Comparison of binding affinity evaluations for FKBP ligands with state-of-the-art computational methods: FMO, QM/MM, MM-PB/SA and MP-CAFEE approaches

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
博文 渡邉, 成典 田中, 憲明 沖本, 亜樹 長谷川, 泰地 真弘人, 義明 谷田, 崇志 三井, 勝山 マリコ, 秀章 藤谷
{"title":"Comparison of binding affinity evaluations for FKBP ligands with state-of-the-art computational methods: FMO, QM/MM, MM-PB/SA and MP-CAFEE approaches","authors":"博文 渡邉, 成典 田中, 憲明 沖本, 亜樹 長谷川, 泰地 真弘人, 義明 谷田, 崇志 三井, 勝山 マリコ, 秀章 藤谷","doi":"10.1273/CBIJ.10.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared binding affinity evaluations for 10 FKBP ligands with such state-of-the-art computational methods as FMO, QM/MM, MM-PB/SA, and MP-CAFEE. For the FKBP ligands, we confirmed that each method could provide good correlations between the experimental and computational binding affinities. From the calculated results, we discussed the importance of solvation effect and structural sampling for these methods in detail. In addition, we argued the issue of computational time and present arguments on the future perspective of the computational binding affinity evaluations.","PeriodicalId":40659,"journal":{"name":"Chem-Bio Informatics Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chem-Bio Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1273/CBIJ.10.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

We compared binding affinity evaluations for 10 FKBP ligands with such state-of-the-art computational methods as FMO, QM/MM, MM-PB/SA, and MP-CAFEE. For the FKBP ligands, we confirmed that each method could provide good correlations between the experimental and computational binding affinities. From the calculated results, we discussed the importance of solvation effect and structural sampling for these methods in detail. In addition, we argued the issue of computational time and present arguments on the future perspective of the computational binding affinity evaluations.
FMO、QM/MM、MM- pb /SA和MP-CAFEE方法对FKBP配体结合亲和力评价的比较
我们比较了FMO、QM/MM、MM- pb /SA和MP-CAFEE等最先进的计算方法对10种FKBP配体的结合亲和力评价。对于FKBP配体,我们证实了每种方法都可以在实验和计算的结合亲和力之间提供良好的相关性。从计算结果出发,详细讨论了溶剂化效应和结构取样对这些方法的重要性。此外,我们还讨论了计算时间的问题,并就计算绑定亲和力评估的未来前景提出了论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chem-Bio Informatics Journal
Chem-Bio Informatics Journal BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信