{"title":"„Tollwut“ der Franken und wandernde Pest","authors":"K. Leven","doi":"10.25162/medhist-2018-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the account of the Byzantine historian Agathias of Myrina, in 554 AD a Franconian army was hit by a “plague” while invading Italy. Causes of the disease (which befell the leader Leutharis in an abominable kind of „rabies“) were numerous: wrong diatetics, air-pollution etc. But, Agathias emphasized, the barbarian insults should be regarded as the “real” cause. The historian mixed up different causes, a method which has to be regarded in its context. The deployment of medical and theological concepts was related to the literary genre, and imitation of classical literature (“mimesis”) played here a crucial role. Plague was explained in two ways: on the one hand as being carried by the wandering armies (Agathias’ view). On the other hand, plague itself could be regarded as moving: like a diligent tax collector, plague seemed to move through imperial mainland and islands, taking its toll of death. Whereas epidemics of barbarian troops could be explained conventionally by medical and theological concepts, the great “Justinianic” plague could only be comprehended from unconventional points of view. Description took the place of explanation.","PeriodicalId":40892,"journal":{"name":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/medhist-2018-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Following the account of the Byzantine historian Agathias of Myrina, in 554 AD a Franconian army was hit by a “plague” while invading Italy. Causes of the disease (which befell the leader Leutharis in an abominable kind of „rabies“) were numerous: wrong diatetics, air-pollution etc. But, Agathias emphasized, the barbarian insults should be regarded as the “real” cause. The historian mixed up different causes, a method which has to be regarded in its context. The deployment of medical and theological concepts was related to the literary genre, and imitation of classical literature (“mimesis”) played here a crucial role. Plague was explained in two ways: on the one hand as being carried by the wandering armies (Agathias’ view). On the other hand, plague itself could be regarded as moving: like a diligent tax collector, plague seemed to move through imperial mainland and islands, taking its toll of death. Whereas epidemics of barbarian troops could be explained conventionally by medical and theological concepts, the great “Justinianic” plague could only be comprehended from unconventional points of view. Description took the place of explanation.
根据拜占庭历史学家阿加西亚斯(Agathias of Myrina)的记载,公元554年,一支法国军队在入侵意大利时遭遇了一场“瘟疫”。导致这种疾病的原因有很多(它以一种可怕的“狂犬病”降临在首领Leutharis身上):错误的饮食习惯、空气污染等。但是,阿加西亚斯强调,野蛮人的侮辱应该被视为“真正的”原因。历史学家把不同的原因混在一起,这种方法必须结合具体情况来考虑。医学和神学概念的运用与文学体裁有关,对古典文学的模仿(“模仿”)在这里起着至关重要的作用。瘟疫有两种解释:一方面是由流浪军队携带的(阿加西亚斯的观点)。另一方面,瘟疫本身可以被认为是移动的:就像一个勤奋的税务员,瘟疫似乎在帝国的大陆和岛屿上移动,造成死亡人数。野蛮人军队的流行病可以用传统的医学和神学概念来解释,而“查士丁尼大瘟疫”只能用非常规的观点来理解。描述取代了解释。