Warfarin: time in therapeutic range, a single centre study on patients using warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and prosthetic heart valves

D. Sadhabiriss
{"title":"Warfarin: time in therapeutic range, a single centre study on patients using warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and prosthetic heart valves","authors":"D. Sadhabiriss","doi":"10.24170/18-1-4771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Two common indications for oral anticoagulants are patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or prosthetic heart valves (PHV). The degree of anticoagulation is monitored by evaluating the international normalised ratio (INR); however, the quality of anticoagulation, determined by the time in therapeutic range (TTR), is less often evaluated. TTR has significant clinical implications in patient outcomes. \nObjectives: We sought to identify the indications for anticoagulation and determine its quality via the TTR at a single centre, community-based and district level hospital in the setting of usual care. We documented the prevalence of thrombo-embolic and haemorrhagic adverse events and we also collected data on factors that may contribute to a poor TTR or increased risk of adverse events. \nMethods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive and observational study with chart audits evaluating the anticoagulation indication and control for the preceding 1 year for each patient. Descriptive statistics included mean and standard deviation for quantitative data and frequencies for categorical data. Chi-square tests were used to analyse comparisons of categorical data and the student’s t-test for continuous variables. Two-tailed p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. \nResults: TTR was poor for patients with AF and PHV (44.5% and 13.7% respectively). We identified older age, less frequent testing and high target ranges as significant factors associated with poorer outcomes. We demonstrated a high prevalence of adverse events (25.4%). \nConclusion: Patients in this setting demonstrated poor quality of anticoagulation and had a high prevalence of adverse events.","PeriodicalId":55781,"journal":{"name":"SA Heart Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24170/18-1-4771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Two common indications for oral anticoagulants are patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or prosthetic heart valves (PHV). The degree of anticoagulation is monitored by evaluating the international normalised ratio (INR); however, the quality of anticoagulation, determined by the time in therapeutic range (TTR), is less often evaluated. TTR has significant clinical implications in patient outcomes. Objectives: We sought to identify the indications for anticoagulation and determine its quality via the TTR at a single centre, community-based and district level hospital in the setting of usual care. We documented the prevalence of thrombo-embolic and haemorrhagic adverse events and we also collected data on factors that may contribute to a poor TTR or increased risk of adverse events. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive and observational study with chart audits evaluating the anticoagulation indication and control for the preceding 1 year for each patient. Descriptive statistics included mean and standard deviation for quantitative data and frequencies for categorical data. Chi-square tests were used to analyse comparisons of categorical data and the student’s t-test for continuous variables. Two-tailed p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results: TTR was poor for patients with AF and PHV (44.5% and 13.7% respectively). We identified older age, less frequent testing and high target ranges as significant factors associated with poorer outcomes. We demonstrated a high prevalence of adverse events (25.4%). Conclusion: Patients in this setting demonstrated poor quality of anticoagulation and had a high prevalence of adverse events.
华法林:在治疗范围内的时间,一项使用华法林预防非瓣膜性心房颤动和人工心脏瓣膜患者中风的单中心研究
背景:口服抗凝剂的两个常见适应症是非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)或人工心脏瓣膜(PHV)患者。通过评估国际正常化比率(INR)来监测抗凝程度;然而,由治疗范围内时间(TTR)决定的抗凝质量却很少得到评估。TTR对患者预后有重要的临床意义。目的:我们试图通过单一中心、社区和区级医院在常规护理环境下的TTR确定抗凝的适应症并确定其质量。我们记录了血栓栓塞和出血性不良事件的发生率,并收集了可能导致TTR差或不良事件风险增加的因素的数据。方法:我们进行了回顾性、描述性和观察性研究,采用图表审计评估每位患者前1年的抗凝指征和控制。描述性统计包括定量数据的平均值和标准差,分类数据的频率。用卡方检验分析分类数据的比较,用学生t检验分析连续变量的比较。双尾p值小于0.05被认为是显著的。结果:AF和PHV患者的TTR较差(分别为44.5%和13.7%)。我们确定年龄较大、检测频率较低和目标范围高是与预后较差相关的重要因素。我们发现不良事件的发生率很高(25.4%)。结论:该组患者抗凝治疗质量较差,不良事件发生率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信