COMPARISON OF ILEAL CONDUIT AND TUUC: A 4 YEARS STUDY

I. Soerohardjo, Andy Zulfiqqar, P. Yuri, A. Z. Hendri
{"title":"COMPARISON OF ILEAL CONDUIT AND TUUC: A 4 YEARS STUDY","authors":"I. Soerohardjo, Andy Zulfiqqar, P. Yuri, A. Z. Hendri","doi":"10.32421/juri.v29i1.681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to compare 4 years of experience of IC and TUUC in the same period and among similar experienced surgeons. Material & Methods: Between January 2016 and August 2019, 44 radical cystectomies were performed, but 4 patients were excluded due to incomplete data or who underwent neo-bladder procedures. The primary endpoint was 30 days of complication rate and intraoperative complications. Bowel movement, ambulation, and length of stay (LOS) postoperatively were followed-up over a period of 30-day postoperatively. Results: 12 male patients underwent TUUC and 24 male patients IC, while only 4 female patients underwent IC. The mean of LOS of IC was 12.72  8.6 and 10.08 3.5 for TUUC; there were no significant differences between arms. However, TUUC had lower intra-operatively bleeding (779.17  441.15 ml) compared to IC (1328.57  810.40 ml). There was no difference in early complications between arms. Conclusion: Our results suggest that TUU with UC diversion may be used as a viable option of urinary diversion in radical cystectomy. This technique provides similar safety both surgically and oncologically.","PeriodicalId":13565,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Urology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32421/juri.v29i1.681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare 4 years of experience of IC and TUUC in the same period and among similar experienced surgeons. Material & Methods: Between January 2016 and August 2019, 44 radical cystectomies were performed, but 4 patients were excluded due to incomplete data or who underwent neo-bladder procedures. The primary endpoint was 30 days of complication rate and intraoperative complications. Bowel movement, ambulation, and length of stay (LOS) postoperatively were followed-up over a period of 30-day postoperatively. Results: 12 male patients underwent TUUC and 24 male patients IC, while only 4 female patients underwent IC. The mean of LOS of IC was 12.72  8.6 and 10.08 3.5 for TUUC; there were no significant differences between arms. However, TUUC had lower intra-operatively bleeding (779.17  441.15 ml) compared to IC (1328.57  810.40 ml). There was no difference in early complications between arms. Conclusion: Our results suggest that TUU with UC diversion may be used as a viable option of urinary diversion in radical cystectomy. This technique provides similar safety both surgically and oncologically.
回肠导管与输卵管的比较:4年研究
目的:本研究旨在比较4年同期和同类经验的外科医生的IC和TUUC经验。材料与方法:2016年1月至2019年8月,44例患者行根治性膀胱切除术,但有4例患者因资料不完整或接受了新膀胱手术而被排除。主要终点是30天的并发症发生率和术中并发症。术后随访30天的肠蠕动、活动和住院时间(LOS)。结果:男性行TUUC 12例,男性行IC 24例,女性仅行IC 4例,TUUC的LOS平均值分别为12.72 8.6和10.08 3.5;两组间无显著差异。然而,TUUC的术中出血(779.17 441.15 ml)低于IC (1328.57 810.40 ml)。两组患者的早期并发症没有差异。结论:本研究结果提示TUU联合UC导流可作为根治性膀胱切除术中尿路导流的可行选择。这项技术在手术和肿瘤方面都提供了类似的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信