Situating spatial justice in counter-urban lifestyle mobilities: relational rural theory in a time of crisis

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Bryonny Goodwin‐Hawkins, M. Mahon, M. Farrell, Rhys Dafydd Jones
{"title":"Situating spatial justice in counter-urban lifestyle mobilities: relational rural theory in a time of crisis","authors":"Bryonny Goodwin‐Hawkins, M. Mahon, M. Farrell, Rhys Dafydd Jones","doi":"10.1080/04353684.2022.2086895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic has renewed the rural idyll, as urban-dwellers seek greener, safer spaces. If the counter-urban trend appears for novel reasons, it does so along lifestyle mobilities’ well-worn paths. These paths often depend upon spatial inequalities. Yet, despite awareness that inequalities undergird mobilities, spatial inequalities have remained under-theorized in the lifestyle mobilities literature. This article remedies the gap through the concept of spatial justice. Initially asserting the ‘right to’ urban space, spatial justice has been recently re-thought at a regional scale, and is an emerging interpretation of rural marginalization and redress. As a normative concept, however, spatial justice risks simplistically measuring the distribution and presuming sedentarism. By applying spatial justice to lifestyle mobilities pre-pandemic and looking ahead to future shifts, we offer a nuanced, relational perspective on the theory and the field. Through qualitative case studies from rural and peripheral regions in Wales and Ireland, we show how inequalities and mobilities are complex and inter-related, with significant implications for regional sustainability, cohesion and identity. As the discourse of being ‘all in this together' has rapidly unravelled, we argue that theorizing spatial inequalities is an urgent task for futures beyond recovery – and that lifestyle mobilities are deeply implicated.","PeriodicalId":47542,"journal":{"name":"Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography","volume":"123 2 1","pages":"379 - 394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2022.2086895","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic has renewed the rural idyll, as urban-dwellers seek greener, safer spaces. If the counter-urban trend appears for novel reasons, it does so along lifestyle mobilities’ well-worn paths. These paths often depend upon spatial inequalities. Yet, despite awareness that inequalities undergird mobilities, spatial inequalities have remained under-theorized in the lifestyle mobilities literature. This article remedies the gap through the concept of spatial justice. Initially asserting the ‘right to’ urban space, spatial justice has been recently re-thought at a regional scale, and is an emerging interpretation of rural marginalization and redress. As a normative concept, however, spatial justice risks simplistically measuring the distribution and presuming sedentarism. By applying spatial justice to lifestyle mobilities pre-pandemic and looking ahead to future shifts, we offer a nuanced, relational perspective on the theory and the field. Through qualitative case studies from rural and peripheral regions in Wales and Ireland, we show how inequalities and mobilities are complex and inter-related, with significant implications for regional sustainability, cohesion and identity. As the discourse of being ‘all in this together' has rapidly unravelled, we argue that theorizing spatial inequalities is an urgent task for futures beyond recovery – and that lifestyle mobilities are deeply implicated.
反城市生活方式流动中的空间正义:危机时期的关系乡村理论
随着城市居民寻求更绿色、更安全的空间,2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行刷新了农村的田园牧歌。如果说反城市趋势的出现是出于新奇的原因,那么它是沿着生活方式流动的老路出现的。这些路径往往取决于空间不平等。然而,尽管人们意识到不平等是流动性的基础,但在生活方式流动性的文献中,空间不平等仍然缺乏理论化。本文通过空间正义的概念来弥补这一差距。空间正义最初主张城市空间的“权利”,最近在区域尺度上被重新思考,是对农村边缘化和补救的一种新兴解释。然而,作为一个规范性概念,空间正义有可能简单地衡量分布和假定久坐主义。通过将空间正义应用于流行病前的生活方式流动,并展望未来的变化,我们提供了一个关于理论和领域的微妙的、相关的视角。通过对威尔士和爱尔兰农村和周边地区的定性案例研究,我们展示了不平等和流动性是如何复杂和相互关联的,对区域可持续性、凝聚力和身份具有重要影响。随着“所有人都在一起”的话语迅速瓦解,我们认为,将空间不平等理论化是未来经济复苏之后的一项紧迫任务,而生活方式的流动性与此密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Geografiska Annaler, Series B, is a prestigious international journal publishing articles covering all theoretical and empirical aspects of human and economic geography. The journal has no specific regional profile but some attention is paid to research from the Nordic countries, as well as from countries around the Baltic Sea. Geografiska Annaler, Series B is supported by the Swedish Council for Research in Humanities and Social Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信