Cross‐sector alliances in the global refugee crisis: An institutional theory approach

IF 4.8 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
A. Yang, Wenlin Liu, Rong Wang
{"title":"Cross‐sector alliances in the global refugee crisis: An institutional theory approach","authors":"A. Yang, Wenlin Liu, Rong Wang","doi":"10.1111/beer.12288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the United Nations Refugee Agency (2017), there are over 40 million refugees worldwide. Although the refugee crisis in Europe captivated international attention in 2015, the crisis has evolved to become a global problem. Refugees currently living in Europe only account for 17% of the global refugee population, and the situation is much direr in regions such as Africa (30%), Middle East, and North Africa (26%). For millions of refugees, their forced displacement journeys may be fatal. Between 2015 and 2017, the annual refugee fatality rate kept reaching records (Missing Migrant Project, 2018). In 2016 alone, over 8,000 refugees died from drowning and vehicle accidents during migration. Even when refugees reach resettlement camps, many still struggle with access to basic living resources and face challenges such as language barriers, poverty, and cross-cultural adaptation (Douglas, Levitan, & Kiama, 2017). The scope and magnitude of the global refugee crisis are unprecedented. This crisis has posed severe challenges to social stability and sustainable development around the world. Yet, most governments are ill-prepared for this global humanitarian crisis, or their actions are mired by polarized domestic public opinions and nationalist movements. Cross-sector alliance is an effective way for societies to address wicked problems such as the global refugee crisis that spills over sectoral and national boundaries (Jamali, Yianni, & Abdallah, 2011; Selsky & Parker, 2005). These types of interorganizational relationships are also known as multi-stakeholder collaboratives, social alliances, cause-based partnerships, social service partnerships, and business-community partnerships (for an extensive review, see Koschmann, Kuhn, & Pfarrer, 2012). While many NGOs and intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) advocate on behalf of refugees, our initial assessment reveals considerable disparity when it comes to corporate participation in refugee relief efforts and their corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. Received: 10 October 2018 | Revised: 5 April 2020 | Accepted: 16 April 2020 DOI: 10.1111/beer.12288","PeriodicalId":47954,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics-A European Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"646-660"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics-A European Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

According to the United Nations Refugee Agency (2017), there are over 40 million refugees worldwide. Although the refugee crisis in Europe captivated international attention in 2015, the crisis has evolved to become a global problem. Refugees currently living in Europe only account for 17% of the global refugee population, and the situation is much direr in regions such as Africa (30%), Middle East, and North Africa (26%). For millions of refugees, their forced displacement journeys may be fatal. Between 2015 and 2017, the annual refugee fatality rate kept reaching records (Missing Migrant Project, 2018). In 2016 alone, over 8,000 refugees died from drowning and vehicle accidents during migration. Even when refugees reach resettlement camps, many still struggle with access to basic living resources and face challenges such as language barriers, poverty, and cross-cultural adaptation (Douglas, Levitan, & Kiama, 2017). The scope and magnitude of the global refugee crisis are unprecedented. This crisis has posed severe challenges to social stability and sustainable development around the world. Yet, most governments are ill-prepared for this global humanitarian crisis, or their actions are mired by polarized domestic public opinions and nationalist movements. Cross-sector alliance is an effective way for societies to address wicked problems such as the global refugee crisis that spills over sectoral and national boundaries (Jamali, Yianni, & Abdallah, 2011; Selsky & Parker, 2005). These types of interorganizational relationships are also known as multi-stakeholder collaboratives, social alliances, cause-based partnerships, social service partnerships, and business-community partnerships (for an extensive review, see Koschmann, Kuhn, & Pfarrer, 2012). While many NGOs and intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) advocate on behalf of refugees, our initial assessment reveals considerable disparity when it comes to corporate participation in refugee relief efforts and their corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. Received: 10 October 2018 | Revised: 5 April 2020 | Accepted: 16 April 2020 DOI: 10.1111/beer.12288
全球难民危机中的跨部门联盟:一种制度理论方法
根据联合国难民署(2017年)的数据,全球有4000多万难民。尽管欧洲的难民危机在2015年引起了国际关注,但这场危机已经演变成一个全球性问题。目前生活在欧洲的难民仅占全球难民人口的17%,而非洲(30%)、中东和北非(26%)等地区的情况更为严峻。对数百万难民来说,他们被迫流离失所的旅程可能是致命的。(《失踪移民项目》,2018年)。仅在2016年,就有8000多名难民在移民过程中死于溺水和车祸。即使难民到达重新安置营地,许多人仍然难以获得基本的生活资源,并面临语言障碍、贫困和跨文化适应等挑战(Douglas, Levitan, & Kiama, 2017)。全球难民危机的范围和严重程度是前所未有的。这场危机给世界社会稳定和可持续发展带来了严峻挑战。然而,大多数政府对这场全球人道主义危机准备不足,或者他们的行动受到国内两极分化的民意和民族主义运动的困扰。跨部门联盟是社会解决诸如跨越部门和国家边界的全球难民危机等恶劣问题的有效途径(Jamali, Yianni, & Abdallah, 2011;Selsky & Parker, 2005)。这些类型的组织间关系也被称为多利益相关者合作、社会联盟、基于事业的伙伴关系、社会服务伙伴关系和商业-社区伙伴关系(有关广泛的回顾,请参阅Koschmann, Kuhn, & Pfarrer, 2012)。虽然许多非政府组织和政府间组织(igo)为难民发声,但我们的初步评估显示,在企业参与难民救济工作和企业社会责任(CSR)倡议方面,存在相当大的差距。收稿日期:2018年10月10日|修稿日期:2020年4月5日|收稿日期:2020年4月16日DOI: 10.1111/beer.12288
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: -To offer rigorous and informed analysis of ethical issues and perspectives relevant to organizations and their relationships with society -To promote scholarly research and advance knowledge in relation to business ethics and corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship by providing cutting edge theoretical and empirical analysis of salient issues and developments -To be responsive to changing concerns and emerging issues in the business ethics and business and society sphere, and to seek to reflect these in the balance of contributions -To be the publication outlet of choice for all types of original research relating to business ethics and business-society relationships. Original articles are welcomed. Each issue will normally contain several major articles, and there will be an occasional FOCUS section which will contain articles on an issue of particular importance and topicality. Other regular features will include editorial interviews, book reviews, comments and responses to published articles, research notes and case studies. Business Ethics: A European Review is well established as an academic research journal which is at the same time readable, user-friendly and authoritative. It publishes both fully refereed scholarly papers and special contributions such as speeches and reviews. The range of contributions reflects the variety and scope of ethical issues faced by business and other organisations world-wide, and at the same time seeks to address the interests and concerns of the journals readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信