Direct, non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin for stroke with atrial fibrillation and cerebral small vessel disease

Lipeng Cai, Honglian Duan, Sara Saymuah, Ruiqiang Xin, Xiaokun Geng, Yuchuan Ding
{"title":"Direct, non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin for stroke with atrial fibrillation and cerebral small vessel disease","authors":"Lipeng Cai, Honglian Duan, Sara Saymuah, Ruiqiang Xin, Xiaokun Geng, Yuchuan Ding","doi":"10.4103/ed.ed_9_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is not only associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients on oral anticoagulation, but also associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Limited data support the benefits of direct, non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and CSVD. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DOACs in AIS or TIA with AF and CSVD. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study with consecutive patients who experienced AIS or TIA with AF and CSVD from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019 in the Stroke Center at Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University. Patients are followed for 12 months by outpatient visits or telephone interviews. The safety endpoint of this study was symptomatic ICH (sICH), while the efficacy endpoint was recurrent ischemic events (AIS or TIA). Patients in the DOACs group were compared with patients in the warfarin group using Chi-square tests or the continuity correction Chi-square tests. The safety and efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by the log-rank test. Results: A total of 542 patients were finally included in this study (353 in the DOACs group and 189 in the warfarin group). There were no significant differences in vascular risk factors, NIH Stroke Scale score at baseline, and CHA2DS2-VASc score between the two groups. There were no significant differences in recurrent events between the two groups (P = 0.68). Patients in the DOACs group showed lower risks of sICH (P = 0.03) and a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.03) compared to patients in the warfarin group followed over 12 months. Conclusion: DOACs were associated with lower risks of sICH and similar risks of the recurrent ischemic event as compared to the warfarin group with AF and CSVD. Patients in the DOACs group had shorter hospital stay when compared to patients in the warfarin group. DOACs may be a better option than warfarin for AIS or TIA patients with AF and CSVD for secondary prevention.","PeriodicalId":11702,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Disease","volume":"25 1","pages":"52 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ed.ed_9_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is not only associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients on oral anticoagulation, but also associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Limited data support the benefits of direct, non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and CSVD. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DOACs in AIS or TIA with AF and CSVD. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study with consecutive patients who experienced AIS or TIA with AF and CSVD from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019 in the Stroke Center at Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University. Patients are followed for 12 months by outpatient visits or telephone interviews. The safety endpoint of this study was symptomatic ICH (sICH), while the efficacy endpoint was recurrent ischemic events (AIS or TIA). Patients in the DOACs group were compared with patients in the warfarin group using Chi-square tests or the continuity correction Chi-square tests. The safety and efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by the log-rank test. Results: A total of 542 patients were finally included in this study (353 in the DOACs group and 189 in the warfarin group). There were no significant differences in vascular risk factors, NIH Stroke Scale score at baseline, and CHA2DS2-VASc score between the two groups. There were no significant differences in recurrent events between the two groups (P = 0.68). Patients in the DOACs group showed lower risks of sICH (P = 0.03) and a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.03) compared to patients in the warfarin group followed over 12 months. Conclusion: DOACs were associated with lower risks of sICH and similar risks of the recurrent ischemic event as compared to the warfarin group with AF and CSVD. Patients in the DOACs group had shorter hospital stay when compared to patients in the warfarin group. DOACs may be a better option than warfarin for AIS or TIA patients with AF and CSVD for secondary prevention.
直接、非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗卒中合并心房颤动和脑血管疾病的比较
背景:脑血管病(CSVD)不仅与口服抗凝患者颅内出血(ICH)风险增加相关,而且与缺血性卒中风险增加相关。有限的数据支持直接、非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(直接口服抗凝剂[DOACs])在急性缺血性卒中(AIS)或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)合并非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)和CSVD患者中的益处。我们的目的是评估DOACs在AIS或TIA合并AF和CSVD的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:我们对首都医科大学北京潞河医院脑卒中中心2017年1月1日至2019年12月31日连续发生AIS或TIA合并AF和CSVD的患者进行了回顾性研究。通过门诊或电话访谈对患者进行为期12个月的随访。本研究的安全终点是症状性脑出血(siich),而疗效终点是复发性脑缺血事件(AIS或TIA)。采用卡方检验或连续性校正卡方检验将DOACs组患者与华法林组患者进行比较。安全性和有效性终点是通过log-rank检验评估的无进展生存期。结果:最终纳入542例患者(DOACs组353例,华法林组189例)。两组间血管危险因素、基线时NIH卒中量表评分、CHA2DS2-VASc评分均无显著差异。两组患者复发事件发生率无统计学差异(P = 0.68)。与华法林组相比,DOACs组患者发生sICH的风险较低(P = 0.03),住院时间较短(P = 0.03),随访超过12个月。结论:与华法林组合并AF和CSVD的患者相比,DOACs与sICH的风险较低,与复发性缺血性事件的风险相似。与华法林组相比,DOACs组患者住院时间较短。对于合并心房颤动和心血管疾病的AIS或TIA患者,DOACs可能是比华法林更好的二级预防选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信