Estimation of secondary cancer projected risk after partial breast irradiation at the 1.5 T MR-linac.

Journal of clinical child psychology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-12 DOI:10.1007/s00066-022-01930-5
C De-Colle, O Dohm, D Mönnich, M Nachbar, N Weidner, V Heinrich, S Boeke, C Gani, D Zips, D Thorwarth
{"title":"Estimation of secondary cancer projected risk after partial breast irradiation at the 1.5 T MR-linac.","authors":"C De-Colle, O Dohm, D Mönnich, M Nachbar, N Weidner, V Heinrich, S Boeke, C Gani, D Zips, D Thorwarth","doi":"10.1007/s00066-022-01930-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For patients treated with partial breast irradiation (PBI), potential long-term treatment-related toxicities are important. The 1.5 T magnetic resonance guided linear accelerator (MRL) offers excellent tumor bed visualization and a daily treatment plan adaption possibility, but MRL-specific electron stream and return effects may cause increased dose deposition at air-tissue interfaces. In this study, we aimed to investigate the projected risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancies (RISM) in patients treated with PBI at the 1.5 T MRL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Projected excess absolute risk values (EARs) for the contralateral breast, lungs, thyroid and esophagus were estimated for 11 patients treated with PBI at the MRL and compared to 11 patients treated with PBI and 11 patients treated with whole breast irradiation (WBI) at the conventional linac (CTL). All patients received 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions. For patients treated at the CTL, additional dose due to daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was simulated. The t‑test with Bonferroni correction was used for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest projected risk for a radiation-induced secondary cancer was found for the ipsilateral lung, without significant differences between the groups. A lower contralateral breast EAR was found for MRL-PBI (EAR = 0.89) compared to CTL-PBI (EAR = 1.41, p = 0.01), whereas a lower thyroid EAR for CTL-PBI (EAR = 0.17) compared to MRL-PBI (EAR = 0.33, p = 0.03) and CTL-WBI (EAR = 0.46, p = 0.002) was observed. Nevertheless, when adding the CBCT dose no difference between thyroid EAR for CTL-PBI compared to MRL-PBI was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Better breast tissue visualization and the possibility for daily plan adaption make PBI at the 1.5 T MRL particularly attractive. Our simulations suggest that this treatment can be performed without additional projected risk of RISM.</p>","PeriodicalId":79502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical child psychology","volume":"8 1 1","pages":"622-629"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical child psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-01930-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: For patients treated with partial breast irradiation (PBI), potential long-term treatment-related toxicities are important. The 1.5 T magnetic resonance guided linear accelerator (MRL) offers excellent tumor bed visualization and a daily treatment plan adaption possibility, but MRL-specific electron stream and return effects may cause increased dose deposition at air-tissue interfaces. In this study, we aimed to investigate the projected risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancies (RISM) in patients treated with PBI at the 1.5 T MRL.

Methods: Projected excess absolute risk values (EARs) for the contralateral breast, lungs, thyroid and esophagus were estimated for 11 patients treated with PBI at the MRL and compared to 11 patients treated with PBI and 11 patients treated with whole breast irradiation (WBI) at the conventional linac (CTL). All patients received 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions. For patients treated at the CTL, additional dose due to daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was simulated. The t‑test with Bonferroni correction was used for comparison.

Results: The highest projected risk for a radiation-induced secondary cancer was found for the ipsilateral lung, without significant differences between the groups. A lower contralateral breast EAR was found for MRL-PBI (EAR = 0.89) compared to CTL-PBI (EAR = 1.41, p = 0.01), whereas a lower thyroid EAR for CTL-PBI (EAR = 0.17) compared to MRL-PBI (EAR = 0.33, p = 0.03) and CTL-WBI (EAR = 0.46, p = 0.002) was observed. Nevertheless, when adding the CBCT dose no difference between thyroid EAR for CTL-PBI compared to MRL-PBI was detected.

Conclusion: Better breast tissue visualization and the possibility for daily plan adaption make PBI at the 1.5 T MRL particularly attractive. Our simulations suggest that this treatment can be performed without additional projected risk of RISM.

估算 1.5 T MR-linac 部分乳腺照射后的继发性癌症预测风险。
目的对于接受乳腺部分照射(PBI)治疗的患者而言,潜在的长期治疗相关毒性非常重要。1.5 T 磁共振引导直线加速器(MRL)具有良好的肿瘤床可视性和日常治疗计划调整的可能性,但 MRL 特有的电子流和回流效应可能会导致空气-组织界面的剂量沉积增加。在这项研究中,我们旨在调查在1.5 T MRL上接受PBI治疗的患者发生辐射诱导的继发性恶性肿瘤(RISM)的预计风险:我们估算了11名在MRL接受PBI治疗的患者对侧乳腺、肺、甲状腺和食道的预计超额绝对风险值(EARs),并与11名接受PBI治疗的患者和11名在传统线阵(CTL)接受全乳腺照射(WBI)的患者进行了比较。所有患者均接受了 15 次、每次 40.05 Gy 的照射。对于在 CTL 治疗的患者,模拟了每日锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)造成的额外剂量。比较结果采用了带有邦费罗尼校正的 t 检验:结果:同侧肺部的辐射诱发继发性癌症的预计风险最高,组间无显著差异。与CTL-PBI(EAR = 1.41,P = 0.01)相比,MRL-PBI(EAR = 0.89)的对侧乳腺EAR较低;与MRL-PBI(EAR = 0.33,P = 0.03)和CTL-WBI(EAR = 0.46,P = 0.002)相比,CTL-PBI(EAR = 0.17)的甲状腺EAR较低。然而,当增加 CBCT 剂量时,CTL-PBI 的甲状腺 EAR 与 MRL-PBI 相比没有发现差异:结论:更好的乳腺组织可视化和每日计划调整的可能性使 1.5 T MRL 的 PBI 尤为吸引人。我们的模拟结果表明,进行这种治疗不会增加预计的 RISM 风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信