Comparative toxicity of allelochemicals and their enzymatic oxidation products to maize fungal pathogens, emphasizing Fusarium graminearum.

Natural toxins Pub Date : 1998-12-07 DOI:10.1002/19970505NT2
P. Dowd, J. Duvick, T. Rood
{"title":"Comparative toxicity of allelochemicals and their enzymatic oxidation products to maize fungal pathogens, emphasizing Fusarium graminearum.","authors":"P. Dowd, J. Duvick, T. Rood","doi":"10.1002/19970505NT2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A series of stable quinones and their precursors, and enzymatic oxidation products of plant allelochemicals were tested for their effect on maize fungal pathogens, primarily Fusarium graminearum. Benzoquinone was typically significantly more toxic than hydroquinone, while 1,2-naphthoquinone was typically significantly more toxic than 1,2-dihydroxynaphthalene. Aspergillus flavus was the most resistant fungus to these compounds, while Phoma medicaginis was the most susceptible. Applying tyrosinase in conjunction with several phenolic compounds only increased the toxicity of gallic acid to Fusarium graminearum. Applying peroxidase generally increased toxicity of all compounds tested to this fungus in a dose-dependent fashion. Ferulic acid was generally the most toxic compound, both alone and when combined with peroxidase and H2O2, followed by coumaric acid. These results suggest that enzymatic oxidation of plant allelochemicals may result in the generation of products that either are directly toxic to maize pathogens, or indirectly inhibitory due to their ability to tie up nutrients.","PeriodicalId":18777,"journal":{"name":"Natural toxins","volume":"18 1","pages":"180-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural toxins","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/19970505NT2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

A series of stable quinones and their precursors, and enzymatic oxidation products of plant allelochemicals were tested for their effect on maize fungal pathogens, primarily Fusarium graminearum. Benzoquinone was typically significantly more toxic than hydroquinone, while 1,2-naphthoquinone was typically significantly more toxic than 1,2-dihydroxynaphthalene. Aspergillus flavus was the most resistant fungus to these compounds, while Phoma medicaginis was the most susceptible. Applying tyrosinase in conjunction with several phenolic compounds only increased the toxicity of gallic acid to Fusarium graminearum. Applying peroxidase generally increased toxicity of all compounds tested to this fungus in a dose-dependent fashion. Ferulic acid was generally the most toxic compound, both alone and when combined with peroxidase and H2O2, followed by coumaric acid. These results suggest that enzymatic oxidation of plant allelochemicals may result in the generation of products that either are directly toxic to maize pathogens, or indirectly inhibitory due to their ability to tie up nutrients.
化感化学物质及其酶氧化产物对玉米真菌病原菌的毒性比较,重点是禾谷镰刀菌。
研究了一系列稳定的醌类及其前体和植物化感物质的酶促氧化产物对玉米真菌病原菌(主要是禾谷镰刀菌)的作用。苯醌的毒性明显高于对苯二酚,而1,2-萘醌的毒性明显高于1,2-二羟基萘。黄曲霉对这些化合物的抗性最强,而药霉最敏感。酪氨酸酶与几种酚类化合物联用只会增加没食子酸对禾谷镰刀菌的毒性。施用过氧化物酶通常会增加所有化合物对该真菌的毒性,并呈剂量依赖性。阿魏酸通常是毒性最大的化合物,无论是单独使用还是与过氧化物酶和H2O2联合使用,其次是香豆酸。这些结果表明,植物化感化学物质的酶氧化可能导致产物的产生,这些产物要么对玉米病原体直接有毒,要么由于它们束缚营养物质的能力而间接抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信