Desempeño del modelo de comunicación política mexicano en la elección de 2018. Una evaluación comprehensiva

Martín Echeverría Victoria, P. Cid, Rubén Arnoldo González Macías, J. L. Aguirre, F. J. M. Garza, C. Muñiz, Magdalena Sofía Paláu Cardona
{"title":"Desempeño del modelo de comunicación política mexicano en la elección de 2018. Una evaluación comprehensiva","authors":"Martín Echeverría Victoria, P. Cid, Rubén Arnoldo González Macías, J. L. Aguirre, F. J. M. Garza, C. Muñiz, Magdalena Sofía Paláu Cardona","doi":"10.22201/FCPYS.24484911E.2021.30.76187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The political communication model is a normative design that sets performance expectations for the Mexican media, as well as an electoral information platform. Though previous research has been conducted to investigate such performance, a general evaluation of the media system as a whole is absent in the literature. This paper presents findings from a content analysis of the messages of 22 printed press ( n = 2095) and four digital outlets ( n = 473), three private ( n = 220), and three public television networks ( n = 222), as well as nine talk shows ( n = 502), three presidential debates ( n = 556), and output from social media (Twitter, 180 twits). We content analyzed those units under a single, cross-media set of categories based on the concepts of balance, information base, and mediated deliberation, that deepen the assessment. Findings reveal that though equity in coverage is achieved, media lacks theme and actor plurality, and is poor in mediated deliberation. This means that citizens do get balanced information during elections, but the former lacks enough substance for them to make a rational vote.","PeriodicalId":101117,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública","volume":"12 1","pages":"17-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/FCPYS.24484911E.2021.30.76187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The political communication model is a normative design that sets performance expectations for the Mexican media, as well as an electoral information platform. Though previous research has been conducted to investigate such performance, a general evaluation of the media system as a whole is absent in the literature. This paper presents findings from a content analysis of the messages of 22 printed press ( n = 2095) and four digital outlets ( n = 473), three private ( n = 220), and three public television networks ( n = 222), as well as nine talk shows ( n = 502), three presidential debates ( n = 556), and output from social media (Twitter, 180 twits). We content analyzed those units under a single, cross-media set of categories based on the concepts of balance, information base, and mediated deliberation, that deepen the assessment. Findings reveal that though equity in coverage is achieved, media lacks theme and actor plurality, and is poor in mediated deliberation. This means that citizens do get balanced information during elections, but the former lacks enough substance for them to make a rational vote.
墨西哥政治传播模式在2018年大选中的表现。全面评估
政治沟通模式是一种规范的设计,为墨西哥媒体设定了绩效期望,也是一个选举信息平台。虽然以前的研究已经对这种表现进行了调查,但文献中缺乏对整个媒体系统的一般评估。本文展示了对22家印刷媒体(n = 2095)和4家数字媒体(n = 473)、3家私人(n = 220)和3家公共电视网络(n = 222)的信息进行内容分析的结果,以及9个谈话节目(n = 502)、3场总统辩论(n = 556)和社交媒体(Twitter, 180条推文)的输出。我们根据平衡、信息库和中介审议的概念,在单一的、跨媒体的一组类别下对这些单元进行了内容分析,从而加深了评估。研究结果表明,虽然实现了报道的公平性,但媒体缺乏主题和行动者多元化,媒介审议能力较差。这意味着公民在选举过程中确实获得了平衡的信息,但前者缺乏足够的内容让他们做出理性的投票。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信