A PREFACE TO PHILOSOPHICAL PRAXIS

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
B. Harcourt
{"title":"A PREFACE TO PHILOSOPHICAL PRAXIS","authors":"B. Harcourt","doi":"10.7312/fouc19506-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"irruption. And it defies any conventional notion of progress. Although we like to imagine that a philosophical advance represents enduring progress from more rudimentary times, more often it overcomes an obstacle in the moment. It confronts a new problem. It finds a new way out. Philosophical methods evolve, but that does not mean that earlier approaches are wrong or no longer operative. Nor does it mean that those earlier approaches gave birth to better ones. They addressed a different time. They faced a different conjuncture. They resolved a discrete problem. They served a special purpose. And often, they unveiled one illusion only to expose another. Indeed, a philosophical praxis from an earlier time may be just as performative today, perhaps even more so. It depends on the situation it confronts. We may need it just as badly, or even more than we did at an earlier time. The exigencies of a new crisis may demand a return—though even that is never simply a repetition. To believe otherwise would be to buy into a speculative philosophy of history that has no purchase today. We have long A PREFACE TO PHILOSOPHICAL PRAXIS","PeriodicalId":42039,"journal":{"name":"Theology & Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7312/fouc19506-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

irruption. And it defies any conventional notion of progress. Although we like to imagine that a philosophical advance represents enduring progress from more rudimentary times, more often it overcomes an obstacle in the moment. It confronts a new problem. It finds a new way out. Philosophical methods evolve, but that does not mean that earlier approaches are wrong or no longer operative. Nor does it mean that those earlier approaches gave birth to better ones. They addressed a different time. They faced a different conjuncture. They resolved a discrete problem. They served a special purpose. And often, they unveiled one illusion only to expose another. Indeed, a philosophical praxis from an earlier time may be just as performative today, perhaps even more so. It depends on the situation it confronts. We may need it just as badly, or even more than we did at an earlier time. The exigencies of a new crisis may demand a return—though even that is never simply a repetition. To believe otherwise would be to buy into a speculative philosophy of history that has no purchase today. We have long A PREFACE TO PHILOSOPHICAL PRAXIS
哲学实践的序言
侵入。它违背了任何传统的进步概念。尽管我们喜欢想象哲学的进步代表着从更原始的时代开始的持久进步,但更多的时候,它克服了当下的障碍。它面临着一个新问题。它找到了新的出路。哲学方法在不断发展,但这并不意味着早期的方法是错误的或不再有效。这也不意味着那些早期的方法产生了更好的方法。他们谈论的是一个不同的时代。他们面临着不同的处境。他们解决了一个离散的问题。它们有特殊的用途。通常,他们揭开了一个幻觉,却暴露了另一个。的确,早期的哲学实践在今天可能同样具有表演性,甚至可能更加具有表演性。这取决于它所面临的情况。我们可能和以前一样迫切需要它,甚至比以前更需要它。新危机的迫切性可能要求回归——尽管这绝不是简单的重复。如果你不这么认为,那就等于接受了一种投机的历史哲学,而这种哲学在今天是毫无价值的。我们有一篇很长的《哲学实践》序言
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信