PERBEDAAN EFEKTIFITAS METODE PENDIDIKAN KESEHATAN BASIC LIFE SUPPORT (BLS) AUDIOVISUAL DENGAN DEMONSTRASI TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN LIFE SAVING PADA MAHASISWA ILMU KEPERAWATAN FIK UNIVERSITAS KADIRI

Sri Haryuni, W. Sulistyawati
{"title":"PERBEDAAN EFEKTIFITAS METODE PENDIDIKAN KESEHATAN BASIC LIFE SUPPORT (BLS) AUDIOVISUAL DENGAN DEMONSTRASI TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN LIFE SAVING PADA MAHASISWA ILMU KEPERAWATAN FIK UNIVERSITAS KADIRI","authors":"Sri Haryuni, W. Sulistyawati","doi":"10.32700/jnc.v2i1.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the world and ischemic heart disease is the most common cause. Emergency conditions (cardiac arrest) can occur anywhere, and to anyone and is an emergency life-threatening condition and requires immediate treatment. Nursing students need to acquire Basic Life Support (BLS) competency as one of the important competencies to provide first aid as one of life saving efforts in patients. BLS health education in nursing students as a candidate for health workers is needed as an effort to improve the live saving ability so that students are able to perform treatment in patients with breath and heart sigh during practice in hospital as well as facing patients with stop breathing and cardiac arrest anywhere. This study aims to determine the differences in the effectiveness of audiovisual Basic Life Support (BLS) health education method with demonstration of live saving ability in students with cardiovascular disease. The method used is quasi experimental, with pretest and posttest design. This research uses Purposive Sampling and divide the respondents into two groups, the audiovisual method group (n = 17) and the demonstration method group (n = 17). Based on the normality test data obtained normal distributed data so that statistical test used is parametric test that is using Paired T Test and Independent T Test. The result of paired t test is obtained pvalue = 0,001, there is difference of life saving before and after training with demonstration method, and pvalue = 0,003, there is difference of live saving ability of student before and after training with audiovisual method. While the test results independent test obtained pvalue = 0.04. This suggests a difference in effectiveness between audiovisual methods and demonstration methods with live saving skills of nursing science students. Based on the results of this study the need for BLS taught in a demonstration in order to further improve the ability of live saving students.","PeriodicalId":22775,"journal":{"name":"The journal of nursing care","volume":"21 1","pages":"31-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of nursing care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32700/jnc.v2i1.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the world and ischemic heart disease is the most common cause. Emergency conditions (cardiac arrest) can occur anywhere, and to anyone and is an emergency life-threatening condition and requires immediate treatment. Nursing students need to acquire Basic Life Support (BLS) competency as one of the important competencies to provide first aid as one of life saving efforts in patients. BLS health education in nursing students as a candidate for health workers is needed as an effort to improve the live saving ability so that students are able to perform treatment in patients with breath and heart sigh during practice in hospital as well as facing patients with stop breathing and cardiac arrest anywhere. This study aims to determine the differences in the effectiveness of audiovisual Basic Life Support (BLS) health education method with demonstration of live saving ability in students with cardiovascular disease. The method used is quasi experimental, with pretest and posttest design. This research uses Purposive Sampling and divide the respondents into two groups, the audiovisual method group (n = 17) and the demonstration method group (n = 17). Based on the normality test data obtained normal distributed data so that statistical test used is parametric test that is using Paired T Test and Independent T Test. The result of paired t test is obtained pvalue = 0,001, there is difference of life saving before and after training with demonstration method, and pvalue = 0,003, there is difference of live saving ability of student before and after training with audiovisual method. While the test results independent test obtained pvalue = 0.04. This suggests a difference in effectiveness between audiovisual methods and demonstration methods with live saving skills of nursing science students. Based on the results of this study the need for BLS taught in a demonstration in order to further improve the ability of live saving students.
《基本生命支持健康教育方法》(BLS)音效的不同之处,展示了卡利姆大学护理专业学生的生存能力
心血管疾病是世界上导致死亡的主要原因,而缺血性心脏病是最常见的原因。紧急情况(心脏骤停)可以发生在任何地方,发生在任何人身上,是危及生命的紧急情况,需要立即治疗。护理专业学生需要掌握基本生命支持(BLS)能力,这是为患者提供急救作为挽救生命努力的重要能力之一。作为卫生工作者候选人,需要对护理专业学生进行BLS健康教育,以提高学生的救生能力,使学生能够在医院实践中对呼吸和心脏叹息的患者进行治疗,并在任何地方面对呼吸停止和心脏骤停的患者。本研究旨在探讨具有挽救生命能力的视听基本生命支持(BLS)健康教育方法在心血管疾病学生中的效果差异。采用准实验方法,采用前测和后测设计。本研究采用目的性抽样的方法,将受访者分为视听法组(n = 17)和实证法组(n = 17)两组。根据正态性检验数据得到正态分布数据,因此统计检验使用的是参数检验,即使用配对T检验和独立T检验。配对t检验的结果p值= 0.001,说明演示法培训前后学员的救生能力存在差异;p值= 0.003,说明视听法培训前后学员的救生能力存在差异。而检验结果独立检验得到pvalue = 0.04。这表明视听方法与演示方法在护理科学专业学生救生技能的效果上存在差异。根据本研究的结果,有必要在BLS教学中进行示范,以进一步提高学生的救生能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信