se.5.119459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the order of precedence among the holders of the same clerical rank in the late antique church. This order, based on seniority, was most probably displayed in the public sphere, but even more importantly, it affected the income and promotion of clerics. The article also studies specific cases in which the seniority was ignored or broken. It argues that while lay people often supported swifter promotion of outstanding individuals and bishops were inclined to act accordingly, the middle and lower clergy strongly opposed nominations which violated the established horizontal hierarchy.","PeriodicalId":39610,"journal":{"name":"Sacris Erudiri","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sacris Erudiri","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1484/j.se.5.119459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the order of precedence among the holders of the same clerical rank in the late antique church. This order, based on seniority, was most probably displayed in the public sphere, but even more importantly, it affected the income and promotion of clerics. The article also studies specific cases in which the seniority was ignored or broken. It argues that while lay people often supported swifter promotion of outstanding individuals and bishops were inclined to act accordingly, the middle and lower clergy strongly opposed nominations which violated the established horizontal hierarchy.
最后的应该是最后的:古代晚期神职人员的优先顺序
这篇文章讨论了在古代晚期教会中具有相同神职人员等级的人之间的优先次序。这种以资历为基础的秩序,很可能是在公共领域表现出来的,但更重要的是,它影响了神职人员的收入和晋升。本文还研究了忽视或破坏年资的具体案例。它认为,虽然俗人通常支持迅速提拔杰出人士,主教也倾向于采取相应行动,但中下层神职人员强烈反对违反既定水平等级制度的提名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sacris Erudiri
Sacris Erudiri Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Sacris Erudiri is an international journal of religious sciences in its broadest sense. Studies published refer mainly to the history of the Church, the history of liturgy and patristics. Whilst excluding nothing, the topics addressed refer more to factual and institutional history than to doctrinal history. These articles often represent preliminary analyses for later critical editions of patristic and medieval texts to be published in various series of the Corpus Christianorum. Articles are published in English, French, German, Italian and Spanish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信