Reconstruction of E-Court Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement

Q3 Social Sciences
Dian Latifiani, Yusriyadi Yusriyadi, Agus Sarono, Ahmad Habib Al Fikry, Mohammad Nur Cholis
{"title":"Reconstruction of E-Court Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement","authors":"Dian Latifiani, Yusriyadi Yusriyadi, Agus Sarono, Ahmad Habib Al Fikry, Mohammad Nur Cholis","doi":"10.15294/jils.v7i2.59993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal protection for the community to obtain rights and recovery of the situation is one of them taken by settling civil cases through the courts. During the times and the adjustment of existing conditions, the Supreme Court issued a responsive and progressive law with the enactment of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 so that the public could obtain essential justice based on the principles of fast, simple, and low-cost justice. The aims of this study are: (i) knowing the legal culture in the implementation of e-court as a reflection of the problems of law enforcement; and (ii) reconstruction of legal culture regarding case administration and court proceedings electronically. The author uses empirical juridical research methods. The results of the study show: (i) e-court based court legal culture is not yet optimal. Village communities seeking justice (non-advocates) at the Religious Courts and District Courts of Semarang Regency tend to prefer conventional registration and trial over e-courts; and (ii) the reconstruction of the legal culture community is carried out using e-court socialization education to all advocates, providing educational media to non-advocates, and providing information about administration and trials electronically through notification letters to the district head .Through this, it will create a legal culture that supports the implementation of e-court so that fair law enforcement can be achieved.","PeriodicalId":32877,"journal":{"name":"JILS Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JILS Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.59993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Legal protection for the community to obtain rights and recovery of the situation is one of them taken by settling civil cases through the courts. During the times and the adjustment of existing conditions, the Supreme Court issued a responsive and progressive law with the enactment of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 so that the public could obtain essential justice based on the principles of fast, simple, and low-cost justice. The aims of this study are: (i) knowing the legal culture in the implementation of e-court as a reflection of the problems of law enforcement; and (ii) reconstruction of legal culture regarding case administration and court proceedings electronically. The author uses empirical juridical research methods. The results of the study show: (i) e-court based court legal culture is not yet optimal. Village communities seeking justice (non-advocates) at the Religious Courts and District Courts of Semarang Regency tend to prefer conventional registration and trial over e-courts; and (ii) the reconstruction of the legal culture community is carried out using e-court socialization education to all advocates, providing educational media to non-advocates, and providing information about administration and trials electronically through notification letters to the district head .Through this, it will create a legal culture that supports the implementation of e-court so that fair law enforcement can be achieved.
民事执法中电子法院法律文化的重构
通过法院解决民事案件,为社区获得权利和恢复状况提供法律保护是其中之一。在时代和现状的调整中,大法院颁布了2019年第1号大法院规则,以响应和进步的法律,以快速、简单、低成本的原则为基础,让国民获得必要的正义。本研究的目的是:(i)了解电子法院实施中的法律文化作为执法问题的反映;(二)重建案件管理和法庭诉讼电子化的法律文化。本文采用实证法学研究方法。研究结果表明:(1)以电子法院为基础的法院法律文化尚不完善。在三宝垄县的宗教法院和地区法院寻求正义的村庄社区(非倡导者)倾向于选择传统的登记和审判,而不是电子法院;(ii)重建法律文化社区,对所有倡导者进行电子法庭社会化教育,向非倡导者提供教育媒体,并以电子方式向地区负责人提供有关行政和审判的信息。通过这种方式,它将创造一个支持实施电子法庭的法律文化,从而实现公平执法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信